Recensioni degli utenti

I cant stand movies where things just don't make sense. When plot armor is used then common sense isn't used. Frustrating when things happen that just dont make sense. All signs of a poor director cant tell a story. Gina (and i like her) didnt put in the best performance. Just because I'm rooting for these daily wire movies doesnt mean we shouldn't hold them to a decent standard. Ive never seen so many bad shots or decisions not to shoot when anyone would shoot just because of plot.

I would say this is a very frustrating movie.

If you expected Gina Carano or Matthias Hues to kick ass or Nick Searcy to act, you will be sorely disappointed. Instead you will get Carano as a mother of two sitting in a lone house waiting for her husband when a band of sadistic ex soldiers come and attempt to capture her. I don't know how military service was back then, but five armed men should have done the job in five minutes. Instead, they try to wiggle themselves into the house, trick the woman, wait her out, convince her, etc.

That's the entire film. It feels more like a really bad date than a western. And poor Hues. How the mighty have fallen...

Lemme just say, I love that Daily Wire is getting into entertainment. I've been a subscriber for over a year, and I'm not leaving any time soon. However, this movie is not good.

I'll start with a few positives. The movie looks pretty good, and I think the decision to go with no score was a good one. There are some exciting moments, but overall, the movie really failed to excite me.

Now the bad. The characters here are so paper thin, that I find it hard to really care how things turn out for them. The arcs are so generic and predictable, that they might as well not even be there. The villain is very cliché, riding around spitting intimidating Bible verses and scalping people. However, he is probably the best thing in the movie.

The acting is competent, but fails to sell me on anything deeper than surface level emotions like fear or anger. The plot drags on for way too long, considering the fact that nothing really happens. On top of this, Spoiler Alert (though not really), we are treated to another feel-good ending where everything turns out perfectly for the characters without having to sacrifice anything, which is so frustrating.

Watching this movie made me realize the pattern that is forming with DailyWire movies. They all follow "strong, independent" female characters who either have to rescue the men who are incompetent, or defeat the men who are evil. If I want the feminist messaging, I can go to Hollywood, they have plenty of that. This is supposed to be DailyWire, a company that stands for traditional values and against the wokeness of Hollywood.

If it were one or two movies from them, I wouldn't have a problem. Hell, movies like Alien that follow strong female protagonists are some of my favorites of all time. I just want some variety from DW, especially in an era where masculine man are increasingly rarer and under attack.

We are four movies in with DailyWire and they are yet to make a movie that is particularly interesting. Shut In is still the high water mark for them, but even that was only ok. So yeah, strong 4/10, not good.

I love westerns and wanted to love this one but, like the previous film Shut In, there are just far too many stupid choices and, in this case, bad shots, So many bullets fired, so few targets hit. Frustrating.

This was...very slow. Very very slow. Even by 1970's western standards, it's slow. It seems to be the trend now for westerns to move at a snail's pace. If you compare it to "The Power of the Dog", they're about even though this movie has some action sequences, they both dwell on things a lot longer than they should. In "The Power of the Dog" they tried to be profound, and though they didn't achieve that goal, this movie wasn't even trying to be profound.

The lighting was shockingly bad. About as bad as the acting. Sound design and set dec was fine. Directing was lackluster. (For example, there are some shots that get punched in on with an insert to make sure you don't forget a key piece of exposition...and I do always prefer exposition that is shown rather than said, but at least work it into the shot you're using and for God's sake, don't return to the same shot once it's done.)

I mean, I guess if it's on in the background while you do something else, it's fine. Please don't ever give Donald "Cowboy" Cerrone lines in a movie ever again though.

Good as westerns go, but, seriously, way too many missed opportunities to just justifiably shoot them and no explanations or excuses not to.

I suppose that's standard for movies, but I keep hoping for better.

I wanted to give 10/10 so bad- love these people, but there was no family chemistry and it was too slow. It felt both over And under-acted at times. Do more, keep going, but this was a little bit of a let down.

This was a truly terrible movie.

There's a thin plot and almost zero chemistry/connection between the characters.

It also doesn't help that it has Gina Carano that is such a horrible actress that has two facial expressions she can use. Might be 2 stars without her but here we go: 1 star.

I got to say, I thought I had already outgrown and seen everything possible that could be done with this kind of genre of movie, but I was pleasantly surprised.

Terror on the Prairie is definitely not a movie for everyone. More now than a few years back. It's raw, it's simple, it feels real, it even sounds real because of the simple fact that there's barely any soundtrack at all.

If you're someone that judges movies based on the hundreds of millions of dollars in special effects, then this is definitely not a movie for you. This is a movie for those that want to feel the past. That same past that brought us to this point.

The performances were solid and the movie didn't rely on any single character. Mainly because it was aiming to feel and look real, and not some fantasy where some Mary Sue or Gary Stu can just take on everyone singlehandedly. Even the lack of soundtrack serves to put you in that mindset. The silence that accompanies the movie in the slowest scenes, is really to show viewers how were those times. How slow placed life could be when the shores were done, and there was nothing else to do.

The film does pick up the pace after some time, and after that it's a race to the finish line. But that race is correctly paced so the viewer is not overwhelmed, or loses important details.

It's a very good movie, that is showing the viewer a different time that our ancestors went through. And although it could've taken advantage of the obvious north and south division, to land some political message like Hollywood movies try to do in every single movie, it avoided that mistake making it clear that the events were about those people in that land, in that time.

It just isn't an excellent movie, because unfortunately sometimes the slow pace does numb you out a little bit. But considering it isn't a Hollywood movie with hundreds of millions of dollars in budget, it manages to deliver a more interesting overall result than many more recent movies.

I'm actually very satisfied to have seen this movie, and I'll definitely recommend it as a must watch to all those that want to have a taste of the past.

Another aspect that might drive some people away, is the very real raw brutality of it all. Remember that these were the frontier times, when the law was mostly decided by the gun, and what you had was many times things others would take without any hesitation or problems of conscience. So if you're expecting this movie to soften up what was the brutal reality of those times, you're going to find out just how good you have in these current times.

And there lies a lesson I think. Because nowadays too many people have grown so accustomed to fighting for nothing, they have to make up things to fight about. But in those times you didn't had to come up with things to fight about... Life was a daily fight. And people had no time to waste on pointless endeavors.

This movie will definitely go to my collection. And is one of the rare cinematic gems of 2022.

Good thing - the movie has some nice cinematography even though the palette is a bit dull. The bad - plot holes and Gina cannot act.

Story is simple the protagonists are simple though some may argue she unnecessarily provoked the fight alone instead of waiting for husband. In her defense it was revealed during the fight that the baddies were after her husband. The movie had some tense moments but quickly fell in the heroes favor. Overall a slow burner with built up suspense until it collapsed faster than expected.

But DW honestly needs to think about Gina's acting she was wooden almost the whole time. She is a genuine strong woman with genuine MMA skills and hence they need to cast her as such and not for her acting skills which need to improve by a lot. (She did exhibit the strength needed but was unconvincing since it was not played to her real strength)

One time watch but wishing DW luck. And oh...please tone down a bit on the christian themes and values...nothing wrong in it but I am part of a diverse audience who are in the fight against woke but not a christian myself.

If you want to be bored by this pitiful excuse for a movie then you will for sure love "Terror on the Prairie." This movie is devoid of anything that makes modern cinema any bit interesting. Horrible casting, dull and tired acting, and worst of all it isn't even a good western movie. I wouldn't even consider this a western movie because its so bad that i started watching Star Trek because it felt more like a western movie than this sorry excuse for a movie. Do not watch this movie if you value your money and sanity. To the studio and directors of this movie. Quit. If you want to be bored to death then go ahead and watch this movie, an alternative that is more exhilarating is watching oil paint dry.

Going in to this movie I was rooting for the Daily Wire. In the hopes of seeing what is still a recognizable podcast and twitter personalities expand their talent into a tough nut to crack profession. And for that, I wish them well. This movie, which I had some higher hopes for, yet quite abated since the cast was not one known for good western movies, will not help them cracking that professional nut. Don't it wrong I like Gina Carano and she did a good job, Daniel Day-Lewis son in the movie did and excellent job. And I'm glad to see it film in Montana. But a couple of good actors and majestic scenery does not maketh a movie. The story meandered for a few minutes, then got confusing, it got really strange when missed opportunities were ignored, and at the point of climax it all sputtered in a heap of a wet burlap bag. This is not the rebel movie of How Hollywood Should Make Westerns because if that was a title it would have read "How Hollywood Should Not Make Westerns." You can get through it; I got through it; the genuine criticism that is out and is taken into consideration can make a fine wester from the Daily Wire-- I'm quite positive of it. If you are really having a western itch that stunned me in quality and story then do yourself a favor and see "Old Henry" with Tim Blake Nelson. This is the one that TDW should have in its sights and are aiming for. I'd always be up for another try from them.

From the opening scene, I was surprised at how well-directed this film is. Both dramatic and action-heavy scenes are well-framed and the actions and reactions of the characters are always the focus of the visual storytelling. It makes for an exciting watch!

Additionally, the performances are all quite great. Gina Cyrano probably gives her best performance, and she definitely carries this film with heart and grit.

The writing is much more hit-and-miss. The character introductions are very well-handled and set both the central family and the villains up as tangible people with clear-cut desires, struggles, and goals. Unfortunately, from there, these things are very rarely, if ever, mentioned again.

Instead, we get decisions that are made just to move the story along and give us new situations to watch. Given the villains' goals, what they do over the course of the story doesn't make sense. They seem to be actively trying to make things harder on themselves.

Not to say that the script is bad. The dialogue is often engaging and the pacing is pretty strong. It's just that it feels so contrived and inorganic that it's hard to get as wrapped up in it as the filmmakers wanted me to.

It's a solid western, and there's a shortage of good modern ones. That's about all I wanted.

Homestead under attack by lawless cowboys when the native americans treated the homesteaders with respect. There is not much to this movie and it never gets going.

The Plot is a Little Thin The sound is ok The Photography is ok The Acting is ok

I wouldn't recommend it 👎

First off, I'm not a western fan. I am a great movie fan,, and some of them happen to be westerns (like Tombstone, McClintock, etc).

I never loved the western genre as a whole though.

This movie takes place in the vast prarie of Montana, where Hattie & Jeb McAllister are trying to build a homestead with their children Will & Bess. Having moved to Montana from St. Louis, Missouri, life is a daily struggle for the McAllister family. Hattie wants the family to move back home, but Jeb is deadset on making their lives work there.

One day, while Jeb traveled to the nearest town for supplies, a group of 4 men ride up on the McAllister homestead, asking for some water from their well. Trying to be hospitable, Hattie offers to feed the men before they set back out on their horses,, but something about these men doesn't seem quite right. Then, while gathering some eggs from their chicken coop, Hattie discovers an alarming sight (a trophy of sorts) hanging off the side of the leaders horse.

Will Hattie be able to protect her children from these men (who obviously want mote than just water and food)?

As I said before,, I am not a western guy. I am a big fan of what the daily wire has done, and is trying to do (really liked Shut In, and loved What is a Woman), so I will happily watch whatever they come out with. This movie is not great by any means,, but it's in no way bad either. Gina Carano (luv her!!!) has come a long way since her mma days, and while I don't see her winning an academy award (who'd want to be associated with them nowadays?) as an actress, she did really great in this. The Captain actor is good as well. The supporting cast is more than adequate. Now,, the pace of the movie, the direction, and the lack of a soundtrack up until the last few minutes really is the primary things I didn't like about this picture. I understand that may be part of the "old western" type of movie that they were going for here,, but for me it just really needed a soundtrack to help build tension, add some relief, etc. IMO, a movie's soundtrack is just as important as what's happening in front of the camera. The music carries so much of the emotion that the audience should be feeling in each scene (of course, that's just my opinion). Overall,, I can't give it more than an even 7 rating. Perfectly worth watching, but not perfect.

Whilst staying true to genre, it's really not your typical Western. What the film lacks in special effects, it makes up for in slowly unwinding dread and suspense.

It's reminiscent to me of "True Grit" which is the last good Western I saw, there's less about winning in here and more about staying in the game.

Carano's character is incredible. She just about manages to keep on top of vulnerability and impossible odds by remaining intelligent, adaptable and daring. She's the most genuine "strong female" character I've seen in years.

Searcy makes a great job of being a holier than thou but nevertheless bitter and evil villain. I'd have almost understood his anger if I didn't dislike him so much.

My perception of what I was watching changed three times throughout. There's no real twists in the story, but things change as more information comes to light. There's a lot of story development in the film, though things stay very focussed so there's no getting lost.

A criticism from me is that characters lacked urgency in places. Some scenes looked calm, bordering on happy whilst devastation is one bad move away. I think it may have been portraying confident stupidity on one side and staying intelligent in the face of danger on the other, though this aspect translated less than others.

On the whole, I think "Terror on the Prairie" is a better and more honest attempt of filmmaking than most of what I've recently seen. I'll be watching it again once my moonshine's ready.

Like a lot of reviewers on here, I'm a huge fan of the Daily Wire, especially Sweet Daddy Walsh. I did enjoy this film, mainly because I don't watch a lot of movies now as I can't stand the woke agenda in them all. But I do have to wonder why the DW has women as the lead in all their films. If I wanted kick-ass women, I'd watch Hollywood dross. How about a movie that for once had a hero in?

However, that aside, this was surprisingly violent and hard to watch at times. The Captain literally stole the show, and yes he was a bit of a cliché, chewing the scenery whilst spouting Bible verses, but it was effective. The actual scenery was lovely, but the lighting spoilt a lot of what was happening in the cabin. Was the Indian girl having a baby or had she been injured? I honestly couldn't tell.

Please, make more movies DW. I will watch them. How about having a man in the lead next time and give women a much smaller role. Good effort.

IN A NUTSHELL: When Gina Carano was kicked off the set of the Star Wars Mandalorian and blacklisted in Hollywood for Tweeting a political comment that Disney declared was "abhorrent", the crew from The Daily Wire jumped into action and secured a movie script for her within days. A lot of liberal film critics have refused to even watch or review this movie simply because it's co-produced by Gina Carano and distributed by the conservative The Daily Wire.

While I think films should be reviewed on their own merit and not be used as political ammunition, I have to explain that I just didn't understand this movie at all, especially based on what I know about The Daily Wire. Fans of The Daily Wire are generally conservative, so why would The Daily Wire think their audience would enjoy a bloodbath of a film? It's extremely violent, gory, foul-mouthed, and just not good. One of the characters is a vicious murderer who quotes scriptures, as if that isn't an offensive trope against Christians, the very people who truly want to support The Daily Wire. It's as if The Daily Wire doesn't truly understand its audience at all.

The Daily Wire claims that it wants to make non-political movies, yet all but one of them so far have been violent, two of them extremely bloody and gory. I don't get it. This just didn't make sense to me. I wanted to like this movie to back The Daily Wire's support of an actress who was unfairly treated and canceled by Disney for exercising her right of free speech, but I just didn't enjoy this movie at all.

The film was directed by Michael Polish and written by Josiah Nelson. It's about a frontier woman on the Montana plains who must protect herself against a ruthless gang of outlaws bent on revenge.

THINGS I LIKED Those who enjoy hard-hitting Westerns with plenty of shoot-em-up scenes and simple stories guys might like this.

No animals were actually harmed in the making of the movie. Daisy, the cow, is alive and well.

The cinematography is very good.

The homestead looks very realistic.

The young boy played by Rhys Becker did a great acting job and appears to be a natural. He has the talent to do well if he wants a career in the film industry.

The lack of a strong musical score gave the movie a raw feeling.

THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE: There were a LOT of bad acting moments. I was surprised and completely disappointed. So many moments were underacted, while others were overacted. Strange.

So many Western tropes and stereotypes.

The villains just acted like paper-thin caricatures.

How could bad guys in the West miss so many shots?

We see a rattlesnake in the dead of winter. I've heard they're not really active in cold weather.

My husband and I rolled our eyes countless times due to so many dumb decisions by the characters.

I hate shaky cam.

Who knew prostitutes in the 1800s had fake breast implants?

TIPS FOR PARENTS: This is NOT appropriate for kids due to the immense blood, gore, violence, and language.

An attempted rape.

A prostitute tries to get a customer.

THEMES: Grit Family Revenge Sins of the past Family Self-reliance.

Carano and Searcy put up about the worst performances I've ever seen. He used to be a decent actor, perhaps he had a stroke or just forgot how to act. She was in Deadpool and had virtually no lines and still did better in that. Her scenes were painful to watch, and her inability to connect to the audience is why this film has such terrible reviews. I really don't understand why this film was even made, perhaps trying to play off the Yellowstone hype. I'd say this is a B movie, but that would be an insult to B movies that are at least moderately entertaining. I really cannot imagine any of these ten star reviewers actually watching this drivel. Do not waste your time on this flop. And for the love of God, someone tell Carano and Searcy to retire from acting already.