VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,2/10
33.976
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Astérix e Obélix partecipano alle Olimpiadi per aiutare il loro amico Alafolix a sposare la principessa Irina. Brutus cerca anche di vincere la partita con la sua squadra e sbarazzarsi di su... Leggi tuttoAstérix e Obélix partecipano alle Olimpiadi per aiutare il loro amico Alafolix a sposare la principessa Irina. Brutus cerca anche di vincere la partita con la sua squadra e sbarazzarsi di suo padre Giulio Cesare.Astérix e Obélix partecipano alle Olimpiadi per aiutare il loro amico Alafolix a sposare la principessa Irina. Brutus cerca anche di vincere la partita con la sua squadra e sbarazzarsi di suo padre Giulio Cesare.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Michael Herbig
- Pasunmotdeplus
- (as Michael Bully Herbig)
Jérôme Le Banner
- Claudius Cornedurus
- (as Jerôme Le Banner)
Recensioni in evidenza
I used to read the adventures of Asterix when I was younger, and I was always delighted. But, watching this movie made me think differently: has the little 'Gaullois' village given up? the movie seems only made to guarantee commercial success: many famous people (many of whom are known only in France, plus some guest stars), special effects, big marketing, etc... But, in the end, the jokes are not very good, the special effects are sometime ridiculous, the plot is far fetched and the frequent appearance of guest stars doesn't manage to fill this rather empty movie (in fact, it ended getting on my nerves).
I don't know if children will find this movie funny, but it's really difficult for anybody without 'laughing potion' to take real pleasure here. Too bad for Benoit Poolevoerde, who has done his best to save the Titanicus!
I don't know if children will find this movie funny, but it's really difficult for anybody without 'laughing potion' to take real pleasure here. Too bad for Benoit Poolevoerde, who has done his best to save the Titanicus!
The first one looked good but just could not get the humor right. The second one was quite good; close to the sense of humor of Gosciny (and Uderzo as well). So I was hoping for something good. Now the third one is kind of terrible. The visuals are okay (yes you see the CGI but it's not a problem in a funny movie based on comics) but almost everything else... The humor is worse than in the first one, the movie is just too long, the cameo-filled last ten minutes seem to be shot only for the end credits (they just don't make sense in the movie) but somebody must have thought they are funny enough for the movie - they are not. There are strange parts meant to be funny (e.g. the laser sword you could see in the advertisements - if they had to include a star wars joke again then why not make it at least a bit funny?), even the time between intended (forced and overplayed) gags is too long. Alain Delon is moderately funny as Caesar but his part is also overplayed, overly long. The new actor playing Asterix is a, as high as Obelix... b, never as funny/witty-looking as Christian Clavier. So what could go wrong did go wrong with this movie; maybe children will enjoy it but probably it will be too long for them as well.
No, it's not *good*, I won't go that far. When you think of what it *could* have been, you feel cheated. The remarks listed in reviews stand: the focus isn't always there, the supposedly main character was relegated to being mere support, the pacing is often off - for example, the chariot race manages to look way less exciting than it should be, so one can speculate where the fault lies - the camera-work, the editing... I think it's the direction. The director(s) and the producer(s) went to create a film for about a bazillion types of audiences (and I don't blame them, when there are 70+ million Euros to justify and return) but that's a pretty tough goal. It worked for the original comic where the kids get the gags and the subtle education, and the adults get the clever wordplay and densely packed historical, literary, and other references, but this doesn't mean it will necessarily work in another medium. So there are too many plots (patched together from several Astérix books - this was the demise of the first film too, so future takers, learn!), too many people to satisfy, and too many actors and celebrities. To hold all those egos in check one needs a stronger director or team than the newbies (sorry, but it's true) this film had. I have the impression that they went with the idea that if they throw enough money and enough famous names into the cauldron the film will make itself, but, eh, no. This film desperately needed somebody who could shape it better because it's obvious where things were cut (some scenes make no sense) and they should have used the *titular character* a lot more. It must be said however that for an amusing night's out it's a perfectly fine piece of entertainment. We laughed quite a lot. Depardieu and Delon deliver, Poelvoorde is a comedian I'd not heard of before but now I'm interested in his other work, and as for the new Astérix - Clovis Cornillac - well, he got the character down to a T: he's too tall and a little too fit, sure, but he looks pretty darn much like the guy in the comic book and he moves and talks just like him. I'd never seen a fictional character recreated with such essential accuracy and since this must be even more difficult when the source material is based on grotesque and exaggeration, this is quite an achievement. Hopefully, Mr Cornillac will have (and accept) another chance to play in an Astérix film, this time with a bigger role.
This is my first encounter with M. Depardieu as Obelix. I wasn't expecting much: French cinema has a habit on making poor nepotistic films on a regular basis (i.e. members of the typical film family keep scratching each other's back in circles...)
Asterix is both a French institution that has always been written to be understood at several levels by different age groups. The film is good in the sense that it doesn't try to replicate the book, it expands on it but still tries to capture this multi=layered humour. It's not always subtle but it works. A few examples:
I also found that the special effects were used to carry humour and a cartoon-like spirit as opposed to being grandiose.
In summary 'The Third Man it ain't, but as thoroughly entertaining family film for all ages, it just works.
Asterix is both a French institution that has always been written to be understood at several levels by different age groups. The film is good in the sense that it doesn't try to replicate the book, it expands on it but still tries to capture this multi=layered humour. It's not always subtle but it works. A few examples:
- Alain Delon makes an impressive comeback while sending himself up and referencing the films that made his past glory
- Depardieu re-enacts scenes from his marvellous Cyrano, using virtually the same shots and lighting almost 20 years on
- The modernised Ben Hur chariot race is absolutely right for today's audience and manages to capture the spirit of the book while being much more sophisticated.
- The multiple cameos are very funny, especially if you can pick up some of the French dialogues. Others will simply be impressed by who appears on screen...
I also found that the special effects were used to carry humour and a cartoon-like spirit as opposed to being grandiose.
In summary 'The Third Man it ain't, but as thoroughly entertaining family film for all ages, it just works.
The movie has some very good parts, but unfortunately, it has more boring parts. It's big, and it made me wanna fall asleep a lot of times.. If they had cut all he stupid, with no reason, long parts, this would have been a great movie. I know that ASTERIX had always been a great comic. And it's a good reason to made me wanna see the movie. I expected something better for the movie, and so will you. The actors who play Astérix and Panroamix(druid) are different from the last two Astérix movies, and they are terrible. The don't feel like the original Astérix actors, but more like some random actors they picked up, and dressed in the right clothes. The humor is boring, because it's the same stupid "funny" thing all the time. It was pretty funny when Numérobis acted stupid at "Astérix & Obélix: Mission Cléopâtre", but at this movie it's not.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie has a lot of cameos from sports celebrities: Michael Schumacher (Formula One racing). Amélie Mauresmo (Tennis) and Tony Parker (Basketball). Zinédine Zidane, the French football superstar, replaced David Beckham, who initially was supposed to appear in the movie. The part of Roman athlete Claudius Cornedurus (Gluteus Maximus), played by Jérôme Le Banner, was originally to be played by Jean-Claude Van Damme.
- BlooperSpeaking of Brutus, Cesar mentions the seven plagues of Egypt. There were ten plagues.
- Citazioni
Assurancetourix: Has anyone ever sung in a stadium?
Obélix: Yes, the Rolling Menhirs.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Troldspejlet: Episodio #38.5 (2008)
- Colonne sonoreAll We Need
Performed by DJ Abdel, Big Ali and Loïs Andréa
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Asterix at the Olympic Games?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Asterix at the Olympic Games
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Desierto de Tabernas, Almería, Andalucía, Spagna(Brutus' dream)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 78.000.000 € (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 131.856.927 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 56 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Japanese language plot outline for Asterix alle Olimpiadi (2008)?
Rispondi