VALUTAZIONE IMDb
2,8/10
9069
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Due giganteschi serpenti sfuggono al controllo dei ricercatori che li hanno allevati in un laboratorio segreto e si dirigono verso i centri abitati. Bisognerà fermare i pericolosi rettili - ... Leggi tuttoDue giganteschi serpenti sfuggono al controllo dei ricercatori che li hanno allevati in un laboratorio segreto e si dirigono verso i centri abitati. Bisognerà fermare i pericolosi rettili - sui quali erano in corso importanti studi scientifici - prima che si riproducano.Due giganteschi serpenti sfuggono al controllo dei ricercatori che li hanno allevati in un laboratorio segreto e si dirigono verso i centri abitati. Bisognerà fermare i pericolosi rettili - sui quali erano in corso importanti studi scientifici - prima che si riproducano.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Alan O'Silva
- Andrei
- (as Alin Olteanu)
Mihaela Elena Oros
- Sofia
- (as Mihaela 'Sasha' Oros)
Alin Florian Constantinescu
- Darryl
- (as Alin Constantinescu)
Banica Gheorghe
- Farmer
- (as Gheorghe Banica)
Bart Sidles
- Guard
- (as Barton Sidles)
Riepilogo
Reviewers say 'Anaconda 3: Offspring' is criticized for its poor CGI, generic plot, and subpar acting, even from recognizable actors like David Hasselhoff and John Rhys-Davies. The film lacks character development and an engaging narrative. However, some find it entertaining for its campy, B-movie charm and over-the-top gore, offering a guilty pleasure for fans of the genre.
Recensioni in evidenza
For the most part I was Horrified! At the movie that is, the cgi was the worst of all 3 movies and the story was just plum stupid. Upon the original release of Anacondas back in 97, the cgi was great. Most of the time you couldn't tell that the snakes where fake. However in this picture every time you see one of the over-sized snakes, all you see is a glowing snake-like figure thats really shiny whom looks nothing like the snakes in the original film. Frankly I would be ashamed to be J.lo, Ice Cube, or Jon Voight! Don't get me wrong I loved the original, thats why I get so mad when someone does a sloppy remake! I really wish that someone could tell me why we are farther in times yet our cgi worsens with every year. Im a big cgi I nut, if stuff looks fake, I don't really care to watch it. Also the snakes in the first two films where proportionate, the weren't so big that you would never believe them to exist. This film is like a remade "Python". The snakes are probably a few hundred feet long! How stupid? If s0ny produced this film, then I have nothing more to say, they should loose their L's to shoot films.
While researching an offspring of anaconda with transgenic for saving lives discovering cure for cancer and Alzheimer in the facility of Wexel Hall Pharmaceutics, the CEO Murdoch (John Rhys-Davies) refuses to invest in a larger tank and more security and staff as advised by the head of the project, Dr. Amanda Hayes (Crystal Allen). When he focuses a light in the tank, the anaconda attacks and breaks out the confined facility. Murdoch hires a team leaded by the mercenary Hammett (David Hasselhoff) to destroy the animal.
What a crap this lame "Anaconda III" is! This collection of clichés is awful, not funny, noisy and ridiculous, with terrible screenplay, acting and CGI. I believe the anaconda likes dyed blonde since the beast attacks everybody but the twenty-nine year old scientist along the story. Do not waste your time like I did is my final advice. My vote is one.
Title (Brazil): "Anaconda 3"
What a crap this lame "Anaconda III" is! This collection of clichés is awful, not funny, noisy and ridiculous, with terrible screenplay, acting and CGI. I believe the anaconda likes dyed blonde since the beast attacks everybody but the twenty-nine year old scientist along the story. Do not waste your time like I did is my final advice. My vote is one.
Title (Brazil): "Anaconda 3"
Harmless fun. A couple of giant, generically altered snakes break out and terrorize people. The snakes are not-great CGI, but they commit a lot of mayhem, probably more graphically than you'd expect. David Hasslehoff (yup, you read that right) leads the group that is chasing them. Best part of the flick, by far, is Crystal Allen, who plays a PhD and a snake expert, and she's my favorite type of snake expert PhD, the type that is a smoking hot blonde and spends almost the entire movie in a tight, form-fitting tank top. Crystal also works hard to sell her character, and she's fun to watch.
Debuted on Sci-Fi channel in advance of the DVD release, you could do a lot worse.
Debuted on Sci-Fi channel in advance of the DVD release, you could do a lot worse.
The first Anaconda was passable, the second was pretty poor but nothing could have prepared me for this! Though the ultra low IMDB rating should have really come to mention it.
I guess was doomed from the start, it has a tiny budget by comparison, it's the third film in an already cheesy scyfy level franchise and the biggest star they could get to carry the movie was the "Hoff".
So yeah, it all looks so very terrible. I could do better sfx than this (And have), the snakes look pitiful and the cast look positively bored throughout.
Though Hasselhoff is better than usual he still can't carry a film and the incredible John Rhys-Davies has a heartbreakingly small role here.
To make matters even worse the plot is generic, the pace is snooze worthy and the whole thing is just seven shades of embarassing.
One more movie to go at time of writing, it can't get worse than this........right?
The Good:
The "Hoff" is better than usual
John Rhys-Davies
The Bad:
Poor cgi
Actually manages to be incredibly boring
The advertised "Stars" are barely in the film
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Always know the animal before the hunt
Cool girls don't look at explosions either
I guess was doomed from the start, it has a tiny budget by comparison, it's the third film in an already cheesy scyfy level franchise and the biggest star they could get to carry the movie was the "Hoff".
So yeah, it all looks so very terrible. I could do better sfx than this (And have), the snakes look pitiful and the cast look positively bored throughout.
Though Hasselhoff is better than usual he still can't carry a film and the incredible John Rhys-Davies has a heartbreakingly small role here.
To make matters even worse the plot is generic, the pace is snooze worthy and the whole thing is just seven shades of embarassing.
One more movie to go at time of writing, it can't get worse than this........right?
The Good:
The "Hoff" is better than usual
John Rhys-Davies
The Bad:
Poor cgi
Actually manages to be incredibly boring
The advertised "Stars" are barely in the film
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Always know the animal before the hunt
Cool girls don't look at explosions either
I knew from the beginning this will be a poor film, but didn't expect so many failures. To such an extent that this is more amusing than the movie itself.
Yes, the CGI is from 60-s, the acting is poor, except for Crystal Allen and Patrick Regis in few moments. But it is so funny to see anacondas move in a straight line - which is impossible for snakes! Or when David Hasselhoff dialled on the phone with all fingers simultaneously! I was sure he is misleading his companions and was surprised the phone call was not fake...
In a summary - if you enjoy to find silly mistakes in films - you're on a right place! But don't expect anything else from that movie.
Yes, the CGI is from 60-s, the acting is poor, except for Crystal Allen and Patrick Regis in few moments. But it is so funny to see anacondas move in a straight line - which is impossible for snakes! Or when David Hasselhoff dialled on the phone with all fingers simultaneously! I was sure he is misleading his companions and was surprised the phone call was not fake...
In a summary - if you enjoy to find silly mistakes in films - you're on a right place! But don't expect anything else from that movie.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizShot back-to-back with Anacondas: Trail of Blood (2009).
- BlooperWhen Amanda is in the van after it crashes, the camera first pans to the snake above her. When the camera pans back to her, a crew member can be clearly seen walking past through the window behind her.
- Curiosità sui crediti'Stage 6 Productions', the production company credited for the film, is an in-joke regarding the local Romanian service provider, 'Castel Films Romania' which has 10 sound stages on their lot, but no stage 6.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Anaconda - Sentiero di sangue (2009)
- Colonne sonoreConcerto 1052 for Harpsichord
Written by Johann Sebastian Bach (as Bach)
Performed by Garry Johnston
Courtesy of Noma Music
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Anaconda 3: Offspring
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 31 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Anaconda - La nuova stirpe (2008) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi