Mickey 17

Written and directed by Bong Joon Ho, "Mickey 17" is a new sci-fi comedy starring Robert Pattinson as Mickey, an expendable. Mickey signs up for a space voyage as an expendable, which means he'll be remade after each death that occurs while doing taxing work. The movie also stars Mark Ruffalo, Toni Collette, and Naomi Ackie. "Mickey 17" was one of my most anticipated movies this year because Bong Joon Ho is an award-winning director who has made unique movies.

Bong Joon Ho seems to get the very best out of his actors, and they want to bring Ho's vision to life. Robert Pattinson was amazing in this dual performance as he gives unique identities to each character. Mark Ruffalo as the petty dictator was very entertaining. After seeing him in this and "Poor Things", I want to see him in more weird roles. The themes around classes, politics, and colonization were entertaining and impactful despite those themes occasionally being beaten into our heads. I enjoyed the unique experience from this movie, and I am glad it was a goofy, satirical movie unlike "Parasite."

Despite amazing performances, there were some flaws in this movie that bothered me. The beginning was very slow in my opinion because we went back in time to see how he got there. During this, we get a voiceover to narrate what was happening. They easily could have started there. With this beginning, I thought the movie had some pacing issues, mostly due to this. Some elements in the movie seemed to be important, such as the side romance plot, but they were never mentioned again. The climax was entertaining and contained the most action; however, the ending included a dream sequence that felt very unnecessary.

Overall, I found this movie to be enjoyable, but it was slightly disappointing compared to expectations. I am glad I got to see this relatively soon after it came out. I recommend checking this movie out on HBO Max.

For being a sci-fi flick it does ok. It doesn't introduce anything groundbreaking but it is something different. Does it hold up to other sci-fi films? I'd say no, but if you're looking for an average film to burn 2 hours with this does the job.

I will say that considering who it was written and directed by, there was a much higher expectation. After watching a film like Parasite, which was very well done, this was rather tame. I think part of it is the narration and the other part was the writing. Acting wise I think everyone did a fine job, there were themes that were put out there that didn't quite hit or didn't really matter as the story unfolds, and while I could sympathize with the characters and the situations, the actions and consequences of them didn't carry much weight.

This didn't seem to be set up for a sequel and probably for the best, but I'd be curious to see if a part 2 would have more to offer. Overall I gave it a 6 and likely wont see it again.

Mickey 17 is a movie that's not bad but not always good.

Robert Pattinson nails an American accent, which to be honest is totally unnecessary given the amount of different nationalities involved!

British features strongly.

But anyway he does well. And he's always great in the role of all Mickey's.

The supporting cast are fine except for in my opinion a terrible character in Mark Ruffalo's Kenneth Mars and yes I know what he was going for. It's just pretty bad.

The story isn't bad, it's decent enough for a sci fi movie. But it doesn't nail any political or social matters like Parasite or Okja, both of which are absolutely brilliant films.

And therefore a straight sci fi actioner could've been better here.

Although admittedly there's some pretty funny moments.

I sound disappointed which is probably the right emotion. I was expecting something really good but this had too much of Okja and Snowpiercer type action and acting to be unique.

I don't want Bong Joon-Ho to become a parody of himself like Wes Anderson. I believe he's capable of much more.

I have absolutely loved all of his past efforts even Barking Dogs Never Bite, which I think is hilarious.

So that's 3 American made movies all very similar in tone. Definitely time for something more.

Anyway it's worth a watch but this is not a classic.

Bong Jongho's next wide-screen project since his historic win at the Oscar's is rather a big let-down.

For such an intriguing premise, we should have been promised a story with colorful development and of gray morality, and yet were presented with such an obviously black-and-white good-triumphing-over-evil Hollywood movie.

The morality of science? The definition of one's self? The Ship of Theseus paradox? Like, such a wasted opportunity to explore the multitude of questions. I guess it's my fault to expect too much.

Robert Pattinson and Toni Collette are amazing, though. Brilliant camera work and visual effects.

Mickey 17 had the potential to be an innovative sci-fi/comedy film, and it starts off in an engaging and original way. However, as the story progresses, it loses focus and ultimately turns into something generic, with an uninspired and rushed conclusion.

Robert Pattinson delivers a solid and well-rounded performance, proving his versatility even in a film that leans more towards comedy - something outside his usual genre. Despite the lighter tone, Pattinson brings depth to his character, making the story feel more grounded and adding an emotional layer to the film that otherwise would feel empty.

Cloning is a fascinating subject for a sci-fi movie because of all the moral and practical dilemmas it presents. Mickey 17 introduces these ideas but doesn't fully engage in them, shifting focus to a less compelling storyline midway through - the Creepers.

It feels out of the place compared to the film's promising start and even the trailers- The initial mix of humor and originality is lost, and by the end, the movie feels like it was hurriedly wrapped up just to deliver something, lacking any real creativity or impact.

That said, the film excels in its production design. The setting and character outfits are well-crafter, adding to the immersive sci-fi atmosphere. Additionally, the visual effects are compelling, bringing the futuristic world to life in a convincing and visually stunning way, which helps maintain engagement even when the story fails to do so.