VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,2/10
1959
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Da decenni negli USA e nel mondo è in corso una guerra contro la droga. L'ex agente della CIA Amaryllis Fox rivela le inquietanti forze economiche che guidano queste attività.Da decenni negli USA e nel mondo è in corso una guerra contro la droga. L'ex agente della CIA Amaryllis Fox rivela le inquietanti forze economiche che guidano queste attività.Da decenni negli USA e nel mondo è in corso una guerra contro la droga. L'ex agente della CIA Amaryllis Fox rivela le inquietanti forze economiche che guidano queste attività.
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
I am a huge fan of Amaryllis Fox which is why I watched. I found every episode to be very informative, entertaining, sad, scary, and interesting. My only issue is that I wanted MORE of every episode!
**To those who keep bashing Amaryllis for looking so different during the show, she was PREGNANT! She was extremely swollen all over which is why she looks like she had face/lip injections. Plus what a stupid thing to comment about anyway!
The best 'drugs' documentary I've ever seen. It was a very successful job. The presenter is good, the stories are good, the topics mentioned are good, the analysis is good ... I felt the quality while watching.
Let's start with the positive!
-Great visuals
-Impressive access
-Interesting experts
-Smooth editing
The negatives; -Miss CIA operative can't help but mention her CIA background every 5 minutes. -Objectivity is out the window. To me that's a faux pas in documentaries!
The negatives; -Miss CIA operative can't help but mention her CIA background every 5 minutes. -Objectivity is out the window. To me that's a faux pas in documentaries!
The Business of Drugs has some good info if you are new to the subject matter and and an engaging host to guide us through it. If you have watched things like this before however it doesn't really break any new ground other than the subtle political drops.
The first "hold on a sec" moment was, calling FARC "far right", when in reality FARC was a Marxist-Leninist rebel group.
From the Wiki, Ideology: Marxism-Leninism, Guevarism, Bolivarianism, Revolutionary socialism, Left-wing nationalism, Foco theory
Political position: Far-left
There is also the insinuation that legalizing cocaine might curb the black market. Obviously that would not be true (production costs, transportation, taxation, etc.) and the black market would still thrive. Also, Legalization would only introduce the product to more consumers as we are seeing with cannabis.
Strangely the legalization theory is undermined later in the documentary when bringing up the thriving black market with legal marijuana. Stranger still is the assertion of how marijuana is being used to keep black men in legal troubles so they can't vote and thus ensuring there will not be another Obama in the White House (sic). I'm not making this up, they said this, in a documentary that is supposed to be giving us facts. There is also mention that the high start up cost of legal marijuana is racist and sexist. Yeah, they said that too.
Add in another slight on conservatives and another remark blaming capitalism for the fentanyl crisis that in their opinion can be solved with more government and more regulations. A quick skim through the credits and I see the name Bloomberg, yep, that one.
It's a shame Netflix has these types of documentaries that seem to be soft political messages hiding inside of compelling subjects and some decent information. I think I just might stick to movies if this is going to be the case
The first "hold on a sec" moment was, calling FARC "far right", when in reality FARC was a Marxist-Leninist rebel group.
From the Wiki, Ideology: Marxism-Leninism, Guevarism, Bolivarianism, Revolutionary socialism, Left-wing nationalism, Foco theory
Political position: Far-left
There is also the insinuation that legalizing cocaine might curb the black market. Obviously that would not be true (production costs, transportation, taxation, etc.) and the black market would still thrive. Also, Legalization would only introduce the product to more consumers as we are seeing with cannabis.
Strangely the legalization theory is undermined later in the documentary when bringing up the thriving black market with legal marijuana. Stranger still is the assertion of how marijuana is being used to keep black men in legal troubles so they can't vote and thus ensuring there will not be another Obama in the White House (sic). I'm not making this up, they said this, in a documentary that is supposed to be giving us facts. There is also mention that the high start up cost of legal marijuana is racist and sexist. Yeah, they said that too.
Add in another slight on conservatives and another remark blaming capitalism for the fentanyl crisis that in their opinion can be solved with more government and more regulations. A quick skim through the credits and I see the name Bloomberg, yep, that one.
It's a shame Netflix has these types of documentaries that seem to be soft political messages hiding inside of compelling subjects and some decent information. I think I just might stick to movies if this is going to be the case
Excellent coverage of the business of drugs globally. A lot of the reviewers have complained that it didn't deal with social issues, health issues, and so forth. But that's not what the intent of this limited series is or was. Well done and nicely articulated by Amaryllis Fox. I, personally, enjoyed learning a few things about her along the way. Interesting woman. Reminds me of some of Lisa Ling's work. (Did anyone else notice her appearance change between when she was traveling and interviewing and then when she was sitting in the studio narrating?)
Lo sapevi?
- ConnessioniReferenced in kuji: Karginov and Konyaev: The Russian Pressure (2020)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does The Business of Drugs have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 45min
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti