L'8 febbraio 1977, Tony Kiritsis, armato, irrompe nell'ufficio di Richard Hall, presidente della Meridian Mortgage Company, e lo prende in ostaggio, minacciandolo con un fucile da caccia pun... Leggi tuttoL'8 febbraio 1977, Tony Kiritsis, armato, irrompe nell'ufficio di Richard Hall, presidente della Meridian Mortgage Company, e lo prende in ostaggio, minacciandolo con un fucile da caccia puntato al collo da un meccanismo a filo.L'8 febbraio 1977, Tony Kiritsis, armato, irrompe nell'ufficio di Richard Hall, presidente della Meridian Mortgage Company, e lo prende in ostaggio, minacciandolo con un fucile da caccia puntato al collo da un meccanismo a filo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
At a time when many of us may feel like we're being systematically shafted by big business and powerful financial institutions, it's natural that some of us might feel justified in seeking retribution against them for their deceitful actions. Such was also the case in February 1977, when an aggrieved borrower sought potentially deadly vengeance against the president of an Indianapolis mortgage company, as seen in this fact-based comedy-drama-thriller from director Gus Van Sant. When Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård), a mentally challenged borrower, felt financially betrayed by a lender he implicitly trusted, he decided to take action to get back at the loan company's owner, M. L. Hall (Al Pacino). However, on the day he was scheduled to meet with Mr. Hall, Kiritsis learned that he was on a last-minute midwinter "business trip" to Florida, thereby thwarting his plans for revenge. So, with his principal intention thus foiled, the angry customer resorted to his fallback plan, taking the owner's son, Richard (Dacre Montgomery), as hostage. And, to show the world he meant business, the perpetrator fitted his captive with a taut wire around his neck that was connected to a shotgun set to fire with the slightest unplanned motion. However, despite his seemingly efficient planning, the determined but somewhat bumbling culprit ended up launching what would turn out to be a cross between a heinous criminal event and a comical media circus that mesmerized the city for days. Law enforcement officials, like Kiritsis's acquaintance, Det. Michael Grable (Cary Elwes), were frustrated by developments at nearly every turn, while many in the public at large sympathized with the captor's seemingly justifiable motives. And, in the process, the event exploded to draw in a variety of ancillary storylines, such as the determined campaign of a neophyte television reporter (Myha'la) aggressively seeking to lock down coverage of her first breakthrough story and the improvised negotiation efforts of a popular local radio host (Colman Domingo) who was trusted by the event's ringmaster who was unwittingly drawn into the fray. The result is an accurate re-enactment of a potentially dangerous event that ultimately plays out like a classic example of pure Americana kitsch, a film that calls to mind elements found in such releases as "Dog Day Afternoon" (1975) and "Breaking" (2022). However, despite the picture's commendable efforts at re-creating a scenario that has largely slipped from public memory over the years, this release feels as though it tries a little too hard at times, as if it's wearing its penchant for period piece authenticity on its sleeve. In addition, portions of the narrative drag somewhat in the middle, coming across like padding to fill out the easily trimmed 1:45:00 runtime. Those criticisms aside, however, "Dead Man's Wire" nevertheless features an excellent production design, along with fine performances by Domingo, Pacino, and, especially, Skarsgård. This modestly entertaining offering generally holds viewer interest reasonably well, providing a modicum of gripping drama and more than a few well-earned chuckles along the way. If nothing else, however, the story should serve as a warning to those who would try to pull one over on an increasingly unsettled, unpredictable, trigger-happy public, one whose imbedded lesson strongly cautions that cost of calculated financial scheming could easily overshadow whatever profits might come from such artful material deception.
Watched at the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival.
Gus Van Sant has always been a fascinating director as his works on Elephant, Good Will Hunting, Gerry, To Die For, Last Days, and Paranoid Park are some of my favorite indie art-house movies ever. Since his last movie in seven years, Van Sant brings a slick, tense and comedic tale about the kidnapping and crime moment by Tony Kiritsis and the tension surrounding the event.
Throughout, the production designs, Van Sant's direction and the atmosphere is strong. It helps build a sense of it's time period and the characters that are situated in this tense moment. What Van Sant succeeds is grasping the characters motives, understand their personalities and see through them as human. Paralleling themes about the corrupted and flawed system behind the mortgage and money business, and the conflicts it creates. The writing, while it is pretty straight-forward and predictable, is solid as some of the themes and concepts explored are interesting.
All of the performances are pretty good. Bill Skarsard is absolutely fantastic, alongside with the rest of the cast members. I do wish some of the pacing in the second act and certain dialogue moments could improve as some of the moments did feel a bit overlong or strangely paced at times. But overall, it's nice to see Van Sant still got it with his talents.
Gus Van Sant has always been a fascinating director as his works on Elephant, Good Will Hunting, Gerry, To Die For, Last Days, and Paranoid Park are some of my favorite indie art-house movies ever. Since his last movie in seven years, Van Sant brings a slick, tense and comedic tale about the kidnapping and crime moment by Tony Kiritsis and the tension surrounding the event.
Throughout, the production designs, Van Sant's direction and the atmosphere is strong. It helps build a sense of it's time period and the characters that are situated in this tense moment. What Van Sant succeeds is grasping the characters motives, understand their personalities and see through them as human. Paralleling themes about the corrupted and flawed system behind the mortgage and money business, and the conflicts it creates. The writing, while it is pretty straight-forward and predictable, is solid as some of the themes and concepts explored are interesting.
All of the performances are pretty good. Bill Skarsard is absolutely fantastic, alongside with the rest of the cast members. I do wish some of the pacing in the second act and certain dialogue moments could improve as some of the moments did feel a bit overlong or strangely paced at times. But overall, it's nice to see Van Sant still got it with his talents.
Dead Man's Wire is a masterclass in tonal balance-tense, hilarious, and deeply unsettling. Gus Van Sant crafts a 1970s-set crime drama that feels both timeless and urgently relevant. From the first scene, I was hooked. The pacing is flawless, the atmosphere electric, and the emotional stakes never let up.
Bill Skarsgård delivers a performance that's nothing short of Oscar-worthy. His portrayal of Tony Kiritsis is manic, tragic, and disturbingly charismatic. But what truly surprised me was Al Pacino. In a brief but unforgettable role as the arrogant father of the hostage, Pacino channels a Southern drawl and a venomous detachment that adds a layer of surreal comedy to the film. His phone call scene-mocking his own son while refusing to apologize-is one of the most chilling and absurd moments I've seen on screen this year.
Van Sant's direction is razor-sharp. He allows moments of improvisation (the "milk with ice" detail was apparently ad-libbed!) that add authenticity and spontaneity. The production design perfectly captures the grainy, analog tension of the era, and the soundtrack-especially the radio segments-grounds the film in a media landscape that feels eerily familiar.
What elevates Dead Man's Wire is its refusal to simplify. It doesn't ask for pity, nor does it glorify madness. Instead, it exposes a system so broken that even the most outrageous acts begin to make sense. It's a film that laughs at the absurdity of injustice while never losing sight of its human cost.
This is Van Sant at his most daring, most political, and most emotionally precise. A cinematic triumph.
Bill Skarsgård delivers a performance that's nothing short of Oscar-worthy. His portrayal of Tony Kiritsis is manic, tragic, and disturbingly charismatic. But what truly surprised me was Al Pacino. In a brief but unforgettable role as the arrogant father of the hostage, Pacino channels a Southern drawl and a venomous detachment that adds a layer of surreal comedy to the film. His phone call scene-mocking his own son while refusing to apologize-is one of the most chilling and absurd moments I've seen on screen this year.
Van Sant's direction is razor-sharp. He allows moments of improvisation (the "milk with ice" detail was apparently ad-libbed!) that add authenticity and spontaneity. The production design perfectly captures the grainy, analog tension of the era, and the soundtrack-especially the radio segments-grounds the film in a media landscape that feels eerily familiar.
What elevates Dead Man's Wire is its refusal to simplify. It doesn't ask for pity, nor does it glorify madness. Instead, it exposes a system so broken that even the most outrageous acts begin to make sense. It's a film that laughs at the absurdity of injustice while never losing sight of its human cost.
This is Van Sant at his most daring, most political, and most emotionally precise. A cinematic triumph.
Just saw this movie at TIFF. One of the best movies I have seen in a while. Two hours went insanely fast. The acting was sensational, especially the main two characters. Bill was Oscar worthy in his role as the protagonist. Gus noted in the Q&A that he likes actors ad-libbing. Apparently milk with ice was one of those!
Al Pacino receives top billing in this true-life story, though he's probably in the film no more than five or ten minutes. So, if you're watching it for him, you'll likely feel hoodwinked!
The story is about a real person, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård). In 1977, Kiritsis entered mortgage company office...taking the president hostage and rigging him up with a 'dead man's wire'...a harness of sorts attached to a shotgun aimed at the president! In other words, if police tried to stop Kiritsis, the gun would go off. Why did he do this desperate act? Well, he felt like the company had ruined him financially...stealing his idea for a shopping mall. What happened after? See the film.
The acting is generally very good (though Pacino does seem to ham it up a bit) and the story is interesting. However, it's also a film you could either watch or just read the Wikipedia article about Kiritsis. Now I am not saying it's a bad film in any way...it's very good. But the story is simple and if you just want to know how it all works out, read the article.
The story is about a real person, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård). In 1977, Kiritsis entered mortgage company office...taking the president hostage and rigging him up with a 'dead man's wire'...a harness of sorts attached to a shotgun aimed at the president! In other words, if police tried to stop Kiritsis, the gun would go off. Why did he do this desperate act? Well, he felt like the company had ruined him financially...stealing his idea for a shopping mall. What happened after? See the film.
The acting is generally very good (though Pacino does seem to ham it up a bit) and the story is interesting. However, it's also a film you could either watch or just read the Wikipedia article about Kiritsis. Now I am not saying it's a bad film in any way...it's very good. But the story is simple and if you just want to know how it all works out, read the article.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDead Man's Wire is partially based on the documentary Dead Man's Line (2018)
- BlooperThere are a few questionable items & phrases that either were not popular or didn't exist in 1977. "Kerfuffle" wasn't used in the US until the late 1990's, and Sugar-free baked goods would not have been easily available. They were most sought after for diabetics. If Richard Hall was seeking them out, the logic is- he was diabetic. But, that is not mentioned or ever an issue during his captivity, so this detail seems irrelevant.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
See the current lineup for the 50th Toronto International Film Festival this September.
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 45min(105 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti






