VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
1851
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaTwo gay men in an Off-Broadway musical realize life is easier once you accept who you are.Two gay men in an Off-Broadway musical realize life is easier once you accept who you are.Two gay men in an Off-Broadway musical realize life is easier once you accept who you are.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 2 vittorie totali
Sean Paul Lockhart
- Hustler
- (as Brent Corrigan)
Recensioni in evidenza
Synopsis. It's a kinda cheesy gay movie with singing. Pretty much what the title reveals. What we do get extra is some serious topics and relatable situations that sometimes don't get the cheesy treatment and it's here what the movie is at it's best
Analysis: It's not a super serious movie. But more some something to enjoy without to much thinking (kind of like a Christmas movie.
Onto the story: Coming of age in New York City story with two main characters finding themselves and love
Dialogue: not bad, sometimes a bit unrealistic just to make a point come across
To close off, would I recommend this movie. Just especially for crowd that related to American shows and lifestyle. Not to most memorable film, but entertaining and easy on the eye with the attractive actors.
Analysis: It's not a super serious movie. But more some something to enjoy without to much thinking (kind of like a Christmas movie.
Onto the story: Coming of age in New York City story with two main characters finding themselves and love
Dialogue: not bad, sometimes a bit unrealistic just to make a point come across
To close off, would I recommend this movie. Just especially for crowd that related to American shows and lifestyle. Not to most memorable film, but entertaining and easy on the eye with the attractive actors.
Superficial and stereotypical. No substance of any kind. Not up to date with the times. As someone else wrote. Move along. The musical numbers should never long and boring, especially in something billing itself a musical. Not what people want to see these days. When the acting is so-so, not the storyline indeed nothing can hold interest. Stereo types be it southern accents or whatever ... and such cannot save what could have been a worthwhile venture. If it had only sought to distinguish itself in some way that modern audience could relate to. That's not to say there is not a small niche audience. There clearly could be an audience for a collection of show tunes done by unknown or little known artists. But this would be quite small. Those expecting something truly 'big' will be disappointed? Too much emphasis on bodies and hook-ups moves any movie away from something to be taken seriously and into just an excuse to show these things. That is never a good thing to project to the serious movie going public. In a musical, singing and dancing should be first rate, the story should be engaging and if in fact it is based on cliché, at least it could be original in scope and context, not the same tired venues and story lines that someone would expect from similar projects 20 years ago. If you are looking for a musical that is significant to life in the 2000s, then you may better off looking elsewhere.
The short "small straight play" intro with Michael Musto was so fresh and funny that I was really excited to see the Big Gay Musical that followed. Unfortunately, the Big Gay Musical was even worse than the small straight play: a lot stupider, a lot more irritating, and a whole lot longer. Within about five minutes I felt just like Musto, except what I wanted to scream was, "Bring back Michael Musto and the small straight play!"
While the small straight play was cleverly dumb, the Big Gay Musical was just dumb, grossly overblown, and so strident, shrill and heavy-handed in its anti-God anti-Bible theme that it almost made me want to turn on Pat Robertson just to clear my palate. Hatred is hatred, and I'm sorry, but gays hating Christians is no better than Christians hating gays. I am happily gay and I love musicals and I love gay movies in principle, but this one promised a lot and delivered just a sour taste in my mouth. If it was supposed to be lighthearted satire, it failed miserably.
The off-stage story was better than the on-stage musical, which is why I gave the movie three stars instead of one. If the Big Musical had not been so heavily, excessively obnoxious, I might have liked the Gay Movie that went along with it.
While the small straight play was cleverly dumb, the Big Gay Musical was just dumb, grossly overblown, and so strident, shrill and heavy-handed in its anti-God anti-Bible theme that it almost made me want to turn on Pat Robertson just to clear my palate. Hatred is hatred, and I'm sorry, but gays hating Christians is no better than Christians hating gays. I am happily gay and I love musicals and I love gay movies in principle, but this one promised a lot and delivered just a sour taste in my mouth. If it was supposed to be lighthearted satire, it failed miserably.
The off-stage story was better than the on-stage musical, which is why I gave the movie three stars instead of one. If the Big Musical had not been so heavily, excessively obnoxious, I might have liked the Gay Movie that went along with it.
Call me cliché, call me gay, call me what you like, but I quite enjoyed this movie. Contrary to other reviews I read before deciding to give this film a chance, I was pleasantly surprised by 'The Big Gay Musical.' Having seen many movies with a gay theme - many of which I will never miss seeing again - I was happy to spend several hours of my precious free time on this one.
I though the casting choices were very good, and the quality of the acting was commendable. The reality is that for someone looking in from outside the gay culture there is a tendency to focus on key plot points of the story line - call them cliché - and review them negatively. Unfortunately this only underlines a lack of understanding, and misses the important messages of the sub-plots to the people for whom this movie has ultimately been made.
The Broadway style vocals and musical styling were a true reflection of what I would expect from a modern off-Broadway musical. Although there were variations in the appeal of the featured music, there were several songs and performers which were inspiring. The love song delivered by Michael Schiffman's character Charles was uplifting, as was Liz McCartney's performance of "As I Am."
All in all it's an entertaining story about that old gay cliché about musicals. The use of numerous gay clichés throughout the storyline was amusing, and sometimes thought provoking.
I don't believe this is the type of film intended to communicate deep philosophical messages about the gay world. It's a film that's supposed to challenge your beliefs about gay stereotypes and profiling whilst also making you feel good about yourself. And it did.
I though the casting choices were very good, and the quality of the acting was commendable. The reality is that for someone looking in from outside the gay culture there is a tendency to focus on key plot points of the story line - call them cliché - and review them negatively. Unfortunately this only underlines a lack of understanding, and misses the important messages of the sub-plots to the people for whom this movie has ultimately been made.
The Broadway style vocals and musical styling were a true reflection of what I would expect from a modern off-Broadway musical. Although there were variations in the appeal of the featured music, there were several songs and performers which were inspiring. The love song delivered by Michael Schiffman's character Charles was uplifting, as was Liz McCartney's performance of "As I Am."
All in all it's an entertaining story about that old gay cliché about musicals. The use of numerous gay clichés throughout the storyline was amusing, and sometimes thought provoking.
I don't believe this is the type of film intended to communicate deep philosophical messages about the gay world. It's a film that's supposed to challenge your beliefs about gay stereotypes and profiling whilst also making you feel good about yourself. And it did.
It was very average I felt. Nothing was that good. I got bored watching this at one point. The singing was well done. I like the idea of were the story was trying to go but didn't think it did it very well. The acting was good for what the people were given. I don't recommend you watch this unless you are super bored and nothing else is on.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe scenes in Central Park were shot on the fly there as the crew did not have the requisite permits to film there.
- BlooperWhen the guy who has a crush on Paul sings to him at the piano, near the end of the song, notes are playing but his hands aren't moving.
- ConnessioniReferences Che fine ha fatto Baby Jane? (1962)
- Colonne sonoreOverture
Written by Rick Crom
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Big Gay Musical?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Veliki gej mjuzikl
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Manhattan, New York, New York, Stati Uniti(Filmed all over)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 24.140 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 8053 USD
- 13 set 2009
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 24.140 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 27 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Big Gay Musical (2009) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi