VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,8/10
8775
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaIn 1905, revolutionist Sun Yat-Sen visits Hong Kong to discuss plans with Tongmenghui members to overthrow the Qing dynasty. But when they find out that assassins have been sent to kill him,... Leggi tuttoIn 1905, revolutionist Sun Yat-Sen visits Hong Kong to discuss plans with Tongmenghui members to overthrow the Qing dynasty. But when they find out that assassins have been sent to kill him, they assemble a group of protectors to prevent any attacks.In 1905, revolutionist Sun Yat-Sen visits Hong Kong to discuss plans with Tongmenghui members to overthrow the Qing dynasty. But when they find out that assassins have been sent to kill him, they assemble a group of protectors to prevent any attacks.
- Premi
- 25 vittorie e 53 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
This is NOT Hollywood type Kick-Ass. This is NOT an Arty House of Daggeers.
This is a historical drama with some neat kung-fu thrown in. Beautiful to look at. From the elegance of the costumes to the dirty streets in the ghetto.
Bodyguards and Assassins has charm, tragedy, drama, loyalty, respect, ignorance and more going for it. Slightly long but thoroughly enjoyable.
I was unaware of this part of Chinas history (boy do the English come off bad yet again) and I'm glad I watched it.
This is a historical drama with some neat kung-fu thrown in. Beautiful to look at. From the elegance of the costumes to the dirty streets in the ghetto.
Bodyguards and Assassins has charm, tragedy, drama, loyalty, respect, ignorance and more going for it. Slightly long but thoroughly enjoyable.
I was unaware of this part of Chinas history (boy do the English come off bad yet again) and I'm glad I watched it.
I had been looking forward to seeing this movie as the advertising had billed it as something of a period epic, something along the lines of a Hong Kong "Gangs of New York".
I have to say that the sets and reconstruction of 1906 Hong Kong were very good, but there were some occasions where the matte backgrounds didn't quite gel with the foreground.
The story on the whole was very good, with the key characters either learning or demonstrating the link between sacrifice and revolution. However I think this movie loses effectiveness by trying to do too much.
For a film such as this which tries to be a historical epic, the wire-fu stunts look incredibly out of place. It would have been far more effective to keep the stunts grounded in reality. The wire-fu stunts work well in films such as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Hero where there is an element of fantasy to the whole story. For a story that is purportedly a historical account all it serves to do is remind the viewer that he is watching a movie, not real events.
I also found the inclusion of Mengke Bateer off-putting. A seven-foot Chinese in 1906 Hong Kong doesn't seem very believable to me. I suspect that he was put there to get a few cheap jokes, as the character would have been just as believable as a six-foot well-built person.
These may seem like minor issues, but for me they detracted from what could have been a truly excellent film.
I have to say that the sets and reconstruction of 1906 Hong Kong were very good, but there were some occasions where the matte backgrounds didn't quite gel with the foreground.
The story on the whole was very good, with the key characters either learning or demonstrating the link between sacrifice and revolution. However I think this movie loses effectiveness by trying to do too much.
For a film such as this which tries to be a historical epic, the wire-fu stunts look incredibly out of place. It would have been far more effective to keep the stunts grounded in reality. The wire-fu stunts work well in films such as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Hero where there is an element of fantasy to the whole story. For a story that is purportedly a historical account all it serves to do is remind the viewer that he is watching a movie, not real events.
I also found the inclusion of Mengke Bateer off-putting. A seven-foot Chinese in 1906 Hong Kong doesn't seem very believable to me. I suspect that he was put there to get a few cheap jokes, as the character would have been just as believable as a six-foot well-built person.
These may seem like minor issues, but for me they detracted from what could have been a truly excellent film.
The film was well made, and Hong Kong was restored to be very real at that time, and the characterization was also very full. The role of Sun Wen is the most innovative, almost all indirect description, but every stroke is in place. There were two times when tears almost fell down. They were all the roles played by Nicholas Tse. The simple and single-minded man really moved me most.
I have seen every major Chinese film over the last forty years and I have lived and worked in China for over a decade. I know a little about China. This film, of course, has little to do with the actual events of the Chinese Revolution of 1911 and the ascendancy of Sun Yat-Sen. However, it does capture the emotion involved by the true Chinese revolutionaries of the time. The Chinese Revoluton predated the well-known (to the West) Russian Revolution of 1917, which has been dramatized in dozens of films in the West; most notably Reds and Dr. Zhivago. However, few Westerners know anything about the Great Chinese Revolution that ended over 3000 years of dynastic rule in China. This makes the Russian Revolution look like a current even by comparison. Millions of lives were lost in the Russian Revolution, but tens of millions of lives were lost in the Chinese Revolution. The film is loaded with action; too much action and gore according to several responsible reviewers. This would appeal to some, but many will be turned off by the excessive violence and unlikely scenarios. Despite these drawbacks, the film arrests your attention, and the several fine character performances draw you into the film until it's Shakespearian ending (not everybody dies like in Hamlet, but close to it). The movie is beautifully directed and the technical achievements are first-rate. The film makes The Wild Bunch look like a Disney Movie in comparison. Several of the other gigantic blockbuster action films of China also pale in comparison, such as Red Cliff, Hidden Dragon, Hero, and several others. In battle scenes of those films, the killing is impersonal and the audience has little emotional attachment to the combatants. That is not true in this film, however. The audience gets to know several of the bodyguards through various devices used by the director. And so, their battle scenes have much more significance; much like the characters in The Magnificent Seven. A good lesson on Chinese History as long as you do not take the action sequences as fact.
Very disappointing film. This film last's 138 min. In my opinion it was at least 45 min too long. I find it a overlong film!. i think it had too little action. When a action showed up, i think it was poor. Even the drama and story was very boring. I think it should be renamed to Boringguards and Assassins. I like some Drama films and TV series, but i think this was not any good Drama.
I think the camera angles and editing also was poor. It was hard to follow the action. I thought this film would be action packed, considering Donnie was in it. I don't think it was. With all that money, how could they make such a bad film? I don't know how they managed to do that. Also, Donnie wears a silly unconvincing bald-cap making his head look like a watermelon. Hahaa.
It has only max 15 min of action out of 138 min. I felt cheated since, before it was released it was promoted as having 1 hour of action. More drama film than action film. I will never watch this film again. See only this if you like a boring drama film with very little action. Watch Ip Man instead, than this junk. I think it does at least have much better, story, acting, and fight scenes
I think the camera angles and editing also was poor. It was hard to follow the action. I thought this film would be action packed, considering Donnie was in it. I don't think it was. With all that money, how could they make such a bad film? I don't know how they managed to do that. Also, Donnie wears a silly unconvincing bald-cap making his head look like a watermelon. Hahaa.
It has only max 15 min of action out of 138 min. I felt cheated since, before it was released it was promoted as having 1 hour of action. More drama film than action film. I will never watch this film again. See only this if you like a boring drama film with very little action. Watch Ip Man instead, than this junk. I think it does at least have much better, story, acting, and fight scenes
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDuring the fight between Donnie Yen's character against the henchman (played by Cung Le), the latter was killed by a sharp object cutting across his neck. In "Once Upon a Time in China II" (also starring Donnie Yen), Yen's character was also killed by a sharp object cutting across his neck.
- BlooperWhen Donnie Yen's character dies, he is hit by Jun Hu's character's horse. Immediately after he is hit, the scene is cut to Jun Hu running on foot towards Yen's body. Where did the horse go?
- ConnessioniRemake of Chi dan hao han (1974)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Bodyguards and Assassins?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- The October Siege
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 23.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 6.604.537 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 19min(139 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti