VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,5/10
2401
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaFollowing the success of their first album, the Fisherman's Friends struggle to adjust to their new-found fame and work towards a second album.Following the success of their first album, the Fisherman's Friends struggle to adjust to their new-found fame and work towards a second album.Following the success of their first album, the Fisherman's Friends struggle to adjust to their new-found fame and work towards a second album.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Recensioni in evidenza
I loved the first one, I'm 35 and it's not my genre of music or movie but I loved it, was one of the last I watched with my uncle before he passed.
I think either people are desperate to point score or it was written in to every contract for British film and tv that they have to acknowledge all this PC rubbish of this generation who want change without any work or changing themselves to be better people. It was so unnecessary in so many ways, I heard audible groans in the audience, people are so sick of it. It's creating a theme of good people hating on something that should be good, anyway it added to nothing and took some of the magic away.
The storyline was pointless really, they've aged a bit and now the guy thinks they're past it so won't give them a new deal, there's acknowledgment of a death In the group and a forced love angle where the couple had no chemistry. Plus an angle where a fisherman hates a farmer because I guess that's a thing. There was no magic, no natural innocence or excitement , it felt unnecessary, uninteresting and uninspired.
The thing is now there's so many remakes, sequels or spin offs I'm not sure the film industry can actually make as many top tier films.
The acting was alright, pretty bland, bar 2 or 3 the names you won't remember, some don't even speak! The Glastonbury stuff was awfully filmed and executed. Then there's the last song, dear god I just felt ashamed thinking of some group of imbeciles sitting patting themselves on the back for calling the final song "union of different colours" even though they sing the lyric as "kinds"
I don't understand why they think forcing it into everything will fix the ignorant, they're a bad kinda people who won't be taught easily.
The film lacked what made the first a solid 8.5/9. Music was good, that's the only thing stopping it from going to a 2.
I think either people are desperate to point score or it was written in to every contract for British film and tv that they have to acknowledge all this PC rubbish of this generation who want change without any work or changing themselves to be better people. It was so unnecessary in so many ways, I heard audible groans in the audience, people are so sick of it. It's creating a theme of good people hating on something that should be good, anyway it added to nothing and took some of the magic away.
The storyline was pointless really, they've aged a bit and now the guy thinks they're past it so won't give them a new deal, there's acknowledgment of a death In the group and a forced love angle where the couple had no chemistry. Plus an angle where a fisherman hates a farmer because I guess that's a thing. There was no magic, no natural innocence or excitement , it felt unnecessary, uninteresting and uninspired.
The thing is now there's so many remakes, sequels or spin offs I'm not sure the film industry can actually make as many top tier films.
The acting was alright, pretty bland, bar 2 or 3 the names you won't remember, some don't even speak! The Glastonbury stuff was awfully filmed and executed. Then there's the last song, dear god I just felt ashamed thinking of some group of imbeciles sitting patting themselves on the back for calling the final song "union of different colours" even though they sing the lyric as "kinds"
I don't understand why they think forcing it into everything will fix the ignorant, they're a bad kinda people who won't be taught easily.
The film lacked what made the first a solid 8.5/9. Music was good, that's the only thing stopping it from going to a 2.
This film brought a lot of joy to the audience. It's less of a comedy than the first but doesn't overdo it on the drama side of things. Purefoy delivers a strong performance.
I think this film knows it's audience and caters to them well. It is almost like comfort food in a movie.
It's just a bit of a shame the script wasn't a bit better. Everything is just so predictable throughout the film and there seem to be plenty of storylines that don't really go anywhere.
It's just a bit of a shame the script wasn't a bit better. Everything is just so predictable throughout the film and there seem to be plenty of storylines that don't really go anywhere.
This is a good movie - suitable for watching as a family or even when dating. It has light romance, light comedy, feel good results. Of course, the singing is really good. A bit clinche at times but overall pretty entertaining. The acting is good, scenery nice and humor entertainingly. I like the fact that they did not use super model figures as their male and female leads. The cast reflects regular folks and that contributed to the film being believable. Some parts are predictable but overall it's good entertainment and you feel happy having watched the movie. It is well paced too - not a dull moment.
I wasn't the biggest fan of the first movie, watchable but boring... Maybe a 4 or 5 out of 10; but my partner liked it and there wasn't much to choose from at the cinema this weekend so I reluctantly agreed to go with him. I entered the theatre with low expectations...
Boy was I pleasantly surprised! Yes, it's not blockbuster movie, nor worthy of an Oscar (most Oscar winners are overrated guff anyway) and a couple of the supporting cast members are very poor in regards to their acting talent.
BUUUTTTT overall it's enjoyable, heart warming and you leave with a smile on your face.
Worth a watch for sure, and believable or not, it is actually a true story.
Boy was I pleasantly surprised! Yes, it's not blockbuster movie, nor worthy of an Oscar (most Oscar winners are overrated guff anyway) and a couple of the supporting cast members are very poor in regards to their acting talent.
BUUUTTTT overall it's enjoyable, heart warming and you leave with a smile on your face.
Worth a watch for sure, and believable or not, it is actually a true story.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe sea shanty song ''Bound for South Australia'' was heard in the original 'Fisherman's Friends' (2019) film which was set and filmed in Port Isaac in Cornwall, England. The Yorke Peninsula in South Australia has a strong Cornish lineage and has strong connections with Cornwall through its Cornish culture, legacy and heritage.
- Curiosità sui creditiDuring the end credits, scenes of the real Fisherman's Friends are shown in their van on the way to Glastonbury Festival to sing.
- ConnessioniFollows Fisherman's Friends (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Fisherman's Friends: One and All?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Fisherman's Friends 2
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Port Isaac, Cornwall, Inghilterra, Regno Unito(The village and harbour where most of film is based)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.788.511 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Fisherman's Friends: One and All (2022) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi