Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaIn this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.In this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.In this horrifying, modern retelling of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, a neurosurgeon, obsessed with the reanimation of dead flesh, murders his patients and resurrects the corpse.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
Thomas Downey
- Dr. Robert Walton
- (as Tom Downey)
Joel Ezra Hebner
- The Creature
- (as Joel Hebner)
- …
Dan Kaplan
- Detective Ferrati
- (as Dan Tana)
Tim Travers
- Detective Nimby
- (as Timothy Travers)
Monique Jones
- Susie
- (as Alison Johnston)
Kandis Fay
- Mez
- (as Kandis Erickson)
Recensioni in evidenza
You think you've seen it, Then they re-invent Mary Shelley's Monster Wheel. I should start with the cast: RHETT GILES as Victor Franks/The Doctor, He has this Alan Rickman-Snape from Harry Potter twist. JOEL HEBNER (Need to interview) plays the reborn creature,I can't exactly say as Bernie Wrightson would draw him---But, Close. The editing was challenging to watch at first, Kind of like "Memento". A lot of scenes will make you feel all squishy for tributes- There is the Babysitter scene from first "Halloween", The interrogation moment from "Silence Of The Lambs", I loved the "Kolchak" moment the shrink had with a microphone at end. This would have been a Great Ending, Not the teaser throwaway that smacks sequel
Very bad acting. This time i could not even laugh at the bad acting as it can be in other horrors sometimes , for some reason i felt sorry for the actors in this case. I also wish Rhett Giles (Victor) could speak more naturally , less drama in his nonstop half whispering voice maybe.
The characters was not interesting ,or believable in any way and i could not care less how the story will develop either . And what is it with the sound , that was really irritating. The sound is changing constantly between to quiet , so you can hardly hear it and very laud , so you can hardly manage to continue watch .
I did not.
The characters was not interesting ,or believable in any way and i could not care less how the story will develop either . And what is it with the sound , that was really irritating. The sound is changing constantly between to quiet , so you can hardly hear it and very laud , so you can hardly manage to continue watch .
I did not.
This modern retelling of Mary Shelleys classic Frankenstein is brought to you by The Asylum, do I really need to continue?
Asylum is infamous for making bad movies and "Mockbusters" and here we have one of three connected movies by them where it appears they were trying to create a monster universe. First came this then Beast of Bray Road (2005) and then Dracula's Curse (2006) so we have Frankenstein, Dracula and the Wolfman on display.
For some reason they have much of the same cast yet playing different characters which seems like a poor choice. Then again it's The Asylum so I shouldn't be surprised.
Again it's a very loose modern adaptation, certain elements will look familiar but ultimately it forges it's own identity and that's more than slightly a bad thing. Frankenstein Reborn ticks all the usual Asylum boxes, yet is actually a bit better than usual somehow.
The creature looks better than you'd imagine, and the plot is passable. Sadly that's where it ends, the acting is appalling, the pacing is bizarre and the whole thing just doesn't flow.
Passable for an Asylum film, still bad compared to everything else.
The Good:
The monster looks okay
The Bad:
Victor "Frank", really?
A few plot holes
Poorly constructed
Sarah Lieving is wasted
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
It's like the Asylum is making one of every movie just so they can prove they can't make anything successfully
Australian-American-Italian-Swiss Victor Frank who graduated from Harvard just didn't sit right with me
Asylum is infamous for making bad movies and "Mockbusters" and here we have one of three connected movies by them where it appears they were trying to create a monster universe. First came this then Beast of Bray Road (2005) and then Dracula's Curse (2006) so we have Frankenstein, Dracula and the Wolfman on display.
For some reason they have much of the same cast yet playing different characters which seems like a poor choice. Then again it's The Asylum so I shouldn't be surprised.
Again it's a very loose modern adaptation, certain elements will look familiar but ultimately it forges it's own identity and that's more than slightly a bad thing. Frankenstein Reborn ticks all the usual Asylum boxes, yet is actually a bit better than usual somehow.
The creature looks better than you'd imagine, and the plot is passable. Sadly that's where it ends, the acting is appalling, the pacing is bizarre and the whole thing just doesn't flow.
Passable for an Asylum film, still bad compared to everything else.
The Good:
The monster looks okay
The Bad:
Victor "Frank", really?
A few plot holes
Poorly constructed
Sarah Lieving is wasted
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
It's like the Asylum is making one of every movie just so they can prove they can't make anything successfully
Australian-American-Italian-Swiss Victor Frank who graduated from Harvard just didn't sit right with me
Where to begin? First off, most of the film is flashbacks. Second, the beginning was stupid, and third, a lot of boring dialog and bad actors. The monster is quite disturbing and so is his roar. They had small parts like when a woman is shown for 2 minutes and is killed. There was parts when i felt like turning it off but I had nothing else to do. After the credits end, there is a minute of the screen pitch black and the music still going. I bet it was to make the movie a minute longer. I gave it a 3, because I like b-horror films,i like Frankenstein movies and you have to give Leigh some credit. My recommendation: if you see it at the video store, tell a person working there that it is a waste of money for you to rent that. So stay away as far as possible. Don't say I didn't warn you.
when i see a movie review with such polarized opinion, i want to give it a chance. i bought this as a previously viewed DVD from a national video rental chain and only paid $5. not worth the $5. all the bad has been said already.
the acting is about on the par of a softcore film on cinemax. bleh. the only thing i liked about it (maybe didn't dislike is more appropriate) is that the actresses in this movie are pleasing to look at.
i didn't think i would be getting a great movie here and biy was i right. the worst movie i have seen a quite sometime.
this one's going in the garage sale pile.
the acting is about on the par of a softcore film on cinemax. bleh. the only thing i liked about it (maybe didn't dislike is more appropriate) is that the actresses in this movie are pleasing to look at.
i didn't think i would be getting a great movie here and biy was i right. the worst movie i have seen a quite sometime.
this one's going in the garage sale pile.
Lo sapevi?
- Curiosità sui crediti"The events, characters, and firms depicted in this photoplay are fictitious. Really. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental, and very weird. We suggest moving, and/or staying away from labs run by psychos."
- ConnessioniFollowed by The Beast of Bray Road (2005)
- Colonne sonoreSweet Intoxication
Written and Performed by Eliza Swenson
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 500.000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Frankenstein Reborn (2005) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi