Girls in Love

I saw this show, and I have read all 4 books and I think that they are totally unfaithful. Ellie is not supposed to be a red head, she is supposed to be a brunette with glasses who is quite plump, I feel that I could play Ellie because I feel that I relate to her more. Lets hope they will sort this out and not choose people who are 19 and 16 to be playing years 9s, and Magda is totally different.

Girls in love is a brilliant way to spend half hour, however, I have to admit that it is extremely irritating that the details in the program aren't similar to those of the book series. Also, when I first saw girls in love, I thought that the girls were in like yr 10 or 11 and I was amazed that they were supposed to be in year 9 and 13. I, being in year 9, know that these girls act much older than a year 9 girl. However, the series is easy to relate to and does portray most of the problems that a teenage girl has to face. Its also a laugh and a great series to watch and I am very much looking forward to the second lot of episodes. However, there is another point, why get a boy who looks 15 to play a 17 year old? I am talking about Russell, the actor does not look like he's playing a 17 year old. Oh well, apart from those points, its a great show!

I totally agree with Kate - Girls In Love is nothing like the books! I've got all the books at home and Ellie is meant to be plump, bespectacled girl with frizzy brown hair. How come other programmes and films that are adapted from books do try to find actors and actresses that fit the characters, but on this particular Jacqueline Wilson book, they get it wrong! Harry Potter, for example, the characters look similar to how the characters are described in the books. Also, I'm not racist 'cause I'm black myself, but in the books, Magda's supposed to be a blonde-haired white girl! I'm VERY sure they couldn't change the race of a character in another book, like the Harry Potter books just because the casting director wants to! The story lines in the series are different too. I much prefer The Story of Tracy Beaker, The Illustrated Mum and the recent Best Friends, all of which are true to Jacqueline's books. Anyway, all that said, the series is still very enjoyable, as long as you cast a blind eye on the irregularities in the series and don't expect it to be just like the books.

Hi. I think that the film/ TV series was great if you hadn't read the books. I know they were different to the books and I was also disappointed at the way they were portrayed, although if you hadn't read the books you wouldn't know this and it wouldn't be a problem. The books were better than the film and I agree that the actors looked too old although they were only supposed to be 13. The actress who played Ellie was 17 at the time. Also (and this is a problem with not only the film but also the books) some of the things what happened where not appropriate for the age that the characters where supposed to be. I would just also like to add that I was in this film :-) It was only a small role; however I played the part of the 10year old Ellie. Katie Howseman

yrs 9's are not babies I'm in yr 9!! Some girls in this year do actually act like this. i cant believe the producers or whoever casted the show hired 16-20yr olds to play 13-14 yr olds!! and to the comment above the show cannot be exactly like the book, you cant hire actors/actresses that match the descriptions in the book exactly. Adam Paul Harvey now stars in an ITV drama called "where he heart is" and only looks 16, i cant believe he is 20!! I wonder what olivia (ellie), zaraah (magda) and nadine (amy) will be doing in a couple years time, i don't think they'll still be in this show, i hope they produce another show based on another one of jacqueline wilsons great books!! x