Una coppia di cacciatori di tempeste rischia la vita nel tentativo di testare un sistema sperimentale di allerta meteo.Una coppia di cacciatori di tempeste rischia la vita nel tentativo di testare un sistema sperimentale di allerta meteo.Una coppia di cacciatori di tempeste rischia la vita nel tentativo di testare un sistema sperimentale di allerta meteo.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 36 candidature totali
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Twisters' is a mixed bag, drawing comparisons to the original 'Twister'. Praise is given for its visual effects, Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones' performances, and updated technology. However, criticisms include lack of originality, shallow plot, and underdeveloped characters. Action sequences and special effects are well-received, but the film's pacing and lead chemistry receive varied feedback. Despite its flaws, 'Twisters' is considered an entertaining, though not entirely satisfying, experience.
Recensioni in evidenza
So the graphics and visuals are outstanding! It looks like devastation is actually happening. Some of the scenes looking down on the towns were cool but the scenes in the air were incredibly detailed and beautiful. Beyond that I didn't care for it. I wanted to love it but just couldn't . I didn't care or root for any character. I wanted them to all be sucked up into the tornado! There was on scene, early in the movie , that disposed of a character that was awesome. All the performances were hackneyed and just trying to hard. Save your money and wait for it to come on TV or your favorite streaming service.
I want to keep this brief because there really isn't so much to say about this film. The plot is beat to death, with the emotional and plot pivot beats being as predictable as a marvel movie. The film doesn't take itself all that seriously, which is certainly an upside considering how mediocre it is. Every now and then the humor is pretty good and Glen Powell's performance easily is the best out of the two leads. One huge shining mark for the film are the gorgeous wide shot visuals and awesome destruction and effects of the tornados. They did a great job of capturing the beauty of the American midwest.
Beisdes these things, it is an entirely predictable and forgettable film about finishing the job after a haunting tragedy. Despite how average it was, I still enjoyed the film, at least enough for a random Wednesday.
Beisdes these things, it is an entirely predictable and forgettable film about finishing the job after a haunting tragedy. Despite how average it was, I still enjoyed the film, at least enough for a random Wednesday.
Twister is an almost three decades older movie yet it has unquestionably superior cinematography, editing, sound editing, surround sound mixing, score and soundtrack. It also has much more creative and visually memorable tornado sequences.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
Does Twisters have higher resolution CGI? Yes, the CGI is higher resolution but it's not used right and the quality has barely improved since the one decade older tornado movie "Into The Storm".
There is zero mention of climate change and the human causes of more extreme weather.
There's a rodeo sequence (really?) that could have easily been replaced with some other activity like monster truck show or whatever.
They could have made the tornadoes more dark, ominous and violent like in Twister. It also lacks thrilling shots of crazy debris almost hitting the characters.
The could have made it suspenseful and less predictable by adding and killing off some well developed and likable characters.
High frame rate 3D would have been the appropriate choice for an action movie like this, but they cheaped out..
The budget of Twisters is double the budget of Twister. Unbelievable.
You can clearly tell that it was directed by someone who has no talent or experience with directing action.
Twisters is not a sequel to Twister. It's a pointless re-imagining of Twister.
There would have been a chance for some cinematic magic again if they hired the right people to make a sequel to Twister: Director: James Cameron or Jan De Bont Writers: David Koepp and Anne-Marie Martin.
Twisters is certainly well made with a talented core cast. It is far from a bad film, but I found the story to be familiar and predictable as far as disaster films go.
I was happy to settle into something fun and entertaining; I don't think my expectations were too high, but I think Twisters was missing tension, which is a vital part of a film like this. At no point did I feel any of the central cast of characters were under real threat as they bounced between set piece stunts.
Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones are very watchable in the leads and Anthony Ramos does well to give dimensions to a difficult role. There are however, simply too many peripheral characters.
A large portion of the film's runtime focusses on the relationship between the two leads and, aside from Anthony Ramos, there is no time left to flesh out the rest of the supporting cast, who operate largely as comic relief.
I was happy to settle into something fun and entertaining; I don't think my expectations were too high, but I think Twisters was missing tension, which is a vital part of a film like this. At no point did I feel any of the central cast of characters were under real threat as they bounced between set piece stunts.
Glen Powell and Daisy Edgar-Jones are very watchable in the leads and Anthony Ramos does well to give dimensions to a difficult role. There are however, simply too many peripheral characters.
A large portion of the film's runtime focusses on the relationship between the two leads and, aside from Anthony Ramos, there is no time left to flesh out the rest of the supporting cast, who operate largely as comic relief.
Have you noticed an epidemic of movies that don't take themselves seriously? They often involve knowing looks/winks at the camera and meta-jokes that break the fourth wall. (And maybe a Ryan Reynolds appearance.) Twisters is not that. In fact, it is the opposite of that. Twisters is a throwback to when summer blockbusters just went for it, and it is ridiculous in all the best ways. This movie builds on what made the original Twister fun, dials all of it up to 11, and makes absolutely zero apologies for it. Not coincidentally, I had an absolute blast. Everybody who walked into that theater knew what they were signing up for, and we all got it. Not only that, but these characters were way more well rounded than the original, so I understood their choices and cared more when the winds started swirling. It isn't perfect, and it certainly strains credulity throughout, but it was a thrill ride that treated its setting, characters, and audience like they deserved some respect. What's not to like about that?
PS - Powell and Edgar-Jones were absolutely tailor-made for this one.
PS - Powell and Edgar-Jones were absolutely tailor-made for this one.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJames Paxton: The son of Bill Paxton, appears during the rodeo scene as the angry hotel guest.
- BlooperJavi stops his truck when he realizes he's about to drive through the tornado. The tornado then rolls the truck off its wheels to the left. This wouldn't be possible unless the tornado is either behind him or anticyclonic (rotating clockwise), but the tornado is clearly in front of him and rotating counterclockwise. The truck should have tipped to the right, especially since a sign flies to the right just before the truck tips over.
- Curiosità sui creditiThe Warner Bros and Amblin Entertainment logos have stormclouds in the background.
- Colonne sonoreSalio el sol
Written by Paul Irizarry, William Rivera, and Armando Rosario
Performed by Don Omar
Courtesy of Machete Music / VI Music
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 155.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 267.762.265 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 81.251.415 USD
- 21 lug 2024
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 372.262.265 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 2min(122 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti