Natalie Hoflin
- The Mystery Woman
- (as Natalie Blair)
Michael Caffery
- Male Detective One
- (as Michael John-Caffery)
Recensioni in evidenza
Just finished watching your movie I.C.U and thought i would jump onto IMDb and tell horror movie fanatics what a awesome movie this is.
There is nothing i can fault with this movie.
Loved the actors, SFX and the story line.
It's hard to find a good horror/thriller with a good story line and i think you hit the nail on the head.
Loved the location and i think the way you shot it was clever and kept me engaged.
Also saw you had a second movie, i will definitely be hiring out this movie if it is as good as I.C.U (which i'm sure it will be).
There is nothing i can fault with this movie.
Loved the actors, SFX and the story line.
It's hard to find a good horror/thriller with a good story line and i think you hit the nail on the head.
Loved the location and i think the way you shot it was clever and kept me engaged.
Also saw you had a second movie, i will definitely be hiring out this movie if it is as good as I.C.U (which i'm sure it will be).
This really isn't that bad a film. Most of the ratings in here are polarising in the extreme.
If you can look beyond the poor cut aways to the murders, and the distorted sound at times, the acting in the main is fairly decent. Margot Robbie shows glimpses of what was to come later in her career with an overall decent performance here.
Story wise, it's straight forward. Kids spy on neighbour and see some 'odd' things going on in his flat, he finds out and seeks to teach them a lesson.
I would say the ending was a bit choppy, the flashback summary akin to the 'Saw' franchise was needless in all honesty, and only served to draw the film out by a minute or two.
Overall, certainly not the worst low budget film out there, and worth a watch.
If you can look beyond the poor cut aways to the murders, and the distorted sound at times, the acting in the main is fairly decent. Margot Robbie shows glimpses of what was to come later in her career with an overall decent performance here.
Story wise, it's straight forward. Kids spy on neighbour and see some 'odd' things going on in his flat, he finds out and seeks to teach them a lesson.
I would say the ending was a bit choppy, the flashback summary akin to the 'Saw' franchise was needless in all honesty, and only served to draw the film out by a minute or two.
Overall, certainly not the worst low budget film out there, and worth a watch.
Who cares if Aash Aaron's films are low budget? Who cares if ICU & Vigilante are only average films? They got out there didn't they? Both have been sold to worldwide distributors! And that is what makes a successful filmmaker wouldn't you say? Anyone can criticize, but few can actually put their guts on the line! Aash does, and sure his film's to date are only average on the scale, I'm sure like all artists he will get better per film? Was Divici brilliant the first painting he did? I doubt it.
Well done Aash, keep at it! WM
I am a member of the Gold Coast Film Support Group and proud to join them in their quest to promote local talent, even in their earliest stages.
Well done Aash, keep at it! WM
I am a member of the Gold Coast Film Support Group and proud to join them in their quest to promote local talent, even in their earliest stages.
I just want to say I am proud to be a fellow Australian filmmaker! Or better still a fellow Queensland filmmaker! Or better still an Australian, Queensland, Gold Coast filmmaker! We are rising to the top guys! Aash was one of the first independent genre filmmakers to just get out there and do it, and now there are loads of us following his lead! Vigilante and ICU are great! Well done Aash! We at the Gold Coast Filmmakers group support you! Cant wait for your next film Tormented Souls and hope to be a part of it! I have only made short films so far but features like you Aash are next on my list.
Deb
Deb
I checked all the reviews for this movie, just from curiosity and except a 3 and a 6, there are only 9s and 10s. HOW? This movie is absolutely terrible!
I sit and watched I.C.U. because I'm a big fan of Margot Robbie, the only actor that is actually ACTING in this "movie" (the reason I'm giving 2 instead of 1), by fast forwarding the filler moments, like the music montages.
The plot seems simple, but the director/writer wants to make it seem like it is complex, with disastrous results. The acting is over the top, Margot Robbie is used as a sex tool because of her beauty and even though almost nothing is predictable, it still feels stupid.
The "twist after twist" in the end makes absolutely no sense and shows that there were twists just for the sake of having them.
At least the movie made me wonder: do Australian people EVER close their curtains?
I sit and watched I.C.U. because I'm a big fan of Margot Robbie, the only actor that is actually ACTING in this "movie" (the reason I'm giving 2 instead of 1), by fast forwarding the filler moments, like the music montages.
The plot seems simple, but the director/writer wants to make it seem like it is complex, with disastrous results. The acting is over the top, Margot Robbie is used as a sex tool because of her beauty and even though almost nothing is predictable, it still feels stupid.
The "twist after twist" in the end makes absolutely no sense and shows that there were twists just for the sake of having them.
At least the movie made me wonder: do Australian people EVER close their curtains?
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis was the first time Margot Robbie was bound and gagged in a movie. She later appeared this way again in Focus - Niente è come sembra (2015), The Legend of Tarzan (2016) and Suicide Squad (2016).
- BlooperA police officer climbs to 'Level 36' of an apartment building, rings the doorbell, and asks the child who answers the door to tell her father he will be waiting downstairs, then leaves. The child asks how he bypassed the building security. More to the point, he had no reason to climb and descend 36 floors to pass a message when he could have used the entry phone system or even sent a text message.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Focus - Niente è come sembra (2015)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is I.C.U.?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.100.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 25min(85 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti