Swimming with Sharks

I gives this series 6 Stars based solely on the what Kieran Shipka and Diane Kruger offered. The series was 6 episodes and seemed like it was limited due to financial considerations. The premise and the potential story had merits. Unfortunately, the characters (Joyce and Lou) were not developed sufficiently which left unanswered questions about what shaped their personalities and determined their actions. And, there were substantial holes in the story, particularly in Episode 6. With appropriate development of both the characters and the storyline another 4 episodes would have been warranted. And, it easily could have been expanded to a Season 2. Unfortunately, Shipka and Kruger's brilliant portrayals we're wasted.

The re-written version of the 2022 Swimming with Sharks misses the tough-to-come-to-grips-with lessons portrayed in the 1994 original movie. The 2022 series is fine for a consumptive time-passer... The 1994 original will stick with you for life.

I see huge potential in this show and the fact that it is on Roku channel is insane, I would have expected this on a streaming service like Apple+ or even HBOMAX.

So far I find the pace to be a little slow and the writing a bit chubby but that being said the paformances are great especially from Shipka.

Give it a chance, I know I will.

This may look like prestige TV, but rest assured that it is not. It is entertaining, though. The plot twists are out of a soap opera and characters are as clichéd as they come. Donald Sutherland playing his best Harvey Weinstein is a scene stealer.

Swimming With Sharks is a case where the puzzle pieces don't fit but we're just forcing them in place, mostly based on tropes.

We have the out of town intern, Lou, played by Kiernan Shipka. She's joining the team of Fountain Pictures, run by studio chief, Joyce Holt (Diane Kruger) who still must answer to the sickly owner of the company, Redmond (Donald Sutherland). And Lou has her menacing overseers, the guys running the intern pool Alex and Travis (Ross Butler and Thomas Dekker).

The meteoric rise of Lou, from her first placement right outside of Ms. Holt's office, to becoming Holt's essential right hand is similar in tone to Don Draper's history from Ms. Shipka's previous series "Mad Men." Only Lou is more unsavory than even the 1960s Ad Exec in ways that maybe even Don himself might raise an eyebrow over.

The problem is in all of the elements to do with these characters, what we would expect them to do and what we believe about them, based on what they have done. In many of these cases, characters do or state things that don't seem to fit who they are or what we believe they would likely do in that circumstance and that always spoils the narrative.

Most importantly, with the character of Lou, I expected her to have a plan for every possible contingent, based on how she had dreamed, since childhood, of being where she was and how she has arranged everything to get herself to the upper reaches of Hollywood.

There are some definite good moments for each actor throughout, but they get skewered by all of the unbelievable ones. Everybody here deserved better.