Fool N Final
- 2007
- 2h 24min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,6/10
2437
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA bunch of misfits and gangsters embarks on a journey to find a lost and stolen diamond.A bunch of misfits and gangsters embarks on a journey to find a lost and stolen diamond.A bunch of misfits and gangsters embarks on a journey to find a lost and stolen diamond.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Vivek Oberoi
- Lucky
- (as Vivek Anand Oberoi)
Johny Lever
- Kittu Pilot
- (as Johnny Lever)
Recensioni in evidenza
I have seen a lot of Indian movies which were copied from some real good Hollywood movies. Some though they were copies of Hollywood movies but still worth a watch. Like Kante (a mixture of Usual Suspect, Reservoir Dogs and heat), Musafir (a mixture of Confidence and U-Turn) and a lot of other titles. But this movies which is one of the most pathetic copy of Snatch. Most of these B rated directors they go to a DVD store, watch the movies and translate it in there own language to make a new movie. Well anybody who has not seen this movie i will suggest don't waste your money. If you have seen snatch and liked it you will be really disappointed to watch this. Somebody should inform Guy Richie about this mockery. I definitely believe that most of the actors in this movies have seen Snatch what i can't understand is how do they agree to such a non-sense. Well only one more thing for everybody in bollywood They should try to do some original work cox that's what they are good at. Stop ripping others ideas and embarrassing yourself by making such crap.
When I heard about the movie Fool 'N' Final, I thought it would be a complete comedy, but it turned out to be the complete opposite.
PROBLEMS
1. way too many characters (and it really bothered me the way they put Sameera Reddy in the movie just for eye candy. my mom could have done her role, and she doesn't even speak Hindi)
2. too many plots, and a lot of pointless scenes
3. NOT FUNNY!
The cast of this movie, you could say, are all pretty good actors. I really wish they hadn't wasted their time with this movie AND DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME EITHER!
PROBLEMS
1. way too many characters (and it really bothered me the way they put Sameera Reddy in the movie just for eye candy. my mom could have done her role, and she doesn't even speak Hindi)
2. too many plots, and a lot of pointless scenes
3. NOT FUNNY!
The cast of this movie, you could say, are all pretty good actors. I really wish they hadn't wasted their time with this movie AND DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME EITHER!
Ahmed Khan is a great choreographer. There were some good dances in Fool and Final. Himmesh Reshammia is a great, though a bit annoying, music director and singer. The songs were good and the music was catchy. But apart from this, there wasn't even a single thing that was good in this s**t of a movie.
1) A plethora of disgusting characters including the boy not wanted next door Shahid Kapoor, the horrible, sickly hunk Sunny Deol ( save them, someone!), the bumbling, pathetic Ayesha Takia, who was only good in Dor, the always Punjabi idiot of a father, Om Puri, the wasted Sharmila Tagore, the who-is-she? Sameera Reddy, the no use Sunil Pal, the other wasted Viviek Oberoi ( spelling can be wrong as he keeps changing it all the time for good luck in vain), the same faced, tiring Paresh Rawal, the utterly terrible Cunkey Pandey, the unfunny idiot Johnny Lever and hundreds of other characters.
2) No good story. Story stinks. Script was terrible. No good joked in the film. Not at all innovative in thinking.
3) Why do they have to call Mike Tyson for the film? The idea stinks like rotten tomatoes.
4) Bad starting. Why the emotional twinge in between?
In short, I request even completely addled minds not to visit this crap of a film.
1) A plethora of disgusting characters including the boy not wanted next door Shahid Kapoor, the horrible, sickly hunk Sunny Deol ( save them, someone!), the bumbling, pathetic Ayesha Takia, who was only good in Dor, the always Punjabi idiot of a father, Om Puri, the wasted Sharmila Tagore, the who-is-she? Sameera Reddy, the no use Sunil Pal, the other wasted Viviek Oberoi ( spelling can be wrong as he keeps changing it all the time for good luck in vain), the same faced, tiring Paresh Rawal, the utterly terrible Cunkey Pandey, the unfunny idiot Johnny Lever and hundreds of other characters.
2) No good story. Story stinks. Script was terrible. No good joked in the film. Not at all innovative in thinking.
3) Why do they have to call Mike Tyson for the film? The idea stinks like rotten tomatoes.
4) Bad starting. Why the emotional twinge in between?
In short, I request even completely addled minds not to visit this crap of a film.
Well, the title partly indicates what the film is - foolish! It is completely impractical, has some loose comedy, along with some drama and action. They did manage to get lots of notable actors, but still it's just a circus. For eg., how CAN there be criminals like those found in India in UAE also? Like many of Sunny Deol's films, this also portrays him as an invincible superhero.
Story revolves around a group of small time thieves in Dubai who get involved with some cheap goons who are behind a very expensive diamond.
The only good are FEW comedy scenes, especially on Paresh Rawal's part, and the locations in Dubai. You can gt a good glimpse of the city by watching this film.
Everything else is nonsense- the songs, most of the comedy, the drama..
It's not worth watching really.
Story revolves around a group of small time thieves in Dubai who get involved with some cheap goons who are behind a very expensive diamond.
The only good are FEW comedy scenes, especially on Paresh Rawal's part, and the locations in Dubai. You can gt a good glimpse of the city by watching this film.
Everything else is nonsense- the songs, most of the comedy, the drama..
It's not worth watching really.
"Fool'N'Final" represents the worst in not only Bollywood film history but the history of cinema itself. There are far too many films like this that are made or rather 'remade' in Bollywood without rhyme or reason. There are no saving graces for the film, unlike other remakes that directly rip off the story and give it an 'Indianize' it as American remakes tend to do, this film doesn't which leaves it as an empty and hollow commercial shell. The problem lies within the fact that this film is nothing more than a 'get rich quick' scheme concocted by it's producers, Base Industries Groups which is owned by the Nadiawala's. The film that they ripped off is Guy Ritchie's 2000 Hit "Snatch". One has to scoff at B.I.G.'s mission statement which can be located on the "Hera Phiri" website where they state that they "believe that the fountainhead of film making lies at the confluence of creativity, talent, technology & technique. In the quest for entertainment that appeals to the heart & mind, the entity considers itself as a medium where the flourish of imagination journeys to the senses of the entertained." (which can be located at this address http://www.phirherapheri.in/base.htm. Obviously just like other film producers, what they say has little to do with what they mean.
The film boasts what can be considered a star cast. At the helm is Shahid Kapur and his lady love interest (in a story that is never explored but only hinted at) Ayesha Takia. Their support comes in from Vivek Oberoi, Sunny Deol, Jackie Shroff, Paresh Rawal, Om Puri, Johnny Lever, Gulshan Grover, Arbaaz Khan, Chunky Pandey and Sharmila Tagore. With solid experience like that behind it, you would think that the performances would be at least entertaining, not mind blowing but at least entertaining. But you would be wrong and for this, you can be forgiven. Not one actor manages to entertain. Shahid Kapur is Shahid Kapur which is nothing special because the only reason he is allowed to exist in Bollywood is because millions of teenage girls fawn over him. Ayesha Takia, who managed to spark interest with her role in 'Dor', does nothing with her role leading her to quickly becoming the most un-interesting fairly new talent of the next generation. Oberoi, who at times has almost gleefully recalled his training at NYU continues to spit out roles that incline viewers to believe that he didn't actually learn anything while in training. Deol, Shroff, Puri, Pandy, and Tagore are all wasted in roles that are needed because...well, their roles were in the original and there are character spaces that needed to be filled. However, it is Pandey that gives a stand out performance even though his role is mediocre and pale in comparison to Benicio Del Toro in "Snatch".
Though there are snippets of originality that come in the form of the directorial technique, they are pale in comparison to the quick editing techniques and framing that is used by Ritchie in "Snatch". The film is laid out like a comic strip, however, this wanes quickly when there is no need for it when it starts to become over used.
The writing is uninspired almost as much as the direction is, this is what causes the overall production to suffer. The actors look uninterested and the viewer quickly realizes that the actors are doing this either because their careers have faded away or because they needed a paycheck to sustain their high flying Bollywood lifestyles (which according to interviews consists of sitting at home and listening to their parents).
The soundtrack, which is an integral ingredient in a Bollywood production, is uninspired commercial bird droppings. The picturization of the songs are even worse with actors running around in 'bling' gear pretending to act cool not realizing that a lot of people don't actually by into the 'bling' factor. Oh, and Mike Tyson appears during the end song. Why? Because the producers felt that he could help to sell an appearance that consists of him throwing shadow punches at the camera while inter cutting to the rest of the cast dancing in their 'bling' gear - that and the fact that Tyson needs the money right now.
A waste of space and time.
1/10.
The film boasts what can be considered a star cast. At the helm is Shahid Kapur and his lady love interest (in a story that is never explored but only hinted at) Ayesha Takia. Their support comes in from Vivek Oberoi, Sunny Deol, Jackie Shroff, Paresh Rawal, Om Puri, Johnny Lever, Gulshan Grover, Arbaaz Khan, Chunky Pandey and Sharmila Tagore. With solid experience like that behind it, you would think that the performances would be at least entertaining, not mind blowing but at least entertaining. But you would be wrong and for this, you can be forgiven. Not one actor manages to entertain. Shahid Kapur is Shahid Kapur which is nothing special because the only reason he is allowed to exist in Bollywood is because millions of teenage girls fawn over him. Ayesha Takia, who managed to spark interest with her role in 'Dor', does nothing with her role leading her to quickly becoming the most un-interesting fairly new talent of the next generation. Oberoi, who at times has almost gleefully recalled his training at NYU continues to spit out roles that incline viewers to believe that he didn't actually learn anything while in training. Deol, Shroff, Puri, Pandy, and Tagore are all wasted in roles that are needed because...well, their roles were in the original and there are character spaces that needed to be filled. However, it is Pandey that gives a stand out performance even though his role is mediocre and pale in comparison to Benicio Del Toro in "Snatch".
Though there are snippets of originality that come in the form of the directorial technique, they are pale in comparison to the quick editing techniques and framing that is used by Ritchie in "Snatch". The film is laid out like a comic strip, however, this wanes quickly when there is no need for it when it starts to become over used.
The writing is uninspired almost as much as the direction is, this is what causes the overall production to suffer. The actors look uninterested and the viewer quickly realizes that the actors are doing this either because their careers have faded away or because they needed a paycheck to sustain their high flying Bollywood lifestyles (which according to interviews consists of sitting at home and listening to their parents).
The soundtrack, which is an integral ingredient in a Bollywood production, is uninspired commercial bird droppings. The picturization of the songs are even worse with actors running around in 'bling' gear pretending to act cool not realizing that a lot of people don't actually by into the 'bling' factor. Oh, and Mike Tyson appears during the end song. Why? Because the producers felt that he could help to sell an appearance that consists of him throwing shadow punches at the camera while inter cutting to the rest of the cast dancing in their 'bling' gear - that and the fact that Tyson needs the money right now.
A waste of space and time.
1/10.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFrom 2002-2007 Firoz Nadiadwala made 6 films out of which 5 were loose remakes of Hollywood films like Awara Paagal Deewana based on The Whole Nine Yards, Deewane Huge Paagal based on There's Something About Mary, Phir Hera Pheri inspired by Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, Welcome loosely inspired by Mickey Blue Eyes and Fool N Final based on Snatch.
- BlooperWhen Sunny Deol is punching hands of the wrestler he has a toothpick in one angle and it vanishes in next one.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Fool N Final?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Полный финиш
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 4.242.559 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 2h 24min(144 min)
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti