Hardcore

i saw hardcore yesterday,and i think it was great.the acting was very good even though most of the actors are still in drama schools and they havent been in a film before , they acted like professionals.particularly danae skiadi got perfectly in the skin of her part,her facial expressions,her movements and her "evil"smile worked very well.katerina tsavalou was also good,although sometimes the flat tone of her voice was kind of irritating but then i realised that it had to be like that since she was 17 and a half and already tired of her life,tired of being a teenage whore and not having anyone to love her and not just take advantage of her and also because she wasnt as tough as nadia was.i dont know if i would have liked hardcore that much if it was a hollywood film.i'm sure that it would have been completely different.they would have given more importance to martha's "need love and family" and it would be full of hugging,touching scenes with lines like:i'm sick of this life i want to be loved ,i want a family "and it would probably show why they left their houses in the fist place,probably because their parents were divorced and dad didnt pay enough attention to them...the classical hollywood themes and it would end up being boring.

Fun and games it's not, a great movie it is. It's masterfully directed it oozes creativity, it's touching and hard at the same time, it hasn't got a boring moment, it was snubbed by critics, it's in one word brilliant. Dennis Iliadis paints a picture of wasted youth but the movie is much more than a cautionary tale. It is a film about longing, about the need to feel at home, the need of a family. The movie's young protagonists may seem as lost cases to some, but they are no different than you and me. They may sell their bodies they may kill for fun and money, but, hey, we all do what we have to do... Try to see this movie. it's worth your admission money(and then some)!

Saw this movie at the int. film-festival of Gent. First of all : this movie is not for people who are easily chocked.

Through the eyes of two young prostitutes named Nadia & Martha (who start a lesbian relationship) we are sucked into a dark world of sex, drugs and violence... but not without content ! The film is about jealousy, the need for a home and family (especially in Martha's case) but above all how hard it is to get out this kind of underground scene. During their relationship Nadia turns out more and more ambitious and manipulative what finally lead to manipulation and even murder. The story started rather slow but the ended very strong.

The movie is best described as an urban fairytale of love and betrayal.

Title says it all. This movie seems to be a flat off rip off of one of my favourite movies Lilya 4 Ever. I wouldn't mind that, but the core difference between the two movies are this: This movie is incredibly unrealistic, and our main characters aren't likeable. In Lilya4Ever, everything that happens, can easily happen in real life. Here, most stuff that happen, are unreal.

Considering this director also copied Wes Craven's movie, Last House on the Left, i am not suprised. What ruins this movie is the logic. I do not mind the plot, the plot was okay. The acting kinda seem wooden at times, but it's kinda okay, and the camera work kinda seems low.

As mentioned, this movie does not make a lot of logic. We start pretty strong, and then after 20-30 minutes, the movie gets really dull and boring. So our main character kills her boyfriend and a nameless man so she could get fame, and she does and she becomes a model? What logic does that make lol? You can say oh it's just a movie. Yeah, but this movie was trying to go for realism, and it did, and then it just decided no lets just make this movie completely unrealistic.

Another thing that really breaks this movie is the fact that our main character, Nandia, she is unlikeable as heck. She comes off as this miss perfect, that wants everything to be how she wants it to be. We are supposed to see her as a VICTIM, and she also said she set her parents on fire. And that's our victim? Where's the logic behind the writing of this movie?

There isn't any other character that has any depth except Martha and Nandia, which is okay, but i just failed to care for either of them, since Nandia comes as extremely unlikeable, while Martha has the personality of a toothpick.

Ultimately, no. Just watch the original Lilya 4 Ever. Or, there's also other movies that do the same subject matter much better like 3096 Days, Christiane F and Your Name Was Justine, every movie i just mentioned is way superior then this.

What also puzzles me is, how did Argyris get ahold of a pistol? He just said he got it. We never got an explaination on how he did so. This movie has so many holes i just listed a few, there's probably more 10 holes you can dug out from this. Also this movie is edited in a way that it goes upside down, it's not going normally like a normal story. No, they edited this in a way that it's so jammed together.

Seeing Hardcore, many would mistake it for a somewhat ripoff (or homeage) of Quentin Tarantino's films. But it's not. Based on a Greek book, Hardcore brings the life and times of two girls, which adventures start from the gutter and move through a journey to success, with a price.

Dennis Iliadis succeeds into what other directors couldn't do in the so called "new Greek cinema" wave.His film captivates the attention of the audience, along with the two actresses who can really act, given the fact that the film does contain nude sequences.

It's a perfect mixture of guns, drugs, sex and violence, a trip through corruption and redemption. The film is a little more lengthy though, and it seems that there are two films combined.