Indaga sui video, le foto e le registrazioni audio più misteriose del mondo e utilizza la migliore tecnologia e gli esperti per emettere un verdetto credibile.Indaga sui video, le foto e le registrazioni audio più misteriose del mondo e utilizza la migliore tecnologia e gli esperti per emettere un verdetto credibile.Indaga sui video, le foto e le registrazioni audio più misteriose del mondo e utilizza la migliore tecnologia e gli esperti per emettere un verdetto credibile.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
10kelani
This show is like a beacon in a world of paranormal genre shows that cater to sensationalism, fabrication, fake experts, and reality-esque dramatization.
Tony Harris works well in this as a narrator, although his claim of being a journalist is a bit suspect. He calls it like the experts see it, and isn't afraid to get a little snarky when hoaxes are involved. That's perhaps my favorite part, because the only thing worse than the current paranormal genre is all the people muddying the waters by creating hoaxes for YouTube hits.
In another refreshing change, the experts are actual experts in their fields, not amateur or armchair types blabbing opinions or pseudoscience. They have credentials, credibility, and really know what the hell they're talking about.
I don't understand why some people are so upset when the verdict is "unexplained phenomenon", because frankly, that's exactly what they are. Further investigation might change that, but for the purposes of the show, that's really the only place they can leave it. It's also silly to expect this show to go beyond its scope and further investigate these cases. That's not what this show is about. The experts are simply giving their time for the show, and probably have no time or desire to leave their day jobs hunting for answers to this stuff.
All in all, it's a great show. I really love seeing video clips that have been labeled "100% authentic OMG paranormal" on other shows being debunked by science, logic, technology actually used properly, and common sense.
Tony Harris works well in this as a narrator, although his claim of being a journalist is a bit suspect. He calls it like the experts see it, and isn't afraid to get a little snarky when hoaxes are involved. That's perhaps my favorite part, because the only thing worse than the current paranormal genre is all the people muddying the waters by creating hoaxes for YouTube hits.
In another refreshing change, the experts are actual experts in their fields, not amateur or armchair types blabbing opinions or pseudoscience. They have credentials, credibility, and really know what the hell they're talking about.
I don't understand why some people are so upset when the verdict is "unexplained phenomenon", because frankly, that's exactly what they are. Further investigation might change that, but for the purposes of the show, that's really the only place they can leave it. It's also silly to expect this show to go beyond its scope and further investigate these cases. That's not what this show is about. The experts are simply giving their time for the show, and probably have no time or desire to leave their day jobs hunting for answers to this stuff.
All in all, it's a great show. I really love seeing video clips that have been labeled "100% authentic OMG paranormal" on other shows being debunked by science, logic, technology actually used properly, and common sense.
I believe Tony Harris is the real deal. He calls them as he and experts see them. No sugar coating, no bs analysis, he's not fake. I gave Him and the show a 9 was because there were some things blatantly obvious and they called it unexplained. Other than dat, Tony Harris is genuine and give the show two thumbs up! Congratulations on the new season. Im glad to see the show made it for another season. If you don't like it, don't watch! Don't be bagging on Tony Harris for doing a job, that's fun and trying to show the public, some of the most bizarre crazy a** sh't, thats out there. That's what its all about! Get it! Some of the weird a** experts still are experts and I trust what they say to be true. Unlike the News, there's at least video, were the news would say a unnamed source, now that's BS!
First off I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. Having said that am I the only person to notice that Mr. Tony Harris is always in & only ever wears gray pants & a black shirt? Lol. I can't be the only one to notice this! Lol. I love Ya Tony Harris but come on, change up the wardrobe now & then. Lol. Although, in my opinion, you do look mighty fine in those black shirts & gray pants. Thanks for listening to my feedback. I'd absolutely love to hear back from somebody cuz I really do LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. So thanks for bringing something new to watch that studies all of these issues & stories that maybe weren't taken seriously or didn't get reported for fear of not being believed. I appreciate your efforts to bring these issues to light when maybe nobody else took them seriously before. I do know absolutely that there are many more stories out there that haven't been reported for fear of not being believed as well as the fear of being ridiculed for what some may consider as unbelievable tall tales. I say thank u to everyone who chose to continue their fights to be recognized & heard. I hear you & I believe you regardless of if you have proof of your encounters or any way of proving yourself or not & I truly believe that there are more people out there who believe you more than not & the people who dont believe you usually they are the people in a position to know if these things are happening or not.
So, I enjoy scientificly geared shows about strange events and phenomena... Ufo, Bigfoot etc. But this has a slight bias towards the truly wacky theories they barely need to present. Many "experts" are pretty good at explaining what's happening as normal, natural etc, but I'm not sure the show is really trying so hard to fully evaluate every video or photo. Maybe it's just me, but any history channel show that talks about ancient aliens before the reasonable archeological or anthropological explanations is filling up time or perpetuating Graham Hancock nonsense. Still a good way to find "urban legend" or famous alleged phenomena.
While watching tonight's episode, I saw the clip of the 3 rows of lights where the right most light on each row would go out, and be replaced by another light at the far left of the remaining lights. After watching the deliberations, the resulting verdict was that the lights are military flares, but I beg to differ with that theory, because if they were military flares, they would drop due to gravity, but none of these lights are dropping.......they are all moving in a straight line. And when a fighter jet releases flares, they don't normally release 1 flare at a time, they launch several! I have no idea what these lights are......but I highly doubt that they are military flares!
I find this show occasionally tries to debunk potential genuine UAPs.
I find this show occasionally tries to debunk potential genuine UAPs.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does The Proof is Out There have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- The Proof is Out There
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Proof Is Out There (2021) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi