VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,0/10
45.263
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un giovane ingenuo assume l'identità di un uomo morto e si ritrova coinvolto in un mondo sotterraneo di potere, violenza e possibilità in cui gli uomini giocano a porte chiuse sulla vita di ... Leggi tuttoUn giovane ingenuo assume l'identità di un uomo morto e si ritrova coinvolto in un mondo sotterraneo di potere, violenza e possibilità in cui gli uomini giocano a porte chiuse sulla vita di altri uomini.Un giovane ingenuo assume l'identità di un uomo morto e si ritrova coinvolto in un mondo sotterraneo di potere, violenza e possibilità in cui gli uomini giocano a porte chiuse sulla vita di altri uomini.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Alice Barrett-Mitchell
- Leanne Ferro
- (as Alice Barrett Mitchell)
Mike D'Onofrio
- Frank
- (as Michael D'Onofrio)
Recensioni in evidenza
I did not see the Original "13", so this review is solely based on the re-creation. I actually enjoyed this movie. It was fast paced and had a nice rhythm to it. I thought some of the background stories from some of the contestants (Micky Rourke's character) weren't needed, and the MC of the event was annoying. I also couldn't figure out why people would gamble so much money on a game of chance with little to no skill involved. I would give this a higher grade but the ending was absolutely terrible. It left more questions than answers.
I really don't understand how movies like this get made. Step one, half ass a cast together of "big names" and provide a silly premise.
Step two, give someone top billing even though their role is the lesser part of 5 minutes.
Step three, find a rapper that has no talent so that your culturally bereft urban youth have a reason to see the movie.
Step four,rely upon arty cinematography as the culturalification of the movie, legitimizing that its no better than a bottom shelf rental.
Alright, get the idea? movies these days suck, no wonder I won't pay to see one.
Step two, give someone top billing even though their role is the lesser part of 5 minutes.
Step three, find a rapper that has no talent so that your culturally bereft urban youth have a reason to see the movie.
Step four,rely upon arty cinematography as the culturalification of the movie, legitimizing that its no better than a bottom shelf rental.
Alright, get the idea? movies these days suck, no wonder I won't pay to see one.
Yes, the video photography was great, wonderful actors were involved in the project however, if your looking for a good movie to watch this is not the best choice. The beginning is slow, the middle is designed to leave the viewer feeling anxious and the end is over quickly and without explanation. The movie left me with a feeling of well- one can only describe it as- emptiness. I was actually quite disappointed I had wasted nearly two hours of my life watching this and whilst I love Jason Statham, he wasn't a central character, but one who I was not fond of by the end. I would strongly recommend people not to watch this unless they like pointless movies with horrible story morals.
I enjoyed the premise. I just enjoyed it better in the original. Sadly this is just another bad film in a sea of bad films. The movie is mildly entertaining up until the near end. Then you get a nice feel good movie buzz from how the movie turns. Then they end it in the most nihilistic manner possible. It aggravated me to the point where I shut the film off and came here to rant.
There are plenty of good films out there within the genre to satisfy any fan of these types of movies. So please pass this one up. Its really not worth your time.
Thanks for reading and I hope I helped sway you from this atrocity.
There are plenty of good films out there within the genre to satisfy any fan of these types of movies. So please pass this one up. Its really not worth your time.
Thanks for reading and I hope I helped sway you from this atrocity.
The plot: Bewildered young man stumbles into a tense game of chance when he impetuously steals a dead man's invitation.
I really liked the original French movie, though I found it to be a little pretentious. The American remake excises all of the art house elements in favor of big name actors, a curiously extended back story for Mickey Rourke's character, and some really bizarre (but awesome) acting from Michael Shannon. The original French version was also a bit more bleak and nihilist, which I think was watered down for American version. Despite this, I've seen several people complain that this movie was too bleak and nihilist! Wow. I guess some people were expecting a traditional, by-the-numbers thriller with car chases and shoot-outs rather than a pensive, darker drama. Unfortunately, a lot of the tension was also streamlined out this version, though I might be misjudging because I already knew the plot. Still, the brutality and nihilism of the original, made all the starker by the black and white stock, really stuck with me, and I didn't feel as though I had quite the same experience when watching the remake.
I'm not one of those snobs who thinks that the original movie is always better than the remake, but, in this case, I think it's true. If I hadn't seen the original and liked it so much, I'd probably rate this a bit higher. Judged on its own merits, I think this is an enjoyable movie, but it doesn't live up to the original. For a movie billed as a thriller, it's lacking the tension that audiences expect, and, as a Jason Statham movie, it's lacking in Jason Statham scenes, which audiences will also expect. Despite my criticism and lukewarm rating, I still liked 13, and I'd probably recommend it to people who haven't seen the original. However, I'd highly recommend you see the original, instead. It's a better movie.
I really liked the original French movie, though I found it to be a little pretentious. The American remake excises all of the art house elements in favor of big name actors, a curiously extended back story for Mickey Rourke's character, and some really bizarre (but awesome) acting from Michael Shannon. The original French version was also a bit more bleak and nihilist, which I think was watered down for American version. Despite this, I've seen several people complain that this movie was too bleak and nihilist! Wow. I guess some people were expecting a traditional, by-the-numbers thriller with car chases and shoot-outs rather than a pensive, darker drama. Unfortunately, a lot of the tension was also streamlined out this version, though I might be misjudging because I already knew the plot. Still, the brutality and nihilism of the original, made all the starker by the black and white stock, really stuck with me, and I didn't feel as though I had quite the same experience when watching the remake.
I'm not one of those snobs who thinks that the original movie is always better than the remake, but, in this case, I think it's true. If I hadn't seen the original and liked it so much, I'd probably rate this a bit higher. Judged on its own merits, I think this is an enjoyable movie, but it doesn't live up to the original. For a movie billed as a thriller, it's lacking the tension that audiences expect, and, as a Jason Statham movie, it's lacking in Jason Statham scenes, which audiences will also expect. Despite my criticism and lukewarm rating, I still liked 13, and I'd probably recommend it to people who haven't seen the original. However, I'd highly recommend you see the original, instead. It's a better movie.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizChuck Zito is a former bodyguard for Mickey Rourke, and also worked as his stunt man for some of the martial arts scenes in Point Blank - Appuntamento con la morte (1998).
- BlooperThe cylinder in a properly functioning revolver will not spin freely once closed. While normally correct, the double-action revolvers used for the competition were owned and distributed by the holder(s) of the competition, and were likely modified for use in the competition. The modification is a simple one, and considering the stakes and as a necessary element of the competition, it is very likely the modification was made. It is obvious during the competition, that the cylinders are, in fact, able to spin when closed, despite common functional design.
- ConnessioniEdited into The Clock (2010)
- Colonne sonoreJUST BUSINESS
Performed by Phil Soussan
Written by Phil Soussan
Courtesy of Blue Cat Tales / ASCAP
Under license from PUSS IN BLUE RECORDS
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is 13?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 20.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 3.701.600 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti