Quando un poliziotto locale e un assistente sociale troppo zelante seguono gli indizi di casi di persone scomparse in città, vengono alla luce scoperte sconvolgenti in un allevamento di maia... Leggi tuttoQuando un poliziotto locale e un assistente sociale troppo zelante seguono gli indizi di casi di persone scomparse in città, vengono alla luce scoperte sconvolgenti in un allevamento di maiali.Quando un poliziotto locale e un assistente sociale troppo zelante seguono gli indizi di casi di persone scomparse in città, vengono alla luce scoperte sconvolgenti in un allevamento di maiali.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Jo Armstrong
- Star
- (as Joanne Armstrong)
Pasha McKenley
- Shawanda
- (as Pasha Shabazz Mckenley)
Jennifer Caputo
- Dump Truck Driver
- (as Jennifer Jo Caputo)
Recensioni in evidenza
First off, why was Tyrese even in this movie? His role in the movie was meaningless. In my opinion, Tyrese parts in the movie was boring filler. The arrogant role he played was seriously pointless.
Let's tackle the drug addiction part of the movie since the women that was murdered was addicted to drugs and prostituted. The writers could have done better. Some of the women didn't look the part. They did something to their teeth to make them look terrible and called them drug addicts. Lol I'm laughing while writing this review.
Seriously though, their teeth matched the part, but their bodies surely didn't.
The Emergency call doctor didn't play the role right. I honestly think the acting and the scrip was terribly done.
There was nothing unique about the movie. Drugs. Prostitution. Relationship problems. And murders. It lacked creativity and realistic roles to the situations they tackled.
The bar tender was probably the best actor in the entire movie.
Let's tackle the drug addiction part of the movie since the women that was murdered was addicted to drugs and prostituted. The writers could have done better. Some of the women didn't look the part. They did something to their teeth to make them look terrible and called them drug addicts. Lol I'm laughing while writing this review.
Seriously though, their teeth matched the part, but their bodies surely didn't.
The Emergency call doctor didn't play the role right. I honestly think the acting and the scrip was terribly done.
There was nothing unique about the movie. Drugs. Prostitution. Relationship problems. And murders. It lacked creativity and realistic roles to the situations they tackled.
The bar tender was probably the best actor in the entire movie.
Squealer is a serial killer film, whose story is loosely based on the Robert Picton case.
It's not exact portrayal, or anything.
But the similarities are clearly there.
Anyone from Canada will clearly recognize this.
Especially because Ronnie Gene Blevins looks remarkably similar to him, here.
Picton was a pig farmer- known as "The Butcher" or "Pigman"- who preyed on drug addicted prostitutes from the poverty stricken East Side of Vancouver.
And was one of the most prolific serial killers in Canadian history.
Like in the film, after killing his victims...he would dismember, and feed their remains to his pigs.
Possibly after eating bits of their bodies, himself.
The creators have obviously taken their own artistic liberties with his story.
Adding in an extended crime aspect, some drama, and a criminal investigation angle to it.
But the basis for it all won't escape the observations of any Canadian viewers, who were privy to news coverage throughout the 2000s.
Where the story dominated the news cycle.
The role played by Kate Moennig is also based on a real person, Dinah Taylor.
Who was Picton's main accomplice in the killings.
She would introduce Picton to many of his victims, in exchange for drugs.
Whose promise was the lure she'd use to get the girls to come to Picton's farm.
The woman who escapes from him at the beinning of the film is based on a real person, as well.
The pseudonymous "Ms. Anderson", who testified about escaping from Picton's farm in handcuffs at his trial.
While the Lulu character played by Christina Gonzalez is somewhat based on Monique Wood.
Another woman who would testify, about her interaction with Picton, at his trial.
In regards to production...sure, it's kind of a low budget effort, with heavy made-for-TV vibes.
As if it were a Lifetime movie, or something like that.
But the acting in it is surprisingly decent, across the board.
And it does have a subtly creepy vibe going for it.
But it's not overtly scary.
And acts more like a biopic, than it does a horror.
I also love how they make the unsung hero, of the whole ordeal, iconic Canadian actor Graham Greene.
Who does a great job as the doctor, whose observations break open the case.
While by no means a masterpiece, in any conceivable facet.
It's certainly a competent, and entertaining, low budget biopic.
That is likely to resonate with Canadian viewers.
Even if American viewers aren't able to recognize the connections to the actual case.
The bit where the pigs maul the dude is hilariously absurd though.
4.5 out of 10.
It's not exact portrayal, or anything.
But the similarities are clearly there.
Anyone from Canada will clearly recognize this.
Especially because Ronnie Gene Blevins looks remarkably similar to him, here.
Picton was a pig farmer- known as "The Butcher" or "Pigman"- who preyed on drug addicted prostitutes from the poverty stricken East Side of Vancouver.
And was one of the most prolific serial killers in Canadian history.
Like in the film, after killing his victims...he would dismember, and feed their remains to his pigs.
Possibly after eating bits of their bodies, himself.
The creators have obviously taken their own artistic liberties with his story.
Adding in an extended crime aspect, some drama, and a criminal investigation angle to it.
But the basis for it all won't escape the observations of any Canadian viewers, who were privy to news coverage throughout the 2000s.
Where the story dominated the news cycle.
The role played by Kate Moennig is also based on a real person, Dinah Taylor.
Who was Picton's main accomplice in the killings.
She would introduce Picton to many of his victims, in exchange for drugs.
Whose promise was the lure she'd use to get the girls to come to Picton's farm.
The woman who escapes from him at the beinning of the film is based on a real person, as well.
The pseudonymous "Ms. Anderson", who testified about escaping from Picton's farm in handcuffs at his trial.
While the Lulu character played by Christina Gonzalez is somewhat based on Monique Wood.
Another woman who would testify, about her interaction with Picton, at his trial.
In regards to production...sure, it's kind of a low budget effort, with heavy made-for-TV vibes.
As if it were a Lifetime movie, or something like that.
But the acting in it is surprisingly decent, across the board.
And it does have a subtly creepy vibe going for it.
But it's not overtly scary.
And acts more like a biopic, than it does a horror.
I also love how they make the unsung hero, of the whole ordeal, iconic Canadian actor Graham Greene.
Who does a great job as the doctor, whose observations break open the case.
While by no means a masterpiece, in any conceivable facet.
It's certainly a competent, and entertaining, low budget biopic.
That is likely to resonate with Canadian viewers.
Even if American viewers aren't able to recognize the connections to the actual case.
The bit where the pigs maul the dude is hilariously absurd though.
4.5 out of 10.
Peacock has actually made some decent original content. Both TV series and movies. But this was sooo bad. Like embarrassing awful. I had watched some previous Peacock originals and was surprisingly impressed. Then I saw some recognizable names in this movie: Amos from The Expanse, Juice from Sons of Anarchy, Tyrese.. should be decent enough right? Wrong. Have I met the ridiculous minimum character standards yet? No? Ok fine, 170 more to go... The writers must have been fresh college grads because this movie was cookie cutter from the jump. Dialogue was less than amateur. Film lens was cheap. Clearly low budget. Character limit met. This movie sucked.
Highly unoriginal! The plot is exactly what you get from the description and nothing more.
It is one of those movies that are painfully to watch and you keep checking the run time to see just how much more you have to endure. It really is a test of patience and will, one that I passed barely, with some breaks, checking the phone and rolling my eyes about 100 times.
I simply found nothing to like about it, it's not even so bad it's good, no horror, action, tension, interesting characters, dialogue, just a freaking bone would have suffice. Sadly, no such thing here. And what is happening with Tyrese Gibson, how did he end up hin this one. I don't consider him a good actor but surely he can do better than this. He had made a name for himself.
Anyway, back to Squealer. Such a waste of time really, if any effort was put into this, I don't know where it went. Very dry movie that leaves you with that memorable quote 'I'm not gonna get these 90 minutes back'.
Cheers!
It is one of those movies that are painfully to watch and you keep checking the run time to see just how much more you have to endure. It really is a test of patience and will, one that I passed barely, with some breaks, checking the phone and rolling my eyes about 100 times.
I simply found nothing to like about it, it's not even so bad it's good, no horror, action, tension, interesting characters, dialogue, just a freaking bone would have suffice. Sadly, no such thing here. And what is happening with Tyrese Gibson, how did he end up hin this one. I don't consider him a good actor but surely he can do better than this. He had made a name for himself.
Anyway, back to Squealer. Such a waste of time really, if any effort was put into this, I don't know where it went. Very dry movie that leaves you with that memorable quote 'I'm not gonna get these 90 minutes back'.
Cheers!
Whilst the idea of another serial killer film doesn't bother me, the blatantly overuse of every b movie murder film cliche by the terrible writer does bother me very much.
Bearing in mind it is a straight to DVD / Streaming service movie, it still falls well below par of that segment of the market that is being currently driven by intelligent film students and people early in their careers who are learning to hone their craft, and.............they are doing it very well!!! Sadly unlike the makers of this movie.
It's a very staid and predictable storyline, no amazing twists and everything is predictable, it's almost like the writers just can't be bothered anymore with the ever growing crop of remakes.......and this rubbish. Come on writers, we your viewing public deserve better!
It is performed by actors that are usually good solid performers, finding them in some TV movies and also some of Amazon Primes best series. The trouble is the director seems to have really got the least out of his performers possible. In fact, maybe the director got the nearest toddler to direct it for him instead. Maybe he used the writers toddler to direct it as their skills seem to be about level after all.
The really sad thing is it wouldn't have taken much to turn this into a watchable movie, even a good one. In it's current state it is definitely one to avoid! Do not waste your hour and thirty plus minutes. Use it for something more exciting like watching paint dry.
Bearing in mind it is a straight to DVD / Streaming service movie, it still falls well below par of that segment of the market that is being currently driven by intelligent film students and people early in their careers who are learning to hone their craft, and.............they are doing it very well!!! Sadly unlike the makers of this movie.
It's a very staid and predictable storyline, no amazing twists and everything is predictable, it's almost like the writers just can't be bothered anymore with the ever growing crop of remakes.......and this rubbish. Come on writers, we your viewing public deserve better!
It is performed by actors that are usually good solid performers, finding them in some TV movies and also some of Amazon Primes best series. The trouble is the director seems to have really got the least out of his performers possible. In fact, maybe the director got the nearest toddler to direct it for him instead. Maybe he used the writers toddler to direct it as their skills seem to be about level after all.
The really sad thing is it wouldn't have taken much to turn this into a watchable movie, even a good one. In it's current state it is definitely one to avoid! Do not waste your hour and thirty plus minutes. Use it for something more exciting like watching paint dry.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizBefore this film was released, Barry Hertz of The Globe and Mail wrote that it "appears to be inspired by the crimes of Canadian murderer Robert Pickton." In May 2024, over six months after the film was released, Pickton was attacked in prison and later died from the attack at the end of the month.
- BlooperFemale cop walks around the station bra-less.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Squealer?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Визгун
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 17.463 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 40 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti