VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,4/10
1648
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.A doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.A doctor invents a resurrection formula and tests it by killing his assistant over and over and over again.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 1 candidatura in totale
Recensione in evidenza
Full disclosure: Re-Animator is one of my all-time favorite movies. So, Subject Two, about a "doctor" who lives secluded in the mountains of Colorado, and experiments with death and reanimation, with a willing subject to be killed and brought back to life for as many times as he pleases... That's gotta be good, right? Well, not particularly.
Save for possibly "the original" Dr. Vick, I found the acting in this to be pretty sub-par. And even he could've played it up more, he IS a demented, mad doctor, after all. (Oh, a mad doctor does show up... for one embarrassing performance). The "subject" is all too chill, and when things get dramatic, sappy, and/or philosophical, well let's say these 3 subjects are not this actor's strong suit. Does not help the musings on life and death are written poorly.
Subject has side effects, ceases to feel, ponders life outside of the cabin. Toward the beginning of the movie, subject catches a ride with a pretty girl... and asks for her number. They ride that horse for a while, as his sole motivation to get back out into the world. Then he loses the number. Oh well, that's it for him, I guess. They show him aimlessly wandering down the mountain under the closing credits.
Man, I really like a good premise. And they left this movie open-ended on a few fronts. A little ambiguity can be good, too. This could've easily spun off into a sequel, and the twist gives bearing for a prequel. (Of which I'm sure we'll never see).
Save for possibly "the original" Dr. Vick, I found the acting in this to be pretty sub-par. And even he could've played it up more, he IS a demented, mad doctor, after all. (Oh, a mad doctor does show up... for one embarrassing performance). The "subject" is all too chill, and when things get dramatic, sappy, and/or philosophical, well let's say these 3 subjects are not this actor's strong suit. Does not help the musings on life and death are written poorly.
Subject has side effects, ceases to feel, ponders life outside of the cabin. Toward the beginning of the movie, subject catches a ride with a pretty girl... and asks for her number. They ride that horse for a while, as his sole motivation to get back out into the world. Then he loses the number. Oh well, that's it for him, I guess. They show him aimlessly wandering down the mountain under the closing credits.
Man, I really like a good premise. And they left this movie open-ended on a few fronts. A little ambiguity can be good, too. This could've easily spun off into a sequel, and the twist gives bearing for a prequel. (Of which I'm sure we'll never see).
- selfdestructo
- 7 apr 2022
- Permalink
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOfficial Selection 2006 Sundance Film Festival.
- BlooperWhen "Subject Two" first arrives at Doc's cabin, there is just a bit of snow on his shoulders. When he starts to talk to the doctor in the cabin, there is a lot of snow on his right shoulder. After the second time the camera switches back to the doctor, the snow is completely gone.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 23.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Subject Two (2006) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi