Recensioni degli utenti

Yes it is a cheesy, contrived, feel good wedding movie. Yet somehow the team pulls it off, don't expect anything deep or meaningful, just take it for what it is, a feel good piece of entertainment to make us happy and the production crew a salary. Probably a pretty good one.

So Diane Keaton is a lovely actress and I do enjoy feel good movies. But this is plainly boring except for the opening scene, which was funny. Oh yes, I forgot, the Russian woman and the brother in chains was OK. Apart from that, this was a snooze fest.

Of course, it was not the best movie with mini-stories that turn out to be connected (those are still the ones made by Garry Marshall), and at times it was a little stupid, but it was still entertaining. We were laughing out loud at the physical comedy! I also found it fun that it was filmed in Boston - I even spotted bottles of Bully Boy at the bar!

Terrible. One of the worst movies ever. Watched at home, and would have walked out but my dog was asleep on my lap. Omg....

OMG what an absolute pile of rubbish, do not be fooled by the fact they somehow (god only knows) managed to cast Keaton and Irons in this disaster of a movie.

I'm so glad I watched it at home as I was able to turn it off after the painful 40 minutes I actually gave trying to give it a chance.

Feels like a made for TV movie without the cheese.

Don't know why there are so many haters for this one. As somebody who normally avoids Diane Keaton movies, I was surprised by how good this one was. I think they could have stretched it out a bit longer to fill in a bit more for each of the different couples, but there wasn't one dull moment, great pacing, lots of laughs, great date movie.

'Love, Weddings and Other Disasters' was watched with very mixed expectations, leaning closer towards intrepidation. Have enjoyed/love a good deal of Diane Keaton's work and Jeremy Irons is one of my all time favourite actors, and they (particularly Irons) were the reasons for watching. The advertising and trailers did not look promising to put it lightly, word of mouth was generally awful and Dennis Dugan is something of a dread name in my eyes.

While there are worse films around, there is very little to love about 'Love, Weddings and Other Disasters' and overall it is a disaster and really is that bad on the whole. This is coming from someone too who likes comedy and romance and who has no problem with films with multiple storylines. By all means it is nowhere near as bad as 'Jack and Jill', it takes a lot of doing for any film to be on that level of abominable, and the valiant work Keaton and Irons give to save it is truly admirable, but they are much better than this and deserved much better.

There are a couple of redeeming merits. Keaton and against type Irons attack their roles and material with spirited enthusiasm and have a truly delightful chemistry, the only source of charm in the film.

Keaton also has the film's best line in her reaction to Laurence's note, echoing the viewer's sentiments in their frustration at one of the worst cases of the many ridiculous character behaviours.

Can say nothing else good however. The rest of the cast do not work. Maggie Grace tries but has a bland character and she at the end of the day comes over as that. Worst of all is Dugan's cameo, which is just embarrassing (one of the worst since Madonna's in 'Die Another Day'), coming over as insufferably irritating. The soundtrack is not just forgettable but it even more grates and is overused and random to an ill fitting degree. Dugan's direction shows how incompetent he can be behind the camera, showing a complete disregard for pace, which throughout is erratic and lacking in energy), or subtlety, which seems to be an alien word to Dugan.

Furthermore, the story is very disjointed, having four subplots and instead of tying together nicely it feels like four different films in one and only one of them being marginally watchable. They also feel unrelated and then are tied too predictably and neatly. The gameshow one is particularly inept and the cringe factor was through the roof. Of the four, only Keaton and Irons' has some degree of success and that was a long way from perfect. There is very little warmth or charm, when it comes to romance it is bland other than with Keaton and Irons.

On top of that, 'Love, Weddings and Other Disasters' is a complete disaster when it comes to the comedy other than one line from Keaton. The dialogue is crude and juvenile with no sophistication or subtlety in sight, and it constantly sounds awkward. Too many of the comedic set pieces are overlong and distasteful, with one of the worst offenders being the scene on the escalator. The character bore and/or irritate and there are too many stupid character decisions (such as Laurence writing the note and the gameshow subplot is rife with them). It doesn't even look good, the camera work is poorly framed with bacon slicer like editing that wastes the lovely locations.

In conclusion, really, really bad. 2/10.

It's not bad, however considering the synopsis and the casting of actors I expected much more, very little eh funny, it went far from romanticism, exaggerated situations, which keep us away from empathy, making it less pleasant than it could have been...

This film was recommended by some web site and it was quite impossible to enjoy. You've seen it before: the quirky characters (all of them) speaking fast, smiling, making jokes and having mishaps, but in the end coming together and becoming better. I found all characters incredibly grating. I know it's targeted to an audience that likes to think they are quirky and interesting when in fact they are annoying and stupid, so I understand where it came from, but the characters and setup alone just made it feel like a bad stand-up comedy show: A guy comes on stage, starts telling you about his friends and family, laughing at his own jokes, and you just don't see what he thinks it's funny, but you paid for the seat and your date is laughing so you endure. The scene where some relatives arrive at work with an impromptu date "intervention", where the blind date is actually blind and the first thing she does is topple a table was cringeworthy and quite offensive for both table makers and blind people. Ugh!

Funny enough, I wanted to see this film with my wife and she had other things to do. It was the right choice.

And it's too bad, because the actors in the film are doing a decent job, or at least I have a lot of nostalgia about them so I didn't mind their work. The thing is, this was released in 2020 and it feels like a 1990 movie with futuristic phones.

I laughed right the way thru this one. Some rediculous parts but overall it was great so I can get past it. We thoroughly enjoyed it.

It's cute. Funny. Has some issues but definitely entertaining. And there's a great soundtrack! Worth a watch if you live a rom com. And of course a fantastic cast!

There is so much wrong with this movie which is unfortunate because at heart it could have worked. But it just felt a little wooden and clunky. It was like everyone was just going through the motions to make a buck on another poor imitation of the great British rom com movies. As for the actors, Jeremy Irons was good but the others were below par.

Was it perfect? Lol-Not at all.

However did have overall parts,that made it watchable.

Casting was decent,most of the storylines & cinematography too.

How can be such a disappointment...? Boring, boring, waste of time.

Did they really make the 'blind date joke' shocking. Waste of cast.

How could something starring Keaton and Irons be so miserably awful, nah, cringe-worthy. They should both be horribly embarrassed, esp. Keaton, who is offensive in her portrayal of a blind woman (and the tokenism of having a dwarf character and then making fun of him is also reprehensible). The other story lines are almost equally abhorrent - only Maggie Grace manages not to be a total waste of time. There is a reason this only has a 4% 'fresh' rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Avoid it like the plague it is.

How this movie is only rated a 5 is beyond me. Cute, funny, and well done! A very pleasant surprise. So if you're looking for a mindless, but sweet rom-com to pass away some Friday evening, this will certainly fit the bill.

I love Maggie Grace and Diane Keaton but they couldn't save this flop. Disjointed ridiculous storyline. Bad acting and no humour. I actually left the cinema 1 hour in I could not take it anymore

This starts slow and disjointed, almost reminiscent of a bad version of Love Actually. By the second half it has picked up and you start to relate to the characters, everything slowly makes more sense and you get the expected happy feel good Cinderella ending.

My God, how do Jeremy Irons and Diane Keaton descend to this?

I cannot understand the panning of this film in many of the reviews here. I thought this film was very sweet and had some great talent. This film was such an unexpected surprise considering the world we're living in at the moment. It's not groundbreaking but it's not supposed to be. It's a romantic comedy- lighten up!

This is an ok romcom. Performances by Irons,Keating and Maggie Grace are good . The film has some laughs but is predictable.