Un lord scozzese viene convinto da un trio di streghe che diventerà il prossimo re di Scozia e la sua ambiziosa moglie lo sostiene nei suoi piani di conquista del potere.Un lord scozzese viene convinto da un trio di streghe che diventerà il prossimo re di Scozia e la sua ambiziosa moglie lo sostiene nei suoi piani di conquista del potere.Un lord scozzese viene convinto da un trio di streghe che diventerà il prossimo re di Scozia e la sua ambiziosa moglie lo sostiene nei suoi piani di conquista del potere.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Candidato a 3 Oscar
- 20 vittorie e 115 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
To my mind it bears comparison with Orson Welles inexpensive version.
This is not a low budget version and it boasts heavyweights both behind and in front of the camera. Joel Coen, his wife Frances McDormand and Denzel Washington have 10 Oscars between them.
Denzel Washington as Macbeth starts out as low key before being consumed by his thirst for power as he is approached by the witches. (A contorted performance by Kathryn Hunter.)
To becomes the King of Scotland, he overthrows King Duncan (Brendan Gleeson) with the full support of the scheming Lady Macbeth (Frances McDormand) who likes the idea of becoming Queen.
Macbeth's corruption and paranoia invites revenge from Duncan's heir and Macduff. There is civil war in Scotland.
The text is dense but the film remains accessible. Coen has kept the play stripped down and stagebound.
Lady Macbeth who starts as clever and crafty becomes slowly mad to match her crazed husband.
Hunter shines as the witches. There are good performances from Bertie Carvel as Banquo and Alex Hassell as Ross.
There are a range of accents on offer in the movie, but very few Scottish ones.
Also the actors all acting with their emotions on 11, with it all being depressing seems to draw praises and Oscars like the best of baits. Never mind the dreary, long and uninspired monologues (or dialogues if "lucky").
Doesnt anyone have any original ideas anymore? Cant you portray Macbeth in a new, original light and add something new to it, shape it into a form(format we havent seen yet, make it appealing to newer and/or younger audiences. Make it entertaining, informative, moral and multilayered.
Always making these dark, minimalistic and overboard in every aspects productions has gotten beyond boring, bland and a work to get through.
Cinema should be inviting, exploring, adventerous, imaginative, new... This is NOT that, not by a long shot, it is a deja-vu of numerous productions past.
Denzel and Frances are masters in their own right. While their performances as the Macbeths may not be as striking as Hunter's, they nonetheless make for a very good pair to carry this film's weight, and each bring a grounded freshness to their lines. One thing I really appreciate was that they didn't "rise themselves up" to the weight of these characters, but rather brought the characters down to them. Instead of expanding their presence to fill the shoes of giants, they let the words filter through them with the coolness of their own natural presence. I could see and hear Denzel and Frances adopt the text in their own cadence/mannerisms, and (to quote another Shakespeare play) "acquire and beget a temperance that may give it smoothness."
Finally, Joel's vision really makes this adaptation stand out. Its aesthetic is a clever blend of film and theatre, employing the intimacy of one with the uncanny semblance of the other. Not only does this effect serve the presence of ghosts and witches well, but it gives the whole piece an almost dream-like quality that draws you in like the air-drawn dagger. But beyond that, Joel's understanding of the text and concept as a whole is so sharp that his own changes to certain scenes/characters offer a savvy new take on a 400 year old tale.
The Coens (even though this is just Joel) are my favorite directors, the cast is incredible and the vibe certainly resonates, but even then I found it to be hollow. I was waiting for that Oscar moment from DENZEL, but it looked like he was contained throughout the production.
I will certainly review the film - with subtitles - to see what that does, but I walked out feeling empty. I thought this would walk away with film of the year, but I don't think it'll even end up in the Top 5 or 10.
Maybe I am the idiot looking for the Sound and Fury that should accompany one of best tales of all time.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe first solo directorial effort by Joel Coen. All of his previous films have been co-directed with his brother Ethan Coen, though Ethan was uncredited as director until 2004 due to DGA rules about directing duos.
- BlooperWhen Banquo and Fleance prepare to leave, Macbeth tells them their horses are ready. But Denzel Washington gets the line backwards. He says, "I commend them to your backs," instead of "I commend you to their backs." He speaks of plural horses, but in the next shot, Fleance is riding the only horse, and Banquo is walking.
- Citazioni
Macbeth: Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace from day to day to the last syllable of recorded time. And all our yesterdays have lighted fools the way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle. Life is but a walking shadow... a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot... full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
- Colonne sonoreFair Is Foul (feat. Kathryn Hunter)
Artist: Carter Burwell
I più visti
- How long is The Tragedy of Macbeth?Powered by Alexa
- What about Banquo?
- Aren't the two leads far too old for their roles?
- Why do the Weird Sisters tell Macbeth that he will be king?
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- La tragedia de Macbeth
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 524.771 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 45 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1