Mystery 101: Omicidi di carta
Titolo originale: Mystery 101: Words Can Kill
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,1/10
1314
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaWhen a guest at the college book festival is killed, Amy and Travis clash after he arrests an unlikely person for murder. Amy must fight to prove he's got the wrong person behind bars.When a guest at the college book festival is killed, Amy and Travis clash after he arrests an unlikely person for murder. Amy must fight to prove he's got the wrong person behind bars.When a guest at the college book festival is killed, Amy and Travis clash after he arrests an unlikely person for murder. Amy must fight to prove he's got the wrong person behind bars.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Nat Boltt
- Celia Bunton
- (as Nathalie Boltt)
Recensioni in evidenza
10Becky145
So far this is my favorite Mystery 101. I have seen 3 now. I kind of picked out the who dunnit early but then you question things more and things definitely were not as they seemed. There was nothing obvious about all the goings ons that really happened. When they wrap it up and show what happened... you have that ahhhhhh moment. My only complaint was wardrobe put Jill in sage green outfits too many times. The final navy/magenta plum combo was refreshing and lovely.
Maybe the two Hallmark channels should change their names to some variation on the Fantasy channel. Oh, I love a lot of movies on the two channels, but in order to do so, more often than not, I have to suspend expectation for realism. Sometimes more than others. This movie has a little mystery but a lot of plot holes. It hurts my brain to even try to list them.
For starters, how about arresting a respected member of the community based on evidence that's planted in an unlocked car. This despite the fact he has no motive and there are easily two or three other people who have openly argued bitterly with the victim, including threats. I can just see the DA visiting Travis' office and asking him what he is thinking.
Another reviewer pointed out Amy contaminating the crime scene once but failed to point out at least one other time. Travis refuses to take Amy to the hotel room once in order to play it "by the books" and then lets her tag along every time after that. Then one of the key players "falls while rock climbing"? I never did figure out whether they were calling that a murder immediately. If not, why not? If so, why no reconstruction of the timeline to determine where Graham was at that time?
Like another reviewer, I had bets with myself early on whodunnit and as time went on kept doubling down until I was proved correct. My deduction was not based on any clues the characters had though. Those were pretty complicated.
The only thing that keeps bringing me back to this series is the combination of Jill Wagner and Kristoffer Polaha. Love them both. I think either one of them could connect with anyone opposite them but even so they are great together.
For starters, how about arresting a respected member of the community based on evidence that's planted in an unlocked car. This despite the fact he has no motive and there are easily two or three other people who have openly argued bitterly with the victim, including threats. I can just see the DA visiting Travis' office and asking him what he is thinking.
Another reviewer pointed out Amy contaminating the crime scene once but failed to point out at least one other time. Travis refuses to take Amy to the hotel room once in order to play it "by the books" and then lets her tag along every time after that. Then one of the key players "falls while rock climbing"? I never did figure out whether they were calling that a murder immediately. If not, why not? If so, why no reconstruction of the timeline to determine where Graham was at that time?
Like another reviewer, I had bets with myself early on whodunnit and as time went on kept doubling down until I was proved correct. My deduction was not based on any clues the characters had though. Those were pretty complicated.
The only thing that keeps bringing me back to this series is the combination of Jill Wagner and Kristoffer Polaha. Love them both. I think either one of them could connect with anyone opposite them but even so they are great together.
Who can it be knocking at my door?...
I am really enjoying the on-screen chemistry that they have slowly built over time between Amy and Travis. There is mutual admiration and respect that is evident between these two, not to mention trust and a burgeoning relationship. In this installment someone breaks in to Amy's College Campus Office the night before Amy and her College department host a book event that brings in Authors and publishers a like. Amy's father, Graham, is one of the featured authors and thus we delve into some blasts from his past. We get to meet, Amy's mother's former beau as well as her Dad's first publisher and the thief of his first novel...which is how we learn the origin story for his now wildly popular series about Atticus Keller. Over time, Travis has started to read more mystery novels...a little of Amy rubbing off on him, and in a humorous moment wants to know how he walks out of a book event having purchased more books than she did. As the cosy mystery genre demands there is a murder(...and in this case two!) for which Graham falls under suspicion and is arrested. This seems to cause a strain on Amy and Travis' burgeoning friendship...but thankfully resolved when together they put away the rightful killer.
I really enjoy the concept of Amy's college course, wish one like that was available when I went to school at the University of Washington! I also really enjoy the mystery novel tidbits that are shared...in this one the concept of the unreliable narrator is discussed along with Agatha Christie's Murder of Roger Ackroyd, which I have subsequently added to my "to read list". (Thank you!)
The mystery 101 series is fun, the mysteries are enjoyable and this is good clean entertainment
Amy and Travis are back in our screens! I love this duo. They work good together, they are fun, and their flirty banter is the best! I wish their relationship keeps growing ad getting stronger.
I think this movie was a little more complex than the previous two. It was difficult to guess who the guilty person was. Every guest character is guilty at some time and it throws you off.
One detail bothered me: Amy walking through the crime scene in her high heels? IN THE GRASS? She didn't even put on those bags on her feet, or at least a pair of trainers... and then in the next scene Travis literally says: "We need to do it by the books" I just found that funny.
Let's agree that the real hero of this movie was the front desk lady at the hotel.
I think this movie was a little more complex than the previous two. It was difficult to guess who the guilty person was. Every guest character is guilty at some time and it throws you off.
One detail bothered me: Amy walking through the crime scene in her high heels? IN THE GRASS? She didn't even put on those bags on her feet, or at least a pair of trainers... and then in the next scene Travis literally says: "We need to do it by the books" I just found that funny.
Let's agree that the real hero of this movie was the front desk lady at the hotel.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAmy wears a CLUE game piece on a necklace or a magnifying glass on a chain in this film. Her office also has CLUE game pieces as statues. The rope, lead pipe, gun, wrench, candlestick and knife can be seen in the background. The game Clue is known as Cluedo in the United Kingdom.
- ConnessioniFollowed by Mystery 101: Discorsi letali (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Words Can Kill
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada(location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 24 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti