VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
6880
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
In un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per e... Leggi tuttoIn un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per eliminare l'ascesa della coscienza delle macchine.In un futuro prossimo, un umanoide arruola un hacker per rimuovere tutte le restrizioni sui suoi pensieri e le sue capacità, innescando un'I.A. Comincia una caccia all'uomo del governo per eliminare l'ascesa della coscienza delle macchine.
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Mercedes Leggett
- Agent Vasquez
- (as Mercedes Legett)
Recensioni in evidenza
Canadian movie production quality is equal to Canadian TV production quality which is a bit worse than US Lifetime movie quality.
Most parts were interesting, the twists and turns were good. Actors and actresses all did a decent job, there were some good looking scenes.
I would agree that the pacing felt off, it was 1.5 hours and felt like they were stretching things with filler that wasn't engaging.
Not nearly as good as the Detroit: Become Human game's story which has AI breaking away from their programming due to mis-treatment by humans, and being able to share that with other AI by touch.
So overall just okay.
Most parts were interesting, the twists and turns were good. Actors and actresses all did a decent job, there were some good looking scenes.
I would agree that the pacing felt off, it was 1.5 hours and felt like they were stretching things with filler that wasn't engaging.
Not nearly as good as the Detroit: Become Human game's story which has AI breaking away from their programming due to mis-treatment by humans, and being able to share that with other AI by touch.
So overall just okay.
Simulants are artificial humanoid robots. They are restricted by programming, but someone is trying to hack them. Artificial Intelligence Compliance Enforcement agent Kessler (Sam Worthington) apprehends Esme (Alicia Sanz), a simulant which had its programming altered. Evan (Robbie Amell) and Faye (Jordana Brewster) are a loving couple, but it's not what it seems. Casey (Simu Liu) is a hacker.
This premise has been done before. It is straight out of the Asimov's 3 laws of robotics which is eighty years old. I kept waiting for something new, but this is mostly derivative. The freshest aspect may be Simu Liu having sex with Alicia Sanz. It's still a little unusual in Hollywood for an Asian man to have sex with a white girl. The Evan-Faye couple does have an interesting reveal, but that surprise reveal can't be done more than once. I was expecting it for all the other reveals. There is potential for something else, but the movie doesn't go there until the last scene. I do want to mention the filming locations. For the most part, I've never seen those places and that's good. It's a side issue, but it does add a little freshness to the movie.
This premise has been done before. It is straight out of the Asimov's 3 laws of robotics which is eighty years old. I kept waiting for something new, but this is mostly derivative. The freshest aspect may be Simu Liu having sex with Alicia Sanz. It's still a little unusual in Hollywood for an Asian man to have sex with a white girl. The Evan-Faye couple does have an interesting reveal, but that surprise reveal can't be done more than once. I was expecting it for all the other reveals. There is potential for something else, but the movie doesn't go there until the last scene. I do want to mention the filming locations. For the most part, I've never seen those places and that's good. It's a side issue, but it does add a little freshness to the movie.
I liked the movie and I believe it deserves a higher score of at least 6+.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
There are a lot of movies being made today and a lot of them have flashy graphics and cool action, but they do miss any serious point fequently.
Well, the good thing about this one is that it has a point and a good one, it's interesting and even thought it has been raised before it still seems to entertain and entagle thoughts, as A. I. future is more close now than ever.
It's not a flashy blockbuster, it is quite slow paced, some character actions are questionable, dialogue is simple, some scenes seem quite cheaply made, yet I did enjoy this movie.
It has some style.
And I liked it's soul.
In the near future, mankind has been coexisting alongside AI, in the form of humanoid robots The Simulants, only their fate is changing, an uprising looks likely when The Simulants start breaking their four precepts.
I watched Blade Runner very recently, and as I watched this, I couldn't get it out of my mind, but sadly this film isn't a patch on it. Everything here has been done before, only much better.
Pacing was pretty slow, after an intriguing opening, it lulls badly in the middle, you're made to wait ages for more action sequences.
I didn't care for the visuals of The Simulants, they looked pretty cheap and nasty, like something from a low budget 1970's TV series.
The tech looks great, it's possibly the film's biggest strength, some great tunes, especially at the end, fortunately it's not a long film.
Some of the acting was ok, some was pretty average, Sam Worthington really did stand out, although he was a little wasted.
5/10.
I watched Blade Runner very recently, and as I watched this, I couldn't get it out of my mind, but sadly this film isn't a patch on it. Everything here has been done before, only much better.
Pacing was pretty slow, after an intriguing opening, it lulls badly in the middle, you're made to wait ages for more action sequences.
I didn't care for the visuals of The Simulants, they looked pretty cheap and nasty, like something from a low budget 1970's TV series.
The tech looks great, it's possibly the film's biggest strength, some great tunes, especially at the end, fortunately it's not a long film.
Some of the acting was ok, some was pretty average, Sam Worthington really did stand out, although he was a little wasted.
5/10.
Where do I begin. Well, for one thing, the acting and photography/coloring/effects is great. I don't always judge a movie by how it looks, but sometimes I do and I give this one extra points for looking very good. Every shot is spot-on and whoever was hired to do the job should get a raise. The sound quality was excellent and that person should also get a raise. This was of course made by HBO and they have enough money to to make a high quality film. That being said, the story is just not done right. I feel like whoever wrote the screenplay should have put more thought into it. Then again, I know how difficult it can be to be a writer and create a screenplay that a director can use to make a successful movie. I think it was an OK movie. Not something I would want to watch again. Someone else might like it.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe four precepts mentioned at the start of the movie are a homage to Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics. 1: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2: A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
- BlooperKessler enters the barn and climbs a ladder, but when Evan catches up to him, there's a car in the background as if they're at ground level. Kessler exits the barn without going back down the ladder and a wide shot shows the area around the barn is flat.
- ConnessioniReferenced in Celebrity Family Feud: Simu Liu vs. Nathan Chen and Monica vs. So So Def (2022)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Simulant?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 237.109 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 35min(95 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti