Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislatio... Leggi tuttoWhen MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislation against bias in algorithms that impact us all.When MIT Media Lab researcher Joy Buolamwini discovers that facial recognition does not see dark-skinned faces accurately, she embarks on a journey to push for the first-ever U.S. legislation against bias in algorithms that impact us all.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 3 vittorie e 6 candidature totali
- Self - Author, Weapons of Math Destruction
- (as Cathy O'Neil Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Twitter and Tear Gas
- (as Zeynep Tufekci Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Automating Inequality
- (as Virginia Eubanks Ph.D.)
- Self - Technical Co-Lead, Ethical A.I. Team at Google
- (as Timnit Gebru Ph.D.)
- Self - Author, Algorithms of Oppression
- (as Safiya Umoja Noble Ph.D.)
Recensioni in evidenza
There´s little focus but very hyperbolic interpertation of the data when it came to racial profiling by the AI... just a whiff of "wokeness" that was digestible to me, but also caused the polarization on this review section.
The rest of the documentary is well produced, informative, and seriously eye opening and you should see it because any of the negatives at least for me dont even come close to the deeper understandig you get from practical examples you see around the world that are very scary.
.
Fact: The darker ones complexation is the LESS likely that there is usable video or photos for investigators or prosecutors.
The makers of this film claim the opposite is the case, they claim there is a bias against persons with darker complexions -- when in fact that is not at all what the peer reviewed research shows.
Interesting how the information was discovered to begin with... and to me it was a bit shocking that it was not entirely intentional a discovery. But a discovery nonetheless.
I'd love to see this documentary delve into the use for employment platforms and their algorithms too. The documentary showcases how employment platforms may be removing candidates that have gone to certain universities or that participated in certain organizations, etc. (But then say they can't find "qualified" candidates? Yet, look at unemployment stats...)
The bad reviews probably have vested interests and don't want people to know, or maybe are biased themselves? Either way....
Don't let that deter from watching how your information is gathered and used by technology today and in the future to come.
There is currently a big lack in regulation as AIs are being employed, so it's sort of a free for all until there's proper oversight.
Is this the new way of discrimination that people don't even know is happening? Maybe.. but the documentary just touches the surface on what and how tech is and can be used and that there is desperate need for oversight and regulation.
Must watch!! PLEASE educate yourself, you deserve to know this information.
It's minor, but wasn't sure why some interviewees were framed with so much headroom. Then again, Mr Robot did that and I never understood it there, and given that that was also concerned with themes of technology and surveillance, maybe there's some shared symbolism I'm not picking up on.
Some of the segments with the AI saying menacing things were a little cheesy, but overall brief at least.
There's also a sense that the documentary may cover a little too much in its 85-minute runtime. While I can admire its ambition in covering so many aspects of facial recognition software, its racial biases, algorithm discrimination, and so on, it does make for a documentary that jumps around a fair bit and not always smoothly... at least all the topics are interesting on their own.
But in the end, it covers important topics and presents compelling arguments about particular flaws and biases in technology. It does warn that this is something that if unchecked could become a serious problem, so I like the attempt to bring awareness to this issue before it completely spirals out of control.
It's well edited, features interesting interviewees and subjects, and ends on a little more hope than I was anticipating, which was a nice surprise. Overall, it's one of the better Netflix documentaries I've watched in a while.
At the same time, purely as a documentary this is kind of weak. It's sometimes a little muddled, and it sometimes stretches a point a bit too far. Some of the things it tries to fold into the narrative are less examples of technological racism and more examples of actual criminal behavior. There's a difference between slippery tech and actions that resulted in people going to jail.
Still, it's a compelling film.
Lo sapevi?
- Citazioni
Self - Author, Weapons of Math Destruction: On internet advertising as data scientists, we are competing for eyeballs on one hand, but really we're competing for eyeballs of rich people. And then, the poor people, who's competing for their eyeballs? Predatory industries. So payday lenders, or for-profit colleges, or Caesars Palace. Like, really predatory crap.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Jeremy Vine: Episodio #4.95 (2021)
I più visti
- How long is Coded Bias?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Kodlanmış Önyargı
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.236 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 10.236 USD
- 15 nov 2020
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 10.236 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 26 minuti
- Colore