VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,1/10
1796
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Gli spiriti maligni liberati dalla vecchia celluloide fanno impazzire lentamente una troupe cinematografica durante la produzione di un nuovo progetto.Gli spiriti maligni liberati dalla vecchia celluloide fanno impazzire lentamente una troupe cinematografica durante la produzione di un nuovo progetto.Gli spiriti maligni liberati dalla vecchia celluloide fanno impazzire lentamente una troupe cinematografica durante la produzione di un nuovo progetto.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Jack Dimich
- Romanian Grip
- (as a different name)
Recensioni in evidenza
I can see why some reviewers thought this film was a bit messy. But I can see how that adds to the, this person is loosing their mind and what is, and what is not actually real. I thought some of the ideas here were cool.
It's not the best work for this director, but I thought it was still a pretty interesting watch. It has some cool ideas, and the idea behind the story was pretty interesting too. Like finding out more depth behind the spirit the filming is meant to be about would have made this a better film.
The acting and script are pretty average, but overall I think the film is worth a watch.
It's not the best work for this director, but I thought it was still a pretty interesting watch. It has some cool ideas, and the idea behind the story was pretty interesting too. Like finding out more depth behind the spirit the filming is meant to be about would have made this a better film.
The acting and script are pretty average, but overall I think the film is worth a watch.
I may not be an expert in psychopharmocology, but I do know when it is time to take your medication.
The formula has been repeated so often you have to wonder why they don't just quit.
Take a good Japanese suspense film of the same name, which was directed by Hideo Nakata (The Ring Trilogy), and had a screenplay by Hiroshi Takahashi, who also wrote the screenplays for the Ring Trilogy. and bring in a big time director (Fruit Chan) and someone to adapt the screenplay to add gore instead of suspense (Brian Cox), add some American eye candy (Rachael Murphy), and you have a film that is a pale imitation of the original directed to teens.
Forget the eye candy, find the original.
Take a good Japanese suspense film of the same name, which was directed by Hideo Nakata (The Ring Trilogy), and had a screenplay by Hiroshi Takahashi, who also wrote the screenplays for the Ring Trilogy. and bring in a big time director (Fruit Chan) and someone to adapt the screenplay to add gore instead of suspense (Brian Cox), add some American eye candy (Rachael Murphy), and you have a film that is a pale imitation of the original directed to teens.
Forget the eye candy, find the original.
I have to admit, I only found out about this oddity, because I was looking for the way better known "Don't look up" from 2021. But this popped up as one of the results too here on imdb and reading this being a horror my interest was piqued. And since it was available to rent on Prime, I thought why not and here we are.
My story aside (I wonder if yours is similar), the movie has quite a few flaws. But it also has an intersting cast - and an almost completely miscast Eli Roth in one of the roles. He was far better in Tarantinos movie - and of course behind the camera as a director. But his contribution is minor and probably only a favor - or maybe just a fun cameo day at the set.
Whatever it was, the rest of the cast is quite convincing too. They may be over-explaining certain things (like certain film related stuff that they should know anyway, but they elaborate because of the viewers), but they seem to know what they are doing ... are they also too deep into it to realize many things are wrong? Or is everything a trick of ones mind? If only ET was here to help ... I'm not even sure if everyone will recognize Henry Thomas from the ET movie - doesn't even matter.
Not the best horror I have seen, but most definitely not the worst I have seen either ... effects are nice, considering the budget.
My story aside (I wonder if yours is similar), the movie has quite a few flaws. But it also has an intersting cast - and an almost completely miscast Eli Roth in one of the roles. He was far better in Tarantinos movie - and of course behind the camera as a director. But his contribution is minor and probably only a favor - or maybe just a fun cameo day at the set.
Whatever it was, the rest of the cast is quite convincing too. They may be over-explaining certain things (like certain film related stuff that they should know anyway, but they elaborate because of the viewers), but they seem to know what they are doing ... are they also too deep into it to realize many things are wrong? Or is everything a trick of ones mind? If only ET was here to help ... I'm not even sure if everyone will recognize Henry Thomas from the ET movie - doesn't even matter.
Not the best horror I have seen, but most definitely not the worst I have seen either ... effects are nice, considering the budget.
I originally picked this movie to watch after reading the plot. It seemed different from most movies so I thought I was seeing something new that would grab my attention. When getting the movie home, I read the reviews on here and saw it was a "bad" horror film. Still, I took my chances.
I can see why many do not like this film. There is no definite beginning or end, leaving you to question the purpose of the entire movie. The plot seems to change focus from the movie production to the mental state of the producer.
Let it be known, this is NOT a horror movie. There are "intense" images placed in scenes without much thought (i.e. the flashbacks the main character gets). The idea is probably to shock the viewer when they least expect it. The "gore" in the movie is less frightening than taking a stroll through the butcher's shop to pick up dinner. I do not understand how this movie is rated R. It lacks the core elements which would make a movie "R" - gore, language, and nudity. This movie is all about the deteriorating mental state of the "producer" inside the movie, which is fun to watch if you're into that kind of thing. The acting was subpar; I think a high school play crew could act the scenes better than the actors hired for this movie. Overall this movie gets a 3/10. They tried and came up short.
I can see why many do not like this film. There is no definite beginning or end, leaving you to question the purpose of the entire movie. The plot seems to change focus from the movie production to the mental state of the producer.
Let it be known, this is NOT a horror movie. There are "intense" images placed in scenes without much thought (i.e. the flashbacks the main character gets). The idea is probably to shock the viewer when they least expect it. The "gore" in the movie is less frightening than taking a stroll through the butcher's shop to pick up dinner. I do not understand how this movie is rated R. It lacks the core elements which would make a movie "R" - gore, language, and nudity. This movie is all about the deteriorating mental state of the "producer" inside the movie, which is fun to watch if you're into that kind of thing. The acting was subpar; I think a high school play crew could act the scenes better than the actors hired for this movie. Overall this movie gets a 3/10. They tried and came up short.
Normally I don't write reviews... although after watching this movie, it marked my life in such ways I had to leave a comment and warn others. Just spare yourself the misery. This movie shows promise at the start, thinking of such urban legends as the filming of The Exorcist... yet sadly it fails to deliver. The plot is very poor to say the least, and the main character inspires as much empathy in his role as a mad director, that by the end of the movie you are actually rooting for something to happen to him. The movie ends, and ends again, then ends strangely... and I now have to find a way to wash my brain of this dreg...
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe name of the director of the original film is Bela Olt. One of Bela Lugosi's early stage names was Arisztid Olt.
- ConnessioniReferences Frankenstein (1931)
- Colonne sonoreGaze At Me
Performed by Doping Panda
Composed by Yutaka Furukawa
Published by Sony Music Artists, Inc. (JASRAC)
(p)2009 Sony Music Records, Inc.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 25min(85 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti