The Nan Movie
- 2022
- 1h 35min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,8/10
1814
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.A foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.A foul-mouthed and recalcitrant elderly woman reluctantly agrees to a road trip with her grandson to visit her estranged, dying sister.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
This was always going to be rubbish. I can't believe they got this film funded.
I'd rather watch paint dry than ever see this again, and I truly mean that.
I'd rather watch paint dry than ever see this again, and I truly mean that.
Typical Catherine Tate cheesy,some good parts but didn't do it for me.
Wouldn't rush to watch anything else with Catherine Tate it.
Acting poor by two main characters.
Wouldn't rush to watch anything else with Catherine Tate it.
Acting poor by two main characters.
I was never much of a Catherine Tate fan. I remember her programme being popular years ago and recall her stints on Doctor Who and the Office (US). I cannnot understand why around 10-15 years after she was relevant in UK popular culture there has been a movie made bringing one of her old characters out of retirement. Their is surely not enough of an appetite for this even amongst avid viewers at the time. Despite this I went along for a Sunday viewing and was pretty appaled with the quality on display. The jokes mainly fall flat and the story just becomes tediously boring. The constant flashbacks are dull for the most part and I didn't find the character of Nan herself to be likeable or interesting. That laugh was really getting on my t*ts. There is all the usual tropes of a rubbish comedy film- scene where unassuming character takes hardcore drugs, some poorly-edited action scenes to break up the jokes and of course a stupid looking vechile for the leads to travel about in from one mind numbingly dull scene to the next.
Also, Nan looks at least 30 in the early 1940s but can still crowdsurf in a giant rave like its nothing. Should she not be over 100?? Sadly I would suggest giving this one a hard swerve. Comedy movies rarely come out these days and efforts like this do nothing to serve the cause.
Also, Nan looks at least 30 in the early 1940s but can still crowdsurf in a giant rave like its nothing. Should she not be over 100?? Sadly I would suggest giving this one a hard swerve. Comedy movies rarely come out these days and efforts like this do nothing to serve the cause.
I didn't come into this with many expectations, but thought it might be a bit of a daft laugh. It pretty much wasn't. Having read the trivia re the re-cutting of the film it starts to make sense how someone of the stature of the great Katherine Parkinson allowed herself to be in such tosh. This is puerile rubbish. Honestly, don't waste your time.
I will start by saying that this movie is, probably, about 10 years too late. Had this been made early '10's, I can imagine a better response. The jokes are outdated and we've heard them all before. The 'present' scenes are predictable though I found the ending to be really good.
The 'past' scenes I thought were amazing, and my four stars are for them. The movie would have been better going down the route of Nan telling Jamie about the past without a road trip, then ending with the meeting. Catherine and Katherine did a good job in those scenes.
The worst part was, by far, the out of place and ridiculous animation that bought nothing to the movie.
So, would I recommend the film?
Sober - No.
After a few drinks - Sure.
Go in with low expectations and I think you'll enjoy the movie due to the flashbacks.
The 'past' scenes I thought were amazing, and my four stars are for them. The movie would have been better going down the route of Nan telling Jamie about the past without a road trip, then ending with the meeting. Catherine and Katherine did a good job in those scenes.
The worst part was, by far, the out of place and ridiculous animation that bought nothing to the movie.
So, would I recommend the film?
Sober - No.
After a few drinks - Sure.
Go in with low expectations and I think you'll enjoy the movie due to the flashbacks.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe first cut of the film was delivered to investors in 2019. It originally consisted predominantly of scenes set in 1940s London focusing on a young Joan Taylor. The investors were uncomfortable with the film's focus on World War 2, and insisted the flashback sequences be cut back significantly to accommodate much more of the present-day plot with the elderly Joan Taylor, whom fans of The Catherine Tate Show would recognize. New footage, greatly expanding the modern-day road trip sections, was filmed without director Josie Rourke at a low-cost, with animation sequences also used to fill any gaps. As a result of these additions, Rourke had her director's credit removed, and the released cut of the film simply does not have a director credit.
- BlooperWhen Walter is sent to France he is depicted at a station with LNER signage. This is incorrect if he is leaving London to go to France since the LNER ran north out of London. The most likely way to get to the south coast ports would be on the Southern Railway or, less likely, on the GWR to Weymouth or Plymouth.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Projector: The Nan Movie (2022)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Nan Movie?Powered by Alexa
- I was really looking forward to watching this film this year! When will we get a new release date and a trailer?
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.167.020 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 35 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Nan Movie (2022) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi