Lichter

Saw it first when I was about 19 - left me in daze for several days. Rewatched with my husband 5 years later - similar effect. This movie just came into my mind today - you bet I am going to watch it for the third time, 14 years later. Curious what it will do for me this time.

This episode film draws quite a realistic picture on life on both sides of the German-Polish border. To the group of Ukrainian, stranded at the polish side of river Oder, the lights of the German town of Frankfurt/Oder promise a new life, wealth and freedom in the West. And nearly impossible to reach, as they cannot hope for asylum there. But life on the other side is also not as easy as it seems. We meet Ingo, who tries to make some money building up a mattress store and fails miserably; Katharina who has fled from the children's home and now makes her living of smuggling cigarettes over the border. On the other side of the river, there's the polish father who tries almost everything to get together the money for his daughter's communion dress; student Beata who works as a translator and also fulfills the more special wishes of her customers, as long as she gets paid. During the film, some of these people's ways cross, some don't, some try to help the others, some betray them, everyone struggles to make the best out of it for himself whether he or she is Polish, German or Ukrainian. One other thing struck my mind: In one scene of the film, Beata meets her German ex-boyfriend; when they start arguing, she shouts at him in Polish. He doesn't understand her and tells her to speak German and she answers: "If you had really loved me, you'd have learned Polish a long time ago!" He just says: "You can't be serious." I found this exemplary for many of the people, especially the Germans, that they don't understand the others, and they don't want to try. The people on the other side of the border, or those connected to it like German-Ukrainian translator Sonya, seem to help each other more, even though they also try to make their own profit by it, sometimes. Maybe this is the difference between the two worlds on the two sides of the river.

It is a slap in the face of all these rich, satisfied, egoistic, first world societies, who think that they are great, know better, and have more rights to live and spend than the poor on the other side of the fence.

We (some students, theatre people etc.) also tried recently to make a realistic feature, in our present times, shot on mini-DV, but this LICHTER is much, much better! I admire its realism, and how it could touch me within very few minutes, holding its tension for the whole time, and really caring for its characters. Believe me, I watch quite a lot of movies, but this does not happen very often.

It is a very sad observation of our economic situation, and the pressure which it forces on normal, small, everyday people. The need to make a living destroys their pride, their hopes, their humanity - and all this happens not far from the "Lights" ("Lichter") of the rich, promised land of wealth, where I live (I am blessed to live here) which is only a small distance away. Only a river to cross, but in fact the distance from poor to rich is nearly impossible to cross.

If you know "Lamerica" from Gianni Amelio or "Dekalog" aka "The Ten commandments" by Krzystof Kieslowski: "Lichter" has some similarities.

Lichter is situated on both sides of the German-Polish border. It portrays several citizens of both the German and the Polish side of the border and some illegal immigrants hoping to cross the border to the Promised Land. Several story lines are set up, but only some meet. After all stories are set up, some characters act out of love for someone, even make a brave and important decision to help someone in need. All are betrayed, so this makes a pretty depressing picture with little hope and redemption. Even the building project as a sign of hope and cooperation turns out to have a negative angle.

From a cinema-point of view it would have been a better idea to connect all story lines and I found that a missed opportunity. But it succeeds in balancing the motives of all characters: Some act out of selfishness, some out of love, and others out of survival. At one moment in the movie immigrants are called fortune seekers, later they are called people in need.

Hans-Christian Schmid's direction is average. This is made for little money and it shows. It looks a bit like an upgraded TV-movie, with relative few interesting camera shots. But my guess is he wants us to focus on the theme of the movie and he succeeds in that, because after a few minutes you stop thinking about the movie's obvious technical limitations.

The tag line of the movie is Welcome to reality. But as cinema is all about manipulation this is a strange one. Every filmmaker has to start by making a choice where to place his or her movie in the movie universe, somewhere between the real world and the imagined world where a movie interacts with our imagination. So this is as manipulated as would be the reverse: Show a border town where everybody's happy. Show happy immigrants working happily on beautiful Berlin building projects. So here we still watch an imagined world being thoroughly manipulated by the director. And this certainly hasn't the realism of post-war Italian cinema.

As for the real world: With Poland now a member of the EU, the movie is already somewhat out of date and Poland will within a few years reach the wealth of say the Portuguese. Illegal immigration will always exist and has always existed: People seeking asylum, people wanting a better existence. The whole debate in Europe is about where to draw lines. This gives some reflection on that process.

The acting was good, and the story kind of interesting.

I don´t think it is an important film, but it gives you something to think about. To think about human behaviour etc.

To be a really good film I missed a lot of explanations. For example why the family wanted to leave the Ukraine. Why they took a little baby with them? I wouldn`t make such a dangerous journey with a baby if it wouldn`t be really necessary. So the story about the Ukrainians didn`t work for me.

6/10.