Laura Hasn't Slept

Watched Smile some time ago, but was curious to check out the short it was based on. Quite honestly, I kinda liked this more than the feature.

The production design was really immersive and it had a really good use of sound to build tension. The actress was quite good as well and I was glad they put her in the feature too. It felt a bit longer than it was, probably due to being drawn in so quickly.

I can totally see why Paramount scooped up this short, as it was pretty original. I wish the feature was more about the roots of this short, rather than running off to do its own thing. One of the best short films I've seen.

I have not seen smile yet but I do intend to. I watched this film instead as it's the inspiration for Smile. This was one of the best short films I have seen. The tension and atmosphere were perfect, it managed to give an real air of menace. The two actors were very good and really managed to convey the fear and sense that something if a little off. I hope that Smile is as good as this. Movies like The Broken and the original The Ring, The Grudge and Dark Water all manage to convey that things are not quite right feeling. Laura Hasn't Slept managed to do that beautifully.. I fully recommend this short film.

The short film that gave rise to one of the best horror movies of 2022 served as a pretty promising pilot with a pretty good concept. Its short length is quite satisfying and offers a story that starts out as simple therapy, but halfway through everything turns upside down. The nightmare that this short film presents to us is very well set with excellent production. It is a very professional short film with great quality. It is engaging and generates quite a bit of tension. Laura Hasn't Sleep is one of the best horror short films ever made and they made a wise decision in wanting to adapt it into a feature film. It really deserved to be expanded through a movie. My final rating for this short film is a 9/10.

The idea of being trapped in a nightmare is a trope of the horror genre, explored in Parker Finn's short film "Laura Hasn't Slept", a short film that revolves around this question and that laid the groundwork for its passage to feature film in the successful Smile.

The short film starts in media res with the protagonist, Laura. (Caitlin Stasey) in the office of her therapist, the calm and kindly Dr. Parsons (Lew Temple). Laura is clearly not in a good state of mind, to the point that she has refused to sleep for several days, due to a recurring nightmare she has about a creepy smiling man who threatens to show her "his true face." The tension of the short is very well executed, slowly building as we learn more about Laura, her nightmares and the monster that haunts them.

This premise is by no means new, it combines the concept of avoiding sleep to avoid confronting a terrifying entity, with the theme of the stigmatization of mental illness in the horror genre. Titles like Them from 2002 come to mind, and above all, any film in the Freddie Krueger saga. With these precedents, the viewer instinctively knows what is to come and it seems inevitable, but the director shows a great ability to smoothly transition from one atmospheric level to the next. With that use of slow panoramas as an element of suspense, which the director has turned into a trademark of the house.

The idea of using the smile as the main concept in a horror film is not new, perhaps its oldest literary antecedent is the short story by H. G. Wells, "Pollock And The Porroh Man", in which terrible visions of a smiling head haunts an English expeditionary in the Sierra Leone of colonial imperialism in the 19th century. An overexploited concept, that year after year, there are constant revisions and variations, especially in the short film genre.

In short, Laura Hasn't Slept tells a brief but terrifying story, where she plays with the dichotomy of madness and demonstrates a good know-how to create tension and propose sequences with a captivating atmosphere.

*A more detailed review can be found on the youtube channel Kristonkino.

The main character in "Smile" (2022) was female. There was reason to expect a male one in "Smile 2" (2024), but that expectation wasn't met.

This isn't a horror film series with an iconic heroine like "Alien" where Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley would remain the main character for more than one film, and not without reason. Talking about two horror films with only six days between them, chronologically, and the main character in either is female. One actress in the first one, another in the other, and that isn't a problem.

It was clear in both those films the evil thing our heroes would have to deal with was a supernatural entity and could appear as anyone, man or woman, it could take any human form. But in this short horror film that was the origin of both "Smile" and "Smile 2", there are only two characters on screen and the evil supernatural thing to deal with.

Laura, a young woman who is the main character here, makes it clear her nightmares, the ones that she has been having for a few nights now, the ones she can no longer stand, the ones she tries to avoid now by choosing to fight off sleep, are about a man. Not something supernatural appearing in the guise of different, various individuals, it is a man, specifically, a man, even though his face is different every time, it is a bad man this young woman is supernaturally haunted by.

Man bad woman good, clear on that. What's also clear is the creator wants more than a horror film, he wants there to also be something like humor. Whether or not it is misplaced is open to discussion. What's also clear is the open ending. Or, rather, a lacking ending, and that isn't good either, because if one accepts "Smile" and "Smile 2" as a direct continuation of "Laura Hasn't Slept", then there is a problem.

In both of them the entity could show up any time in any human form and didn't require the victim to sleep, even though it did resort to nightmares. But here, it's like the entity only shows up in the nightmares. And the whole "chain" idea, this thing going from one person to another, none of it is in "Laura Hasn't Slept". And the whole short film is basically one sequence, and you can't really tell where the definitive line is between the reality and the nightmare.

The visuals and the sounds work fine, and the acting is also a plus, it's the content, the substance beneath the package that could and should have used more care, should have been paid more attention to, but they clearly were banking on the package to fool the audience into thinking there was something highly sophisticated underneath.

Not that anything much should be expected from a short film anyway, but all "Laura Hasn't Slept" accomplishes is give the audience a scare or two. And again, it is impressive technically and when it comes to the performances, but it has no point to make, it's bright, loud, and pointless.