VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,3/10
27.673
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Dopo che un'entità di origine misteriosa ha annientato la popolazione mondiale costringendo coloro che la osservano a togliersi la vita, Sebastián e sua figlia iniziano la loro grande avvent... Leggi tuttoDopo che un'entità di origine misteriosa ha annientato la popolazione mondiale costringendo coloro che la osservano a togliersi la vita, Sebastián e sua figlia iniziano la loro grande avventura di sopravvivenza a Barcellona.Dopo che un'entità di origine misteriosa ha annientato la popolazione mondiale costringendo coloro che la osservano a togliersi la vita, Sebastián e sua figlia iniziano la loro grande avventura di sopravvivenza a Barcellona.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 candidature totali
Jorge Asín
- Marcial
- (as Jorge Asin)
Recensioni in evidenza
The first movie was insultingly stupid filler, made watchable by Sandy Bullock. But Georgina Campbell is in this one and I thought she might bring something fresh to the screen. I was wrong. It's a basic retread, with all the same logical brain-hurts of the first movie, only brain-hurtier.
Mario Casas, a good actor, plays a boring man who is boring. He is escorting a kid through the post-apocalyptic streetssjc#'gch... sorry, I got bored of typing. You know the plot. It's Plot Number 1 from the Big Book of Plots - a bunch of generic humans stumble through derivative scenes until one of them gets yeeted in a flourish of Adobe After Effects plugins.
Do not expect suspense or horror. The director does not know what these things are. The sci-fi elements are completely ignored, so if you've seen the first one, there's nothing new here.
The score is shockingly bad, ever-present and thematically stagnant throughout the entire runtime. The dual-language Spanish setting could have worked well, but they do absolutely nothing with it.
The whole thing reeks of tax breaks. Somewhere, in a Netflix boardroom, people with expensive habits are very pleased with themselves.
Mario Casas, a good actor, plays a boring man who is boring. He is escorting a kid through the post-apocalyptic streetssjc#'gch... sorry, I got bored of typing. You know the plot. It's Plot Number 1 from the Big Book of Plots - a bunch of generic humans stumble through derivative scenes until one of them gets yeeted in a flourish of Adobe After Effects plugins.
Do not expect suspense or horror. The director does not know what these things are. The sci-fi elements are completely ignored, so if you've seen the first one, there's nothing new here.
The score is shockingly bad, ever-present and thematically stagnant throughout the entire runtime. The dual-language Spanish setting could have worked well, but they do absolutely nothing with it.
The whole thing reeks of tax breaks. Somewhere, in a Netflix boardroom, people with expensive habits are very pleased with themselves.
The production and acting are not that bad, that's the good news, the bad: the story unfolding is a total bore besides some action sequences here and there, which are okay but nothing remarkable. Somewhat the whole affair reminds me of a mediocre episode of The Walking Dead, one of those last few seasons. In short: Bird Box: Barcelona is no match for the original starring Sandra Bullock, which is a very suspenseful movie with some strong emotional scenes. But this one is simply one of those fast produced mass products that will be forgotten fast and fall (rightfully) into the void of all those trash movies produced for streaming services these days. A legit sequel to the original one? No. Just a cash grabber aiming at the Spanish speaking audience. Final verdict: solid produced boredom.
The problem with this movie is that it shouldn't be a movie. If this was a show with a proper start (like the first movie), an interesting twist with character development (like the 2nd movie) and a finale (a potential 3rd movie) it would've been a straightup banger. But because it's not a complete story, leaves too much story out and has no proper direction to go in other than the characters in both movies sharing the same goal of reaching a safe location.
Things they could've done to make it better:
What I liked about the movie:
I feel like it had a lot of potential and hype but didn't deliver since both movies were extremely mediocre in the end.
Things they could've done to make it better:
- Made a 12 episode show out of it instead with a start and ending;
- More interesting character progression;
- More backstory;
- More interesting villain(s).
What I liked about the movie:
- Concept is good;
- Lots of suspension;
- Great locations;
- Good videography.
I feel like it had a lot of potential and hype but didn't deliver since both movies were extremely mediocre in the end.
I was really looking forward to this, and whilst it's an okay thriller, it's got alot to live up to and fails to hit the mark.
The storyline is clever, acting is good, however it feels after watching it that the actual premise of the story is quite weak, and was infact carried by the actors of the first one, in particular Miss Sandra Bullock.
I will admit that it was good to see another scenario outcome of the outbreak, and the city of Barcelona was a good decision, the last 5 minutes of the film kinda made me want another sequal, but all in all an extremely mediocre film that's ridden on the coat tails of its predecessor.
The storyline is clever, acting is good, however it feels after watching it that the actual premise of the story is quite weak, and was infact carried by the actors of the first one, in particular Miss Sandra Bullock.
I will admit that it was good to see another scenario outcome of the outbreak, and the city of Barcelona was a good decision, the last 5 minutes of the film kinda made me want another sequal, but all in all an extremely mediocre film that's ridden on the coat tails of its predecessor.
Okay, not a groundbreaking watch, but certainly not deserving of close to 5.
If you like the birdbox idea and enjoyed the first then you'll enjoy this. Don't be put off by the score because it's way overly harsh! The comments regarding the CGI again I think aren't fair, I can't say having watched it I noticed anything off about them.
The plot is decent, acting good, I think the ending does let it down a little in reality.
Overall it was better than I expected it to be given the other harsh reviews. The scales certainly less than the original but definitely give it a go. Hope more from this series to follow.
If you like the birdbox idea and enjoyed the first then you'll enjoy this. Don't be put off by the score because it's way overly harsh! The comments regarding the CGI again I think aren't fair, I can't say having watched it I noticed anything off about them.
The plot is decent, acting good, I think the ending does let it down a little in reality.
Overall it was better than I expected it to be given the other harsh reviews. The scales certainly less than the original but definitely give it a go. Hope more from this series to follow.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizMichelle Jenner (Dr Liliana) also stared as Keila in Berlin, the Netflix Money Heist spin-off series.
- BlooperIt is not necessary to take a cable car to the Montjuic Castle. You can easily get there by several roads and walking paths.
And it is not a remote place at all. They don't say where the main quest starts, but is seems to be somewhere within l'Eixample part of Barcelona. From the farthest point in l'Eixample, to the north, it would be less than a three hour walk to get to the castle.
- ConnessioniSpin-off from Bird Box (2018)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Bird Box: Barcelona?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Bird Box: Barcelona
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 52min(112 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti