Django

But it's not.

Assuming you have HDR on your TV and you can see what is happening...

The story is convoluted and the flashbacks not handled very well.

The acting is very variable, even by the recognised names.

While the photography is good, it does not make up for the bad acting. Characters performances vary between wooden to manic.

And the accents. Very poor, especially Ms Rapace, most distracting.

The Django character has appeared in several spaghetti westerns over the last fifty years. This series does follow in the established genre but has sacrificed clarity for pretentiousness.

If they make a remake, remember to turn the lights on.

It's hard to take this show seriously, especially when the character Elizabeth speaks...I finally realised - she sounds like Moira from Schitts Creek when she does her weird accent trying to buy a car. It unintentionally turns the show into a comedy. At least a laugh is a welcome break from the tedious plot. A carefully curated slow moving show can be riveting, this is...well, boring. Churning out a lot of yawn worthy and trivial tropes, between more odd accents and attempting to draw out "secrets" that are unsurprising and lazy. More than one accent in the show changes within a sentence, creating a sense of disorientation in terms of where the story is meant to be set or where the hell anyone is from.

Obviously the expectation for celebrities to remain youthful looking is unreasonable and sad. I apologise to the actress, as I don't mean to be picking on her, but again, Noomi Rapace, who plays Elizabeth, has clearly overdone the cheek filler to the point that it is obviously misshapen in the first episode. Getting filler to the point of deformity and a very unnatural shape is sad to see.

The best part about the show is the surprise (to me) appearance of Abigail Thorn, of Philosophy Tube renown. Abigail shines in her role and breaks up the otherwise lacklustre performances.

I am struggling through episode 3 and really finding it hard to continue to see it out.

Actually, I awarded this series a total of eight stars but I chose to use white ones for the last six as an homage to art.

If world famous paintings like "Black Cat at Midnight in a Coal Bin" tickles your fancy then you'll not want to miss a riveting second of this attempt at art. For me, however, I don't think I should have to sit in a completely dark room and strain my eyes to watch a made for TV series.

Once again the choice to record in visible light (because, well, we can now) was chosen over allowing the audience the opportunity to actually be able to follow the story instead of needing to guess who that shadow actually is and what is he (or she) doing. I threw in the towel after, roughly, fifteen minutes of this and moved on to something else.

Noomi rapace actually does suck in her role, what was she thinking?, absolute terrible 'accent', could she really not know this?, is she really this vacuous?, I guess!, many others have said the scenes are too dark, very true, in the dark scenes some of the cast cannot be seen, ?, the writer and the director are terrible, it's just not worthy of watching, kind of a fever dream, funny, the names of those involved in writing and directing seem to be Italian, is this a satire of the old spaghetti westerns?, is that it?, I just gave up in the middle of episode two, skip this disaster of a dumb show.

First of all anyone who knows the landscape and climate of Texas can clearly tell from the first shot the set is NOT in Texas. Too many mountain ranges and the climate is way too wet for Texas. They actually filmed this show in Romania. Secondly, the majority of the characters are European with audacious American accents. It's just not believable. Thirdly, the story is so disjointed, it was hard to follow. The writer and director's attempts to modernize a Western failed because the characters just weren't likeable. Because of that the theme of the evils of religious extremism and racism falls flat. Sorry, I only made it to episode 3 and called it quits.