Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA group of friends are pursued by a sinister force after rescuing an abandoned child.A group of friends are pursued by a sinister force after rescuing an abandoned child.A group of friends are pursued by a sinister force after rescuing an abandoned child.
Recensioni in evidenza
I really enjoyed this. Thought the actors were very naturalistic and pulled off their roles very well. This meant I stuck with the film to the end because I wanted to know the outcome. There were bad points - SFX should have been concealed by the dark more and it was too formulaic. Bold effort though and I expected to see a higher average, but there is some cheapness to be looked through. But in its own right, I was happy to watch and didn't find any slack. The actual horror was low because of this, but the tension was there. I've scored it high because I enjoyed it and wanted to see the end, whereas many glossier films I find myself just hoping that they will end.
An attempt at what? I have no idea, but there's potential here. It's squandered pretty badly on a weak script and a terribly-realised monster.
The story itself has a lot of potential - a young (teen?) mother who gives up her baby for adoption later goes on a camping trip with friends and a preacher, and finds an abandoned baby. The friends are then all terrorised by a bear monster thing, kind of like the bear from Annihilation if it was imagined by early Doctor Who creature designers. A fitting comparison, really, considering the preacher is played by Peter Capaldi - the 12th actor to portray The Doctor.
The kids do an admirable job, really, and deliver their dialogue pretty well, and Capaldi is...watchable? I guess? I mean, he barely has any screen time, really, so it's hard to say...
The real 'star', though, is the monster...which is really badly realised. If they'd put in more effort with that, it probably would have elevated this movie by quite a bit.
The story itself has a lot of potential - a young (teen?) mother who gives up her baby for adoption later goes on a camping trip with friends and a preacher, and finds an abandoned baby. The friends are then all terrorised by a bear monster thing, kind of like the bear from Annihilation if it was imagined by early Doctor Who creature designers. A fitting comparison, really, considering the preacher is played by Peter Capaldi - the 12th actor to portray The Doctor.
The kids do an admirable job, really, and deliver their dialogue pretty well, and Capaldi is...watchable? I guess? I mean, he barely has any screen time, really, so it's hard to say...
The real 'star', though, is the monster...which is really badly realised. If they'd put in more effort with that, it probably would have elevated this movie by quite a bit.
I went to see wild country just over a week and a half ago and i must say i quite enjoyed it. its understandable that they couldn't do everything they wanted to do with the film considering the small budget of i think it was around about 1 million which is not a lot for a feature film. But apart from the kind of Ropey special effects and the pretty bad ending the movie as a whole was really good, with strong performances from Samantha Shields who was very realistic threw out the film unlike some of the other performances in the movie. Another person who really stood out in the film was the young Jamie Quinn who played the part of Mark, who at the start of the film came out with a few great one liners towards his brother and the two girls and made the part Mark a very believable character and shows that his career will not end with one feature film. Over all Wild Country is a very enjoyable and is a must see for all Scottish cinema lovers.
Barrie.
Barrie.
I am slightly biased in non-favor of this movie having actually seen it. Though it shows potential to have something vaguely resembling a plot, in the end, the viewer is left wondering whether or not the movie has actually started. Time was not an issue for lacking plot. Running at only 72 minutes, there was more than enough time to actually explain SOMETHING. Please explain something. That is why you make movies. The main character, Kelly Ann, could have been played by anyone with a Scotish accent and legs capable of running through random fields in Scotland for extended periods of time. Lee could be played by any semi- to moderately-attractive young male with a Scotish accent as well. Only running in his case was not a requirement. Much of this movie took place during the day time, which made the "wolf" one of the greatest comedic characters I have ever witnessed. And when I say "wolf" what I am trying to say is a half-boar, half mad cow fetus half-breed of UK craziness. (See 'Isolation' for reference and if you want to see a decent horror film from the UK.)
I enjoyed this a lot more than expected, even though the special effects weren't great. I liked how the story was full of little surprises. Like when the priest played by Peter Capaldi, tells a local folk tale about cannibals. That's what I expected. Then it was a creature featue. Other surprises pop up too.
The acting was great too, and I really bought into all the characters. I also really appreciated that none of the characters acted dumb to forward the plot. They understandbly act like teenagers, but they're obviously doing their best in the situation they're in.
They want to stick together, but when the first character is picked off from the group by the creature. They pick up quickly that's what the creature was trying to do.
There's also lighter funnier moments in the film as well, and I thought it was obviously made with a lot of passion.
The acting was great too, and I really bought into all the characters. I also really appreciated that none of the characters acted dumb to forward the plot. They understandbly act like teenagers, but they're obviously doing their best in the situation they're in.
They want to stick together, but when the first character is picked off from the group by the creature. They pick up quickly that's what the creature was trying to do.
There's also lighter funnier moments in the film as well, and I thought it was obviously made with a lot of passion.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe werewolves in the movie were designed by Bob Keen of Image FX. The same team who created the werewolves in Dog Soldiers (2002) which is also set in the Scottish highlands but was not filmed in Scotland.
- ConnessioniReferences Mr. Bean (1990)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1.000.000 £ (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 7 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Wild Country (2005) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi