Iron Man 2

Positives:

• Robert Downey Jr.
• The first act
• Ideas with potential

Negatives:

• Second and third acts
• Inconsistent story and pacing
• Villain(s)

!! Possible Spoilers!!

*Iron Man 2* picks up shortly after the events of its predecessor, finding Tony Stark basking in the glow of his newfound hero status. However, the film quickly reveals a darker underbelly to the billionaire playboy's life. His reliance on the Arc Reactor, the power source for his Iron Suit, is slowly poisoning him, while the demands of the public and the military put immense pressure on Stark Industries.

Mickey Rourke delivers a menacing performance as Ivan Vanko, a bitter Russian scientist seeking revenge against Stark for his father's downfall. Vanko's creation, the Whiplash suit, proves to be a formidable opponent for Iron Man. The film also introduces Samuel L. Jackson's Nick Fury in a more prominent role, laying the groundwork for the Avengers initiative.

While Downey Jr. Continues to shine as the charismatic and witty Tony Stark, the film struggles to maintain the same level of originality and excitement as its predecessor. The plot becomes increasingly convoluted as it juggles multiple storylines, including Stark's personal struggles, the threat of Vanko, and the introduction of new characters like Black Widow (Scarlett Johansson) and War Machine (Don Cheadle).

The action sequences are undeniably impressive, with the iconic climax featuring multiple Iron Suits battling it out. However, the film's pacing suffers at times, and the overall tone is less focused than the first installment. Additionally, the resolution of the palladium poisoning plot point feels somewhat rushed and anticlimactic.

Key plot points:-

* Tony Stark's dependency on the Arc Reactor * The introduction of Ivan Vanko and the Whiplash * The development of the War Machine armor * Black Widow's first appearance in the MCU * The increasing involvement of Nick Fury and S. H. I. E. L. D.

Despite its flaws, *Iron Man 2* is still an entertaining superhero film with plenty of eye-catching moments. It successfully expands the Marvel Cinematic Universe and sets the stage for future installments. However, it ultimately falls short of reaching the heights of its predecessor.

Jon Favreau knew exactly what he was doing with this movie. This is a sleek, no-holds barred superhero movie, with great performances from Robert Downey Jr. and Mickey Rourke. Let's face it, it was almost impossible to top the first one; nevertheless this a good sequel to one of the best superhero movies ever made.

Scarlett Johansson fulfilled her role as the the sexy and cunning agent Natasha Romanoff, and Gwyneth Paltrow is fine as Pepper Potts. Sam Rockwell plays Tony Stark's competitor, and does a pretty good job at it.

The only problem I have with this movie is that too many things have been fitted into 124 minutes. I understand that the movie was meant to be a roller-coaster ride, intended to thrill, but a little more character development would certainly have helped the movie. For example Samuel L. Jackson ans Johansson's characters are underused. Also, the ending was a little disoriented and predictable; something just didn't feel right about it.

All in all, Jon Favreau has made a movie that would please the fanboys and satisfy the critics. This is a movie that entertains, while still complementing the first movie, and setting up a third movie. If you liked the first movie, just go ahead and watch this movie - you won't see a masterpiece, but you'll have a fun day at the movies.

P.S.- Watch out for the after credits scene

The makers of this film held nothing back. When it works, as it does here, it rekindles even a cynic's movie love. So kudos to Downey, Paltrow, Cheadle, Scar-Jo, Rockwell, Rourke and especially Favreau. What a film! It is a sight to behold. Every scene was captivating, whether it was full on armor action or the charismatic "down time" delivered by the best cast possible. Isn't that what movies are suppose to be about? It's good to see the response to the movie has been, for the most part, positive. I've noticed that sometimes expectations are unreasonable or some fans are too attached to their comic book preconceived notions. (X-Men and Wolverine fans I'm looking right at you!) Iron Man 2 stayed close enough to its roots and I hope most judge it as a film first. If you do, I'm almost certain that everyone will enjoy it as much as I did.

It easily fulfilled and then exceeded all of my expectations. The only thing I worry about is that they may be setting expectations for that Avengers movie too high. How can it possibly live up to the standard these movies are setting and setting up????? Iron Man 2 is EVERYTHING you would want in a movie and much more! It is a special treat when a sequel reaches up and delivers an excellent film that you thoroughly enjoy as much if not more than a beloved first installment. It truly feels like they just paused and kept telling the same story but with more of an edge. Hopefully, they can do it again and skip that third movie curse. Think of it as another installment and they'll be fine. Fitting Avengers in to the mix is even more fun to think about but I heard that Favreau will be involved with that as an executive producer. So, I'm not worried. In the meanwhile, we can all enjoy this film because it stands on its own but as a great part of a running saga.

At its high points - the first act and the climax - Iron Man 2 is actually better than the first film. Everything up to and including the action scene in Monaco is just great fun to watch: the action, the character interactions, and of course Robert Downey Jr's wonderful portrayal of Tony Stark. And the action scene at the end is pretty epic.

The problem is, the film just stops being so much fun in-between. In a large proportion of this time, it's either going too slowly with little happening that's exciting or even particularly interesting, or it's providing some silly moments like Iron Man lounging on a giant display donut. To be fair, there's no problem with the many subplots this movie has: they all blend together quite smoothly.

The acting in this film deserves credit: almost everybody does a great job. Robert Downey Jr and Gwyneth Paltrow are just as entertaining as they were in the first film, Jon Favreau gets more to do as Stark's chauffeur, Don Cheadle is actually a little better than Terrence Howard as Rhodie (again, maybe because he has a bigger role), Mickey Rourke portrays a decent but overall ordinary villain, and once Scarlett Johansson is allowed to do something substantial with her own action sequence, she's well worth watching. The only weak link is Sam Rockwell as Justin Hammer, who gets quite annoying after a while.

Overall, Iron Man 2's slow middle section prevents it from being better than the first film as a whole, which is a shame considering how brilliant the beginning and end segments are.