Dopo la tragica overdose del suo ex amico, Will, un tossicodipendente in via di guarigione, torna a casa, dove si riunisce con Claire, la madre in lutto del suo amico, con la quale inizia un... Leggi tuttoDopo la tragica overdose del suo ex amico, Will, un tossicodipendente in via di guarigione, torna a casa, dove si riunisce con Claire, la madre in lutto del suo amico, con la quale inizia una relazione segreta ma volatile.Dopo la tragica overdose del suo ex amico, Will, un tossicodipendente in via di guarigione, torna a casa, dove si riunisce con Claire, la madre in lutto del suo amico, con la quale inizia una relazione segreta ma volatile.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Jess Elgene
- Woman at Wake
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Christian Gwinn
- Man at Wake
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Russell Lawrence Smith
- Recovering Addict
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Donna Swan
- Extra
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
The intentions and ambitions of this movie are both fine and relevant, but it didn't quite have the script and the cast to achieve them. Charlie Heaton playing the main character Will was the only one appearing as a professional actor, while the remaining cast clearly struggled to look like real actors. Catherine Keener as Claire by far has the weakest performance, mumbling all her lines with the same dull look in each and every scene, no matter what is going on. The chemistry between her and Heaton is zero. Why is the young Will suddenly attracted to this old worn-out mamma - even drunk - with absolutely no lead-up or any clues as to what drives him physically or emotionally. Having a nice and caring girlfriend making much more sense as his partner in every which way. This major plot hole is never explained. Trying as it may, the movie never succeeds in triggering any particular emotions. It is supposed to be depressing; it just doesn't have the believable script and cast to carry it through. The Metascore of 65 is grossly misleading; it is rather a 48-movie. Probably it is due to the theme of addiction that it got that score; not because of the artistic qualities that it doesn't have.
Wow, that was one depressing movie. That said, it was also an excellent film overall. I thought the writing was excellent. There wasn't a heck of a lot of dialogue. But the dialogue was pretty intense.
The film was slow moving, and plodding, to great effect. It had a gentle pace about it as it makes its way to the end that comes as no surprise. I won't reveal what it is, but you kind of know what's coming.
And the acting was excellent. Everyone in this remarkable movie did a great job. For some reason, this one slipped under the radar what's with people? I thought this film deserved wider recognition, for sure.
--MovieJunkieMark.
The film was slow moving, and plodding, to great effect. It had a gentle pace about it as it makes its way to the end that comes as no surprise. I won't reveal what it is, but you kind of know what's coming.
And the acting was excellent. Everyone in this remarkable movie did a great job. For some reason, this one slipped under the radar what's with people? I thought this film deserved wider recognition, for sure.
--MovieJunkieMark.
It's beautiful, real, sad and depressing. Screenplay is so simple yet so emotional and heartwarming. It tackles some serious issues as well. Performances are superb by everyone. It's very good but not everyone's cup of tea.
I saw this at the Tribeca film festival, and thought it was very good. Heart-wrenching with solid acting. Well done!
Absolutely phenomenal performances from everyone, especially from Charlie and Catherine. Give those two Oscars already lol! Overall a very depressing movie, but in a good way that really makes you think differently afterwards, and to me that's one of the best things a movie can do. Some critics complained that the movie is diminished by its "overly simplistic script", but I got the impression that the dialogue was kept simple on purpose in order to let the actors tell the story instead, by letting their body movements, facial expressions, and vocal tones take focus over the words.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe film was originally set to premiere at the 2020 Tribeca Film Festival; however, the festival was canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The film premiered a year later at the 2021 Tribeca Film Festival.
- Colonne sonoreTime After Time
Performed by Stephen Smith
Written by Stephen Smith
Courtesy of Stephen Smith
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is No Future?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 29min(89 min)
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti