Uno scienziato brillante ma egoista dà vita a una creatura in un mostruoso esperimento che alla fine porta alla rovina sia del creatore che della sua tragica creazioneUno scienziato brillante ma egoista dà vita a una creatura in un mostruoso esperimento che alla fine porta alla rovina sia del creatore che della sua tragica creazioneUno scienziato brillante ma egoista dà vita a una creatura in un mostruoso esperimento che alla fine porta alla rovina sia del creatore che della sua tragica creazione
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 29 vittorie e 152 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Recensioni in evidenza
The performances are strong across the board. Oscar Isaac offers a convincing, if occasionally a little over-the-top, portrayal of Frankenstein. However, he is ultimately outshined by Jacob Elordi as the Creature. It's a challenging role that could have easily been one-dimensional, but Elordi imbues it with remarkable depth, emotion, and soul - a truly fantastic performance. Christoph Waltz delivers a familiar turn, very much in line with his recent work, while Mia Goth is solid, though it remains to be seen whether she truly lives up to her "next big thing" reputation.
On a technical level, the film excels. The cinematography is stunning, the set design meticulous, and the score beautifully complements the film's emotional tone. The makeup work is exceptional, and while the costumes are impressive, they occasionally verge on being a bit too extravagant.
If there's one major flaw, it's the runtime - the film could easily have been trimmed by at least thirty minutes. Nevertheless, this is a deeply emotional and visually striking experience, and another remarkable addition to Guillermo Del Toro's already distinguished filmography.
Now compared to some other reviewer's my score may seem pretty low, and let me start by saying it's going to be loved by critics and loved by award shows, and deserves the accolades it will receive, but for me personally, I respect it more than I love it.
Del Toro is a incredible director, and that's more than evident in this picture, I enjoyed the story, and his rendition of it, visually it's stunning. But, sorry to say, I'm just not a huge fan of Gothic horror, I never have been. I've tried over the years, and this movie I surprisingly enjoyed more than most, but it's something that's just not always going to be my cup of tea.
There were large portions of the movie I enjoyed, there did come a part in the movie where it headlined the title 'Part 2' which I dreaded, not because I wasn't enjoying it, but I had already felt like I watched a feature movie, yet I was only half way. It was a bit long for me. Which only felt longer because of the pacing.
On the positives, it looks great visually, set pieces are gothic but brilliant, and I loved the cast performances, especially Jacob Elordi as the The Creature. I was not familiar with this actor, but I give credit where it's due, that was a brilliant performance.
Look. If gothic horror is not your thing, still give it a chance, it can be long winded but it's a great rendition of a classic story, I'd be surprised if you hated it even if it's not your favorite genre. If you rated it higher, I'm not going to argue with you, it probably deserves it.
But I digress, Oscar Isaac is brilliant, no surprise there, from Drive to Ex Machina, his villain arc continues to grow like the hump on Igor's back. I look forward to his next role as usual.
I have to admit, having never seen Euphoria, I didn't know how Jacob Elordi would play out but the dude's got range! He really brought the character to life, killed it, then brought it back to life again.
Mia Goth, great mother of Pearl! I found myself falling in line behind all of the other characters in the film that fell in love with her. She never misses.
Christoph Waltz... need I say more?
Guillermo del Toro delivers once again! The visuals and storytelling kept me engaged, even when scenes would slow down, the emotion picked up. And this film is brutal! The creature does not hold back, he was put together to rip others apart.
Go to the theater to see this one while you can! Every shot is masterfully framed and the grandiose set pieces require eyes to be feasted upon the big screen.
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #7 Frankenstein
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
The Best New and Upcoming Horror
Lo sapevi?
- QuizVictor Frankenstein's laboratory and Captain Anderson's ship were fully constructed sets. "I want real sets", director Guillermo del Toro explains. "I don't want digital, I don't want AI, I don't want simulation. I want old-fashioned craftsmanship: people painting, building, hammering, plastering."
- BlooperIn 1857, Victor Frankenstein buys dynamite to blow up the Creature. Alfred Nobel did not invent dynamite until 1866, 9 years after the movie was set.
- Citazioni
The Creature: An idea, a feeling became clear to me. The hunter did not hate the wolf. The wolf did not hate the sheep. But violence felt inevitable between them. Perhaps, I thought, this was the way of the world. It would hunt you and kill you just for being who you are.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe Netflix logo is formed by two batteries running an electric charge in Victor Frankenstein's laboratory.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Horror's Greatest: Film Scores (2025)
- Colonne sonoreRondeau (Abedelazer)
Written by Henry Purcell
Arranged by Jonathan Scott
Performed by Jonathan Scott
courtesy of: Scott Brothers Duo
I più visti
The Year in Posters
The Year in Posters
- How long is Frankenstein?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Dr. Frankenstein
- Luoghi delle riprese
- North Bay, Nipissing, Ontario, Canada(Location / exteriors - Arctic)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 120.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 144.496 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 29min(149 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1






