VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,8/10
5044
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Gli eventi che hanno portato al massacro degli adulti di una piccola città del Nebraska da parte dei loro figli, compreso, dopo che l'irresponsabilità degli adulti ha rovinato il raccolto e ... Leggi tuttoGli eventi che hanno portato al massacro degli adulti di una piccola città del Nebraska da parte dei loro figli, compreso, dopo che l'irresponsabilità degli adulti ha rovinato il raccolto e il futuro dei bambini.Gli eventi che hanno portato al massacro degli adulti di una piccola città del Nebraska da parte dei loro figli, compreso, dopo che l'irresponsabilità degli adulti ha rovinato il raccolto e il futuro dei bambini.
Alyla Browne
- Angie
- (as a different name)
Recensioni in evidenza
I'm going to start off by saying that I did not like this film. But then, I didn't like the original film either. Some reviewers seem to compare this film unfavourably to the original effort, but honestly, that wasn't any better.
The good: The acting is, for the most part, pretty good. Kate Moyer, in particular did a brilliant job. Her character, eden, is smug, arrogant, and contemptible, but all of that is down to her ability to portray such a character, and she does it brilliantly. The acting from the remaining cast is fine, though many of the actors essentially played emotionless zombies, so it's hard to rate.
The bad: There are a number of scenes that really push the boundaries in terms of the audience suspending their disbelief. There are a lot of blatantly obviously bad decisions characters make that it's hard to let go. And, the final scene is appalling; a cringe-inducingly feeble attempt at a final scare that doesn't even qualify as a twist.
What others have said: I've already mentioned that this has been unfavourably compared to the first film. I really don't think that was any better, though nostalgia has maybe altered some people's views.
I've also seen a lot of reviews lambasting the CGI. It certainly won't win any awards but it's nowhere near as bad as some of these reviews would have you believe. The same is true of the plot, which many reviews seem to regard as non-existent. There is a definite story told here, albeit imperfectly.
The main reason I disliked this film was the absolute ineptitude of the protagonists. There were so many opportunities to disrupt what was going on. I know the film wouldn't have worked if these things had been easily stopped, but it seemed like lazy writing to not out real, insurmountable barriers in the way.
Overall, not a bad film, but not one I would recommend either. If you're curious though, give it a shot and don't be dissuaded by the overly-negative reviews.
The good: The acting is, for the most part, pretty good. Kate Moyer, in particular did a brilliant job. Her character, eden, is smug, arrogant, and contemptible, but all of that is down to her ability to portray such a character, and she does it brilliantly. The acting from the remaining cast is fine, though many of the actors essentially played emotionless zombies, so it's hard to rate.
The bad: There are a number of scenes that really push the boundaries in terms of the audience suspending their disbelief. There are a lot of blatantly obviously bad decisions characters make that it's hard to let go. And, the final scene is appalling; a cringe-inducingly feeble attempt at a final scare that doesn't even qualify as a twist.
What others have said: I've already mentioned that this has been unfavourably compared to the first film. I really don't think that was any better, though nostalgia has maybe altered some people's views.
I've also seen a lot of reviews lambasting the CGI. It certainly won't win any awards but it's nowhere near as bad as some of these reviews would have you believe. The same is true of the plot, which many reviews seem to regard as non-existent. There is a definite story told here, albeit imperfectly.
The main reason I disliked this film was the absolute ineptitude of the protagonists. There were so many opportunities to disrupt what was going on. I know the film wouldn't have worked if these things had been easily stopped, but it seemed like lazy writing to not out real, insurmountable barriers in the way.
Overall, not a bad film, but not one I would recommend either. If you're curious though, give it a shot and don't be dissuaded by the overly-negative reviews.
The kid actors are better here. The original movie is fondly remembered by fans due to the outstanding performance by John Franklin as Isaac, but a lot of people aren't aware of the fact Franklin was actually an adult when he played the role - he was 24 years old at the time of filming. This time around the role of mini cult leader goes to an actual child in the form of Kate Moyer as Eden and she absolutely nails it!
Check this one out for yourselves. It's got some inventive kills, decent pacing and the leads do a substantial job of keeping you invested all the way through. The ending might be the weakest element of the entire movie but as remakes go, I've seen worse and this one is a lot better than people are giving it credit for.
Check this one out for yourselves. It's got some inventive kills, decent pacing and the leads do a substantial job of keeping you invested all the way through. The ending might be the weakest element of the entire movie but as remakes go, I've seen worse and this one is a lot better than people are giving it credit for.
This was... a weird one. It had the vibe of a movie made for a pre-teen/high school demographic, yet had the language and gore of an adult horror. The script was also very odd, with some very odd acting to go along with it. I think that the two main girls did a good job... but everything felt so stilted and... odd haha it's hard to describe. It almost had the vibe of a weird 90s made for tv movie. Despite this, the movies looked great. The picture quality and shots looked quite nice and the effects/cgi were successful as well (even though the monster was quite tame). The main redeeming quality of this was the story, but this is like... the 9th iteration of it? So I feel like that negates itself. All in all I wouldn't recommend. 3.5 rounding up to a 4.
If anyone ever tells you that this isn't bad, they are either lying through their teeth or they have the worst taste in the world and you need to disregard them entirely! This has to be one of the worst films that I have ever had the displeasure of trying to sit through.
It's acting is bordering on being unwatchable, the story revamps are laughably bad and it just drags on endlessly... getting worse and worse by the second.
It's so bad that it's not even comically bad. It's just not at all worth watching! Stay far away from this horrid piece of crap.
I'd rather watch a bowling ball coming to crash into my Nuts at 200 mph than ever sit through this awful mess again.
It's acting is bordering on being unwatchable, the story revamps are laughably bad and it just drags on endlessly... getting worse and worse by the second.
It's so bad that it's not even comically bad. It's just not at all worth watching! Stay far away from this horrid piece of crap.
I'd rather watch a bowling ball coming to crash into my Nuts at 200 mph than ever sit through this awful mess again.
The acting,camera/cinematography,sets,costume,score/music and sound was all well done. For me, what brought the suspension of disbelief to screetching halts were several little things in the building of the STORY. I personally didn't care for the special effect of the cornman...
I'm of the old school where slow and creepy can be more frightening than abrupt and obvious. The other special effects tho, were well done.
Not even a NOD towards the original story teller, Stephen King.
Most impressed with the acting and camera work.
I didn't HATE this movie. And You can tell a lot of money went into the making of it. I think the screenplay is where it went wrong.
It was just a leeeetle bit less than a "meh" for me.
Not even a NOD towards the original story teller, Stephen King.
Most impressed with the acting and camera work.
I didn't HATE this movie. And You can tell a lot of money went into the making of it. I think the screenplay is where it went wrong.
It was just a leeeetle bit less than a "meh" for me.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilmed during the 2020 lockdowns. Was able to avoid production shutdown due to being financed from an indie production.
- BlooperWhen she uses the cigarette car cigarette lighter to ignite the gas stream to blow up the silo; by the time the lighter popped out, the talking they did, walking to the back of the car, and more talking: the lighter was still glowing hot. it would've been cooled to the point it wouldn't have been able to light the gas.
- ConnessioniFeatures Ai confini della realtà (1959)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Children of the Corn
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Rylstone, New South Wales, Australia(As fictional town, Rylstone, Nebraska, USA)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 10.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 325.583 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 263.128 USD
- 5 mar 2023
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 575.179 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 33 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.39:1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Grano rosso sangue (2020)?
Rispondi