Quando una giovane coppia affitta una stanza nel loro spazioso loft a un'eccentrica e bellissima artista, presto vivono per pentirsene.Quando una giovane coppia affitta una stanza nel loro spazioso loft a un'eccentrica e bellissima artista, presto vivono per pentirsene.Quando una giovane coppia affitta una stanza nel loro spazioso loft a un'eccentrica e bellissima artista, presto vivono per pentirsene.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
A good watch. Enjoyed the role of Serena played by Lorin Doctor. Pretty good special effects, and a decent story. Would recommend to any horror/demon fans.
This show has just been released on the Full Moon streaming site. I recently re-subscribed. They were advertising this in the headline and when I saw the director's name, I figured I'd give it a chance. (He's responsible for some of the best Full Moon Productions).
There's something very entertaining about this. It's not deep, it's not so original, but it is very entertaining. That's all it really needs to be. I recommend it for fans of Full Moon and of horror series' in general.
The characters and the setting are near perfect and fun to watch.
There's something very entertaining about this. It's not deep, it's not so original, but it is very entertaining. That's all it really needs to be. I recommend it for fans of Full Moon and of horror series' in general.
The characters and the setting are near perfect and fun to watch.
...as in don't waste your time on this. Mercifully, this film is only 61 minutes long, so at least if you do happen to watch it, at least you won't be squandering too much of your life on it. The bad news is this story is so been-there-done-that it could have been told in a half-hour format. In fact, this story of a succubus-type demon has been told already in countless feature films before, and in quite a few horror anthology shows, also.
I'm giving it 3 stars instead of 1 for not wasting too much time telling its hackneyed story, and for having a bit of female nudity, too (I consider gratuitous female nudity to be a plus for any low-budget horror film).
I'm giving it 3 stars instead of 1 for not wasting too much time telling its hackneyed story, and for having a bit of female nudity, too (I consider gratuitous female nudity to be a plus for any low-budget horror film).
From a lower score do to short playtime, its a small cast, devilish flick taking place i guess in boston, a girl moves in a a share housing project, and thats why its called ''dont let her in''. She starts spreading her vibes all over the place, and everything is turned into ruin.
Its a classic wanna make a helloween flick urges from the director and production crew, seems like a speedsters run to the finish line, with a barely survivable storyline and average acting. The filmatographic techniques and music though works, and a horror novice would get jolted im sure.special effects are cheap but sensible, but not enough for the grumpy old man. Its a norewatch from me.
Its a classic wanna make a helloween flick urges from the director and production crew, seems like a speedsters run to the finish line, with a barely survivable storyline and average acting. The filmatographic techniques and music though works, and a horror novice would get jolted im sure.special effects are cheap but sensible, but not enough for the grumpy old man. Its a norewatch from me.
Not sure what I expected from this. Back in the day it would definitely have been straight to video, that's for sure.
The acting is...wooden. Yeah, that's the word. There's only 4 credited cast and only two of them are anything other than tokens. 10/10 for the men being the token fillers, mind. One delivers his lines like he's reading them off the wall. The other is...quite convincing because I suspect he's just being himself.
The ladies are considerably better, though as they carry the bulk of the script and action they need to be. Not just eye candy. While they're unlikely to trouble the Oscars committee, they deliver.
The script isn't great, the storyline is almost non existent but the effects are OK (pretty good for the budget, in fact) and the ending is neat.
Well shot. Well directed. Worth seeing if you're bored but don't expect horror or soft porn because it isn't either, really. Just a slightly supernatural thriller.
The acting is...wooden. Yeah, that's the word. There's only 4 credited cast and only two of them are anything other than tokens. 10/10 for the men being the token fillers, mind. One delivers his lines like he's reading them off the wall. The other is...quite convincing because I suspect he's just being himself.
The ladies are considerably better, though as they carry the bulk of the script and action they need to be. Not just eye candy. While they're unlikely to trouble the Oscars committee, they deliver.
The script isn't great, the storyline is almost non existent but the effects are OK (pretty good for the budget, in fact) and the ending is neat.
Well shot. Well directed. Worth seeing if you're bored but don't expect horror or soft porn because it isn't either, really. Just a slightly supernatural thriller.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe movie is split into two parts, which director Ted Nicolaou said was producer Charlie Band's idea, though he admitted he's not quite sure what Band hoped to gain from that decision.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Don't Let Her In?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Не впускай её
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 125.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti