The Devil's Whore

THE DEVIL'S MISTRESS (The Devil's Wh*re) (2008) was a pretty interesting series, that immediately drew me in with promises to learn more of the mysteries of the English Civil War (1636 - 1660) though it didn't necessarily live up to the high expectations it set in that regard, it was however, studded with a cast of stars, who all played their parts marvelously, flaws or not and offered insights into the era's turbulence, as well as political, social, moral, religious and sexual politics of the day, if not beheld from a modern eye.

It follows Angelica Fanshawe (Andrea Riseborough), a young "modern-minded" woman who sees strange visions of the devil, as the country is about to be torn in half with the impending civil war. She is torn between her Aristocratic Catholic identity and between her rising beliefs in the Rebel Leveller cause, rising up against the dated Monarchal/Aristocratic systems.

The cast was exceptional. Andrea Riseborough, John Simm, Michael Fassbender, Dominic West, Peter Capaldi, Tom Goodman-Hill, and Maxine Peake were all very memorable in their roles which made this series worth while. My favorite acted were John Simm (as the Edward Sexby), Peter Capaldi (as King Charles I), Michael Fassbender (as Thomas Rainsborough) and Andrea Riseborough (as Angelica Fanshawe).

Overall, it was an intriguing yet somewhat melodramatic show, with a few shining exceptions. The character of Angelica was of a love-hate for me, giving me very mixed emotions. Sometimes she felt strong and wise, and other times she seemed whiney and naive. Also, the series tried to imply she loved "men of ideas", but more often than not it seemed her "loves" were "lust at first sight" variety and not very deep at all. I was however, a fan of the tragic, scarred, grey colored, and somewhat cruel character of Edward Sexby (John Simm). He made for an interesting anti-hero, a man that you both fear and root for. His character is one you can deeply brood over, impossibly sad, hopeless and yet inspiring. You want him to find redemption and love, but he walks a tragic path indeed. The pair have an unspeakable chemistry and unique bond, making it impossibly difficult to look away when either / both are on screen. Highly effective technique.

The series was really moving and memorable, highlighting historical events and showcasing the darkers sides of human natures, but too often lowered itself into scenes of melodrama and gratuitous titilation, rather than focusing on the characters development and factual historical events, and the few historical events shown seemed lightly brushed over and not given the time desserved. Perhaps this was due to lower budget or time contraints or both? This series would have been so much greater if given more time and episodes. But still overall, a highly enjoyable series of two tragic figures living through a horrible war and torn country, with divided morals and questionable loyalties, that lingers on in the mind.

I can't believe that I know so little about the English Civil War and this series has stimulated me to learn more. The characters were portrayed so well that I feel I want to know so much more about those who were real people. John Simm's performance as Edward Sexby haunts me because he spent so much time longing for a relationship with Angelica, then finally reached his goal, only to move away from her again towards another greater goal. It was inspiring, and I was captivated by the visual impact and the political power of the plot. Like the West Wing, the Devil's Whore managed to make me interested in political issues that may seem dull elsewhere. Oliver Cromwell came across as a real man and most of the real historical figures were 3-dimensional. Angelica was fascinating and powerful, and it doesn't matter that she was not real historically - she held the story together. The details of the struggle between the monarch and the parliamentarians is very gripping and is at the roots of our present system of democracy - probably the model for all democracies.

As a Quaker, I need to know as much as possible about this period in English history, because out of the many religious and political groups which grew up in the turbulence of the 17th century, the Society of Friends is one that has survived adapted to modern life - something that the Ranters and Levellers were unable to do.

Overall, my main impression was one of fascination with the story of Angelica's life and Sexby's devotion to her - it was a great inspiring tale. Such a shame that it had to be cut down from 12 episodes to 4 - how much more would we have gained if we could have seen all that was planned?

Excellently entertaining series with some interesting slants on the history but I appreciate that the writers did not set out to create a drama-documentary. Although they did incorporate some historical accuracy, anyone not knowing the real history of the Civil War could/would be very confused by some of the content. The real Thomas Rainsborough did not marry someone called Angelica Fanshawe and he is buried in the now disappeared graveyard of St John's, Wapping.

Pity that IMD have posted a picture of John Simm/Sexby's stand-in rather than JS/Sexby himself!!!!!

I am also totally stunned that the makers of the series insisted that they could not find suitable filming locations in the UK. I could have suggested any number of suitable locations both privately owned (but the owners have allowed filming) and NT or English Heritage. It seems amazing that with so much Tudor and Jacobean property here, not to mention forests etc that they deemed it necessary to ship cast and crew several thousand miles away to South Africa.

Well, I had high hopes for this mini series from across the Atlantic, and some of those expectations were met, but, as I should have expected, others were dashed.

The production values are of high caliber. Costumes, sets and locations, particularly for a British mini series, are all exceptional. There's very little in the way of criticism when it comes to poking at the amount of money and care that went into the recreation of late renaissance Britain. Truly, a first rate production where all imagery is concerned.

So where does this small collection of films fall flat? This is going to sound sexist, but it truly isn't, it's a comment aimed at the continued market trend for television; the series was aimed specifically at a female audience with only the superficiality of placating to masculine interests. Every male in this series of films is portrayed as boorish on some level. From Royalists to Parliamentarians, and shades of gray in-between, few of these men have a spine.

Additionally, they're all sex starved. They either are biding their time for sexual favors, or are so wanton as to be willing to force themselves on he fairer sex. They seem to have little else on their minds. And when they are granted female accompaniment, they then squander their "victory" in some sort of stupidity.

That's not really a comment on what I think of society as I think of what TV producers think their audiences want to see. Again, as I've written in other reviews, the TV producer thinking is that since women buy things for the home, it is therefore that audience that the shows must cater to.

"The Devil's Whore" is no different. The concepts and ideals for which both sides of the English Civil War fought are hardly ever mentioned. It seems to be the assumption that said notions have no place within the female psyche, and therefore are not worth exposition. Female concerns are for family, friends and young ones.

So what does one do? The man who watches this can do little but shake his head, and maybe say "Huh, the 60's film with Richard Harris was a bit more entertaining..." Which, in my view, it was.

But the film with Harris had the benefit of being a high budget major theatrical film. It wasn't some one off made for TV mini series that had to compete with "Dancing with the Stars" or other sub-IQ fodder that masks for entertainment.

You may say, "Mister Blueghost, what were you expecting?" Look, I knew this was going to be a TV miniseries about a woman during the English Civil War, but I expected the Powers-that-Be in the UK to do their usual bucking of American market research, and make a film for both sexes and most ages. Something intelligent. Something with a little more purposeful action than the banal placation presented in this film's battle-sequences.

In short, it was a pleasure to see something not made by and for American house-wives and professional women, but it was equally disappointing to see something made for British house-wives and professional women.

*sigh*

Well, maybe I'll whip out my copy of Cromwell tonight, and grin as I see Richard Harris give a high energy performance in his Irish-thesping style of portraying a historic figure who didn't like the Irish a great deal.

Well, I think I've learned my lesson about splurging on a UK TV series of which I know nothing.

Watch at your risk.

I have little knowledge of the historical period on which this is based but it gave a pretty good idea of the socio political situation. All the actors were excellent and Michael Fassbender as Thomas Rainsborough was exceptional.