Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA law enforcement officer is forced to go rogue when an unthinkably cruel and dangerous maniac murders innocent victims in gruesome ways.A law enforcement officer is forced to go rogue when an unthinkably cruel and dangerous maniac murders innocent victims in gruesome ways.A law enforcement officer is forced to go rogue when an unthinkably cruel and dangerous maniac murders innocent victims in gruesome ways.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
Right, so this LOW - go lower than that - budget slasher with a Most Dangerous Game twist does the most it can with what it's got, you gotta give it that much. Lack of funds result in some seriously risible Halloween Store moments, especially in the design of unstoppable, possibly non-human killer Havoc, but those can be overlooked if there's enough cheap thrills to go around. Having a plucky reporter interview the eccentric billionaire who created the murder park (really a clump of bare trees) that Havoc runs amuck in was a wily way to get the backstory told without having to pay for much, too. Said reporter is essayed by Emily Sweet, and she's iffy at best in this, kind of a completely charmless Samara Weaving. Anyway, she eventually teams up with a rogue cop that's wandering around shooting everybody. Robert Bronzi (with a dub job) is the cop and if you've never seen the dude before, the reports are true - he's an astonishing deadringer for late 60's era Charles Bronson. I mean, it's wild. So the vigilante and the Final Girl take on the kooky billionaire and the undead killer and it basically goes how you think it might. It would've been nice to have a more Bronzi-centric story, as he is by far the most intriguing aspect of this whole operation, but I'll take what Bronzi I can get.
The script is loosy goosey and again, it's really cheap. But Bronzi is so weirdly compelling that it's worth it just to gaze upon him. As far as exploitation type kicks go, I can at least report that every female actor in the film under 50 shows their boobs and there are a few solid gore gags (top of head ripped off, jaw removal, manual drill through the throat, etc). Not a great film by any stretch, but if you squint just a little, it's got some good stuff.
Director Rene Perez - who churns this stuff out at an alarming pace - really did put every penny on the screen. It was only like 17 pennies, but still.
The script is loosy goosey and again, it's really cheap. But Bronzi is so weirdly compelling that it's worth it just to gaze upon him. As far as exploitation type kicks go, I can at least report that every female actor in the film under 50 shows their boobs and there are a few solid gore gags (top of head ripped off, jaw removal, manual drill through the throat, etc). Not a great film by any stretch, but if you squint just a little, it's got some good stuff.
Director Rene Perez - who churns this stuff out at an alarming pace - really did put every penny on the screen. It was only like 17 pennies, but still.
Why these kind of movies are made and howcome they sell so good is a real mystery to me. its for the blood and gore galore lovers and as to the content , with all its psychopathy and sosiopathy supplied by a mere manic hooded something, that has crashed through a metal fence, not able to remove the barbs and spikes as theyve melted into the beasts face. there are loads of attractive females with bare breast and allsorts, but the beast appears like a twelve year old boy and shadows away from the beautifullness, and instead wrench,stabs and chops the living daylights from them poor things. its not entertainment thinks the grumpy old man, cannibal holocoust from the 70's appears like a oscar candidate compared to this 2020 junk.
productionwise its just bad, lightsetting and soundwork are terrible, acting and story are relentlessly missing and wheres the plotmotion when everyone gets killed anyway from start to end.
i shall not elaborate on junk like this, just say that robert bronzi appears in this film, and he is the fantastic spitting image of charles bronson, and my only wish must be that some serious filmgiant gives this man a chance in a well written and directed blockbuster sometimes in the future, because he can actually jogg and shoot and hit .
its a no recommend to all the sane and sound among us
productionwise its just bad, lightsetting and soundwork are terrible, acting and story are relentlessly missing and wheres the plotmotion when everyone gets killed anyway from start to end.
i shall not elaborate on junk like this, just say that robert bronzi appears in this film, and he is the fantastic spitting image of charles bronson, and my only wish must be that some serious filmgiant gives this man a chance in a well written and directed blockbuster sometimes in the future, because he can actually jogg and shoot and hit .
its a no recommend to all the sane and sound among us
The movie might not have a good story, but on the other hand it has endless running around in the woods, a ridiculously edgy villain, and a really de-saturated look that gets old quick.
There is a lot that's actually good here so let's do that.
The good:
The Gore: It's good and there's a lot of it.
The Plot: What you do get isn't bad.
The Acting: Minus dubbed Bronzi it's fine
The Bad:
The Plot: Remember how I said what is there is good?
Well there is so little of it that it becomes a massive negative.
It starts with a random kill and the random kills happen at random and do not stop throughout the movie.
You don't get any plot until you finally follow the reporter and then she's immediately thrown away for dubbed porn action scenes.
The Action: So the gore is impressive, but the action is so unserious (especially in comparison to everything else) that it just looks and feels wrong all of the time.
Ultimately the gore is good. But if the plot of your movie is just more meat for your grinder your movie is bad.
There are no characters. Just annoyance that the one the plot centers around isn't one.
The good:
The Gore: It's good and there's a lot of it.
The Plot: What you do get isn't bad.
The Acting: Minus dubbed Bronzi it's fine
The Bad:
The Plot: Remember how I said what is there is good?
Well there is so little of it that it becomes a massive negative.
It starts with a random kill and the random kills happen at random and do not stop throughout the movie.
You don't get any plot until you finally follow the reporter and then she's immediately thrown away for dubbed porn action scenes.
The Action: So the gore is impressive, but the action is so unserious (especially in comparison to everything else) that it just looks and feels wrong all of the time.
Ultimately the gore is good. But if the plot of your movie is just more meat for your grinder your movie is bad.
There are no characters. Just annoyance that the one the plot centers around isn't one.
Worst movie I have ever seen. Writing is dreadful. How can people be that stupid??? 6 people firing machine guns at 1 guy and they miss? So funny. The girl reporter was dumb as dogs%#*
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperThere's no explanation for why Rachel's blouse is open and her breasts exposed. Likewise, Stina.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Cry Havoc?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Игра в куклы: Псы войны
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 4.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 25 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Cry Havoc (2020) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi