The Ghost Club

all of the critics need to remember that it's a kid's movie. kids starred in the movie. can you really expect that much? it's not supposed to be very in depth, plot twisting, or cause too much thinking. and it was obviously low budget, but well done for the price. it's almost like British children's panto. humorous because of the bad acting. it's definitely not on the par of, let's say, a mary kate and ashley olsen production, but i think the effort put into it definitely came across. there's enough to keep the audience entertained, and for a local project it was definitely good for the whole community that got involved. i think those that think this is the worst film ever made need to see "angry red planet."

I just rented this for my children from TWC's OnDemand. I couldn't finish watching it and I don't even think my 6-year-old will make it to the end. Frankly, we're all mad because we were charged $3.95, the same price as a new movie. This movie is lame in EVERY cinematic category. Nothing personal to the child actors. Your criticized performance is not your fault. That's why you have a director. Unfortunately, the director did not have a director. I just rented this for my children from TWC's OnDemand. I couldn't finish watching it and I don't even think my 6-year-old will make it to the end. Frankly, we're all mad because we were charged $3.95, the same price as a new movie. This movie is lame in EVERY cinematic category. Nothing personal to the child actors. Your criticized performance is not your fault. That's why you have a director. Unfortunately, the director did not have a director.

Give these kids a break! I thought the two girls and the red headed boy did a very good job. There were some weaker performers within the movie, but it does not diminish the quality of their performances. It was refreshing not to have to worry about language or sexual situations in a kids' movie. There were a lot of diversions which could muddy the plot for small kids, and I thought the style of the director kept the kids a little "too organized," ie, kids tend to run not walk when they are excited and rarely stand in perfect lines. Overall, it was refreshing to see a movie without special effects in which the kids actually thought about someone other than themselves and were able to work together as friends.

This movie had a very good base, but the acting was horrendous, and horrible! This is the worst acting that I have ever seen! Except for the adults, they were pretty good. For this movie if they got better actors and actresses this movie would be an excellent movie! Whenever something scary happened all of the actors and actresses wouldn't even act scared they would just run, they would also scream but it definitely wasn't real! I am definitely not seeing this movie ever again! No wonder I have never heard of any of these actors and actresses, for most of them this was the first and probably only thing they have ever done, and I can most definitely tell why! I most definitely do not recommend this movie for any age groups!

On the surface this has lots of weak acting by the kids, a particular verbal style, and I like the review that suggests that being tolerant is worth it, that these are just kids after all.

These days there is a rather high standard in the quality of stories on film, but most of the best include flaws. Including deliberate flaws. The 'weak acting' is glaring, more than is often the case, but look the other way there is a story and, cringe of cringes, I wonder if the weak acting is actually a built in part of the story. To guess that I look to the final scene when ghost catcher is definitely wearing a bra. It seemed likely before but here the broad strap around her back stands out under her top. Also, the ham verbal style is gone. That disappeared after the ghost showed catcher an object that catcher needed.

As a double check, if one looks to other features that the ghost catcher, Brittany Robertson, has had a part, small roles in Jesse Stone, Night Passage (2006) and Keeping Up With The Steins (2006), there is varied styles of acting of solid quality.

To like this I needed to be able to shrug off the flaws. If the ham is deliberate I would prefer otherwise in this case. I still found it practical to get to like this.

I assume that the very young might like this story and to them the flaws might not be blatant, more the way that stories for the very, very young sometimes are?

Those who are returning to childhood. Those who have been sunk to the level of ghost might find Ghost Club to be easy to work to like. If not seen too often.

Others, well it is called the The Ghost Club, after all. This does not have the popularity rating of an animal's shrieking shack.

Further, what the story is, I am not so sure that is a relevant issue. What counts is other. There has been an adventure that entailed spy and inventor and younger brother and occasionally older brother joining ghost catcher to save her family, with the help of someone long dead. Ghost catcher grows in a rather nice and well rounded way and that is what counts.

*

From a different angle. If I take the story seriously it makes for an interesting comparison with My Girl (1991). That has Vada facing a disastrous rite of passage that leads to her wearing a symbolic bra. It has a much wider appeal than the Ghost Club will ever have. My Girl is not a story for the youngest, though.