[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

2050

  • 2018
  • 1h 46min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,8/10
1343
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Stefanie Bloom in 2050 (2018)
Trailer 1
Riproduci trailer1: 02
2 video
99+ foto
DrammaFantascienzaFantascienza distopicaFantasiaIntelligenza artificiale

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA family man struggling to hold it all together discovers a hidden parlor that offers a solution...sexbots.A family man struggling to hold it all together discovers a hidden parlor that offers a solution...sexbots.A family man struggling to hold it all together discovers a hidden parlor that offers a solution...sexbots.

  • Regia
    • Princeton Holt
  • Sceneggiatura
    • Brian Ackley
    • Princeton Holt
    • David Vaughn
  • Star
    • David Vaughn
    • Irina Abraham
    • Devin Fuller
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    3,8/10
    1343
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Princeton Holt
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Brian Ackley
      • Princeton Holt
      • David Vaughn
    • Star
      • David Vaughn
      • Irina Abraham
      • Devin Fuller
    • 38Recensioni degli utenti
    • 13Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
    • Premi
      • 16 vittorie totali

    Video2

    Trailer [EN]
    Trailer 1:01
    Trailer [EN]
    2050
    Trailer 1:02
    2050
    2050
    Trailer 1:02
    2050

    Foto587

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 583
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali91

    Modifica
    David Vaughn
    David Vaughn
    • Michael Greene
    Irina Abraham
    Irina Abraham
    • Brooke Greene
    Devin Fuller
    Devin Fuller
    • Drew
    Dean Cain
    Dean Cain
    • Maxwell
    Stefanie Bloom
    Stefanie Bloom
    • Sophia
    Stormi Maya
    Stormi Maya
    • Quin
    Shannone Holt
    • Reign Regan
    Hope Blackstock
    Hope Blackstock
    • Alli
    Chris Riquinha
    • David
    Jace Nicole
    Jace Nicole
    • Diana
    Jonathan Ercolino
    • Cameron
    Juliana Corsetti
    • Georgia
    • (voce)
    Ben Bott
    • Atticus
    • (voce)
    Gregory Rawrysz
    Gregory Rawrysz
    • Parlor Bartender
    Merrill Joseffer
    • Parlor Hostess
    Jor el Jordan
    • Juice Bar Patron
    Billy Marshall Jr.
    • Rudy the Bartender
    Jerry Hebrank
    Jerry Hebrank
    • Business Investor
    • Regia
      • Princeton Holt
    • Sceneggiatura
      • Brian Ackley
      • Princeton Holt
      • David Vaughn
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti38

    3,81.3K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    tetrahex

    Too afraid of the subject to say anything interesting about it.

    The film takes an interesting premise and plays it inoffensively as possible, and drags the thin plot over far too long of a run time. If this was a short youtube scifi short it might have been bearable, but at full length its just wasted potential.
    BarneyGrapes

    Acting:5, directing:5, occasional flashes of insight:10

    I really struggled rating this one. I have a softspot for any nice cinematography set in New York City. Don't know why, have never been there. Just something so human and organic about that city.

    As for acting: some really really bad, most slightly below average, and occasionally excellent. Same for directing.

    The main companion robot was really good in her role. The others were fine. There was some unevenness in how the director saw their movements and expressions. Maybe he could explain it off as older and newer models. The companion to the main protagonist seemed more natural, but with a slight emptiness in the eyes. The other models felt very artificial.

    And finally to what drags my rating way up to 7, which most wont agree with it deserving for good reasons. But I just had to give it some reward for a couple things it does very well.

    It doesn't get too deep. It's not a complicated highly metaphysical issue. It's an issue we are currently facing, just in a different form. Devices. Loss of human contact and meaningful interaction. Inability to know how to interact.

    On the flip side, they make the very valid point that we overcomplicate the meaning we give to sexual devices. Our social conditioning adds way too much subtext (you need the device or the roll play because Im not enough, you don't trust me enough, etc...).

    Finally, there is a brilliant comment near the end (non-spoiler, it doesn't impact the outcome or story of the film). It involves releasing sterile insects into a population to help control or eradicate that population. A simple comment, but one the writers were brilliant to see and make the connection to sex bots.

    So I don't want to over emphasize this film and say it's amazing. It's more of a film with a lot of lost potential. In the right hands, with the right director, and some cleaning up of the script and dialogue, it could be an excellent film. Not ground breaking, but good. But again, some people may find it too simplistic. I loved the simplicity.

    And we certainly can't fault those who struggle to get through this film. They have good reason.

    Last note: the ending dialogue is excellent, however, it ultimately ends flat.
    5troy-boulton

    Not Dean Cain's worst film in the last decade

    It's not a new premise by any measure, but the narrative and dialogue has enough originality to hold some interest. There are moments of brilliance in the cinematography, like islands in a sea of low budget mediocrity. "Futurising" the present by dropping in the odd cheesy special effect really doesn't work; either go all the way, or be way more subtle. This is just disjointed world-building that drops the viewer out of the story.

    The acting and dialogue is like the cinematography. Inconsistent. Moments of beauty and powerful nuance, drowning in acres of awkward and stilted.

    I'm glad Dean can still get work. I've always had a soft spot for him. He's not a great actor, and his 50+ years sans A-grade Hollywood cosmetic surgery/stylist/nutritionist/trainer budget are showing, but he seems like such a nice guy. He deserves a shot, and this film shows not all hope is lost.
    4fagurado

    Sort of interesting, but amateurish at times

    It is an entertaining film, although it doesn't explore the topic in depth - the subject of the film is "people spending more time with robots than with humans", but the implications of that are never really explored, at least no more than it would be if we were talking about people dating other people because they are more excited about the perspective of dating somewhere more attractive than their current partners. Acting is okay, but it can be rough at some points, making it feel like a low-budget production.

    But hey, you get to see Stormi Maya naked, and you don't have to pay to subscribe to her OnlyFans. Nudity is always a plus.
    Andrew-Props

    Ehhhhhh!

    With the exception of Dean Cain, the acting was not very good, the soundtrack was silly and the actor playing the brother was awful and seemed gay. (Not there there is anything wrong with that!) The concept for the film is a good one but the dialogue seemed unnatural, the music was distracting and overall this movie was a waste of time! The only difference in the future in New York City seems to be drones.... Lots of drones!!!

    I think this could have been a much better movie in spite of being low budget... maybe the writer and director learn from this movie and do better next time... just like Ed Wood said! 😁🎥🎬

    Altri elementi simili

    Wifelike
    4,9
    Wifelike
    Cattle: The Cult
    3,4
    Cattle: The Cult
    Maid Droid
    3,7
    Maid Droid
    Air BNB
    3,5
    Air BNB
    Future Sex
    5,6
    Future Sex
    30 Days 30 Sex
    8,1
    30 Days 30 Sex
    Anything for You, Abby
    7,1
    Anything for You, Abby
    The Wishing Forest
    3,0
    The Wishing Forest
    Heaux Phase
    8,1
    Heaux Phase
    2050
    6,7
    2050
    Lovers
    8,3
    Lovers
    It Hungers
    4,8
    It Hungers

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Stefanie Bloom believes that many of the topics addressed in the film will be real before the eponymous year of 2050.
    • Citazioni

      Alli: If you control the people, you control the world. They tried everything they could to try to control us. Because they know we are emotional people. They tried to divide us by playing on our emotions. You know why, right? Because, if you keep the people emotional and angry you distract them from building their own financial empires and taking care of their families, and their family's families. I mean, think about it, bro. First you program people emotionally, right? Next you destroy their health. The best way to do that is through the food and water supply. I mean, Henry Kissinger snitched on the whole operation. He said, "If you control the oil, you control the country." "And if you control the food, you control the population." So now we've been programmed to rely on microchips more than we rely on each other. We no longer talk to each other, we only follow each other online, what? But this, this is the remedy. This is how we get back to our roots. This is how we bring humanity back to our essence, I mean, guys, oh. Just take this.

    • Connessioni
      References I pronipoti (1962)
    • Colonne sonore
      What We're Left With
      by Konstantinos Lyrakis

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti15

    • How long is 2050?Powered by Alexa

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 14 gennaio 2020 (Stati Uniti)
    • Paesi di origine
      • Cina
      • Stati Uniti
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Robot de compañia
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Long Island City, New York, Stati Uniti
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Be Your Own Hollywood
      • Butterfly Chasers
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      1 ora 46 minuti
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Digital
      • D-Cinema 96kHz 5.1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.