VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
4385
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un autore solitario e controverso viene tirato fuori dal nascondiglio quando inizia a ricevere infinite lettere da un fan ossessivo. Ciò che ne consegue è un pericoloso labirinto mentre cerc... Leggi tuttoUn autore solitario e controverso viene tirato fuori dal nascondiglio quando inizia a ricevere infinite lettere da un fan ossessivo. Ciò che ne consegue è un pericoloso labirinto mentre cerca la persona dietro i messaggi criptici.Un autore solitario e controverso viene tirato fuori dal nascondiglio quando inizia a ricevere infinite lettere da un fan ossessivo. Ciò che ne consegue è un pericoloso labirinto mentre cerca la persona dietro i messaggi criptici.
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Rachel Slavick
- GNN Reporter
- (as Rachel Slavik)
Joel Abadal
- Young Dwight Tufford
- (as Chandler Worre)
Recensioni in evidenza
This was quite an ok flick. Large part of this is due to Guy Pearce's contribution. He's usually a dependable actor, and comes through here with flying colors. In fact he's the best thing about the movie. Granted that the rest of the cast aren't given much space, apart from Jeremy Davies who is also brilliant with his limited role, no one else stands out. Alice Eve as the female officer doesn't work at all.
The movie itself is very slow moving, but I still found myself getting drawn in to the story. Can't say that the ending had any particular payoff for me, but it still worked. Would say I was pleasantly surprised by this.
The movie itself is very slow moving, but I still found myself getting drawn in to the story. Can't say that the ending had any particular payoff for me, but it still worked. Would say I was pleasantly surprised by this.
I actually enjoyed it - it was better than what I was expecting. The beginning gets to be little drawn out to finally work your way towards the end - but it's not bad. Again, I enjoyed it. Guy Pierce did a great job - and although it was a little slow, I still enjoyed it nonetheless. Now then if I added more to this review, I'd probably have have spoilers - and I don't want to completely dissect the entire film or spoil anyth. But it wasn't terrible - a little bit drawn out - but it was okay overall. This sentence I am writing now will help me to reach the mandatory minimum length of my review! Whew!!!
The film tells the story of a one-hit-wonder writer, Bruce Cogburn, who now lives as a recluse in southern California following a mass-shooting incident where the shooter "blamed" his motive for the crime on Cogburn's book. Now 25 years on from the incident, Cogburn begins to receive a barrage of letters from an unknown source, leading to the question that carries the film; "who is sending all these letters?".
The answer isn't an obvious one and you are genuinely wondering right 'til the last act of the film, as it leads you down various different potential "suspects". You think the film is going to take you one way, then it takes a sharp turn in another, unexpected direction. The final twist is a good one...but the execution is a little laboured and indulgent.
The film has a relatively slow pace - don't expect big shoot outs and car chases, but keeps you gripped right through. Guy Pearce is on top form as usual, playing an alcoholic, paranoid hermit. How he manages to nail all these different accents is beyond me! He's accompanied by Alice Eve and Alex Pettyfer who give solid performances as well.
This is an intelligent thriller that is well written , well acted and well shot. Think along the lines of Stephen King's "Secret Window" with less psychopathy.
Watch the movie if you like the following:
Don't watch if you're expecting:
The only downside is the very end, which I shan't spoil. It feels a little extravagant and is perhaps trying too hard to be prodigious.
The film certainly doesn't deserve the low ratings it has received, so don't be put off by it. Overall it is definitely worth a watch if you're in the mood for a good thriller that keeps you gripped, and if you're a fan of Guy Pearce - which you should be!
The answer isn't an obvious one and you are genuinely wondering right 'til the last act of the film, as it leads you down various different potential "suspects". You think the film is going to take you one way, then it takes a sharp turn in another, unexpected direction. The final twist is a good one...but the execution is a little laboured and indulgent.
The film has a relatively slow pace - don't expect big shoot outs and car chases, but keeps you gripped right through. Guy Pearce is on top form as usual, playing an alcoholic, paranoid hermit. How he manages to nail all these different accents is beyond me! He's accompanied by Alice Eve and Alex Pettyfer who give solid performances as well.
This is an intelligent thriller that is well written , well acted and well shot. Think along the lines of Stephen King's "Secret Window" with less psychopathy.
Watch the movie if you like the following:
- Great acting from the lead
- Clever writing
- Good cinematography
- Compelling plot
- Twists and turns
Don't watch if you're expecting:
- Gun shoot outs
- Car chases
- Fast pace
- Over edited, over-choreographed fight scenes
The only downside is the very end, which I shan't spoil. It feels a little extravagant and is perhaps trying too hard to be prodigious.
The film certainly doesn't deserve the low ratings it has received, so don't be put off by it. Overall it is definitely worth a watch if you're in the mood for a good thriller that keeps you gripped, and if you're a fan of Guy Pearce - which you should be!
I don't quite know why this didn't work, but it wasn't gripping, the story was messy and was clunky. The acting was really good and I love the idea, but disappointing sadly. Some interesting twist, so not a complete flop, and whoever wrote it was clearly intellectual, just a bit of a dullard, or maybe that was the director? Had to tell.
Not as scary as I was hoping, as the advert made it look awesome. Maybe there weren't enough characters in the film? Sorry I can't quite put my finger on what the issue is here, but there we go.
I'd love to read some other reviews of this, so get posting! .....
Not as scary as I was hoping, as the advert made it look awesome. Maybe there weren't enough characters in the film? Sorry I can't quite put my finger on what the issue is here, but there we go.
I'd love to read some other reviews of this, so get posting! .....
A thriller as slow-burn as debut writer / director Andrew Hunt's "The Infernal Machine" relies on its ending, which here is self-satisfied, contrived & implausible... wasting some terrific dark & moody set up work. Reclusive writer Guy Pearce (always solid) lives in isolation after his only novel inspired a mass-shooter 40yrs+ ago. Then SOMEONE starts sending him persistent 'fan mail'... but is it more sinister than that (duh)? Is it the jailed shooter Alex Pettyfor? Will Pearce get help from pretty cop Alice Eve (whose performance epitomises the whole movie: surprisingly good, til ultimately it ain't)? Worthy questions all, all sadly let down by that bloated ending. Shame... sigh.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe name of the town "Almas Perdidas" meaning Lost Souls.
- BlooperWhen confronting Tuffurd, Cogburn slams a pistol cartridge against a piece of furniture, and it fires. Slamming a bullet against a smooth surface would not work, unless there were a protruding nail or other sharp point to depress the pistol primer.
- Citazioni
Bruce Cogburn: Who's sending the fucking messages?
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Infernal Machine?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 37.002 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti