[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
IMDbPro

Pure Rage: The Making of '28 Days Later'

  • Cortometraggio per la TV
  • 2002
  • 20min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,1/10
292
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Cillian Murphy in 28 giorni dopo (2002)
DocumentaryShort

Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaDocumentary about the making of Danny Boyle's end-of-the-world style horror movie, 28 Days Later.Documentary about the making of Danny Boyle's end-of-the-world style horror movie, 28 Days Later.Documentary about the making of Danny Boyle's end-of-the-world style horror movie, 28 Days Later.

  • Regia
    • Toby James
  • Star
    • Lisa I'Anson
    • Andy Coghlan
    • Brian Duerden
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    6,1/10
    292
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    • Regia
      • Toby James
    • Star
      • Lisa I'Anson
      • Andy Coghlan
      • Brian Duerden
    • 9Recensioni degli utenti
    • 1Recensione della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Foto

    Interpreti principali15

    Modifica
    Lisa I'Anson
    Lisa I'Anson
    • Narrator
    • (voce)
    Andy Coghlan
    • Self - reporter, New Scientist Magazine
    Brian Duerden
    • Self - professor, Public Health & Leisure Support
    Naomie Harris
    Naomie Harris
    • Self
    Danny Boyle
    Danny Boyle
    • Self
    Andrew Macdonald
    • Self
    John Stanford
    • Self - professor, University College London
    Cillian Murphy
    Cillian Murphy
    • Self
    Brendan Gleeson
    Brendan Gleeson
    • Self
    Christopher Eccleston
    Christopher Eccleston
    • Self
    Megan Burns
    Megan Burns
    • Self
    Henry Camilleri
    • Self - military advisor
    Marvin Campbell
    Marvin Campbell
    • Self
    • (non citato nei titoli originali)
    Junior Laniyan
    • Self
    • (non citato nei titoli originali)
    Ray Panthaki
    Ray Panthaki
    • Self
    • (non citato nei titoli originali)
    • Regia
      • Toby James
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti9

    6,1292
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Recensioni in evidenza

    vaudevillejones

    Not enough of anything

    I think that there is a lot to be said about 28 Days Later, as this documentary makes clear. The creation of a deserted London, the military training the actors went through, the camera-work and the special effects, the inspiration for the story- but this documentary just touches on these things without going into any depth. It spends a lot of time on the possibility of a killer pandemic breaking out in a way that is utterly undisturbing. There have been plenty of terrifying disease outbreaks in the world that have been a genuine cause for concern, and this one concentrates on... foot-and-mouth, a disease that is only frightening if you're a farmer. There are lots of very clever people talking about biology pointlessly. The bits dealing with the film itself are equally shallow. We get a few "this movie is great, go see it" bits from the cast and crew (in which Christopher Eccleston ends up looking extremely luvvieish). The bits on the making of the movie tell you very little. What they tell you is enough to make you curious, but is ultimately unsatisfying. Example: we are told the cast playing soldiers went through a military boot camp. But there is very little on the boot camp itself. We learn that the makeup effects were complicated, but we get nothing beyond the standard "gruelling six hours in makeup" anecdotes that all actors tell whether you want them to or not. Then add to that the overuse of clips from the film that are only vaguely relevant to the documentary. Mention of the military intervention in the foot-and-mouth crisis is followed by Major West's "We must be a disappointment to you" speech. Mention of hospitals is followed by Jim awaking from his coma. This is pointless filler if you've seen the film and spoils a lot of the impact if you haven't. Really, this should have been an hour-long documentary on the film itself. As it is, it's rushed and frankly dull. Don't waste your half hour.
    5Polaris_DiB

    Basically the average special feature

    I don't buy DVDs for the extras, I buy them for the movies, but every now and then I do like to go through and see what else the DVD has to offer. This little documentary is featured on the special edition DVD of 28 Days Later... and calls itself a "making of", though it doesn't really seem to talk much about any actual production, but more about the thoughts and feelings the cast and crew share about their work and the effect the movie had on them...

    ...so it's basically the average special edition making-of documentary that doesn't really do anything.

    That said, it does deserve a little bit of credit: the beginning and final lines of it could almost be said to be scarier than the movie itself, because it deals very straightforwardly with the impending doom of a pandemic and what effect that could have with us. While it still contains a lot of guesswork and mainly anxieties about such a situation, our world currently seems one constantly on the lookout for the next virus to arise and drastically reduce our masses. The discussions of the filmmakers and the footage of such things as hundreds of animal carcasses from hoof-and-mouth disease bring a sense of reality to the largely metaphorical movie it accompanies, which does in a sense really help us feel more terrified by the ideas presented in the film.

    Too bad it didn't really stick with that vein, or at least go fully into the "making-of" premise it promised, else it might be really worth the price of the disc itself.

    --PolarisDiB
    3Theo Robertson

    Tries To Be Two Things At Once And Fails

    I problem I have with this documentary is that it can`t decide to be about viruses or about the making of 28 DAYS LATER so it tries to be both and considering it lasts for 20 minutes it fails on both attempts . The making of 28 DAYS LATER segments are very predictable composed mainly of actors telling us how they got in shape for the part and what it`s like firing a gun , but the segments with the scientists talking about the possible dangers to humanity posed by viruses is very disappointing . It`s patently obvious that none of the scientists interviewed have any knowledge of the film otherwise they`d have mentioned the ridiculously short incubation period of rage . And I also got the feeling the interviews were severly edited in order to sensationalise them . Yes a superbug is very dangerous and some of them are resistant to antibiotics but this is because doctors have been overprescribing antibiotics for years something not mentioned here . Similarly the devastation caused by the foot and mouth outbreak in Britain last year is mentioned but it wasn`t mentioned that the mountains of animal carcasses was caused by laws that require a completely healthy herd of cattle to be slaughtered if only one of them was infected . It wasn`t the foot and mouth virus that devastated British agriculture last year ( How could it when most of the slaughtered livestock weren`t infected ? ) but laws drawn up to stop the disease spreading . Not only is foot and mouth harmless to all humans but it`s also non fatal to most farmyard livestock - it just makes them sick and loose a lot of weight . So " A virus similar to foot and mouth disease sweeping through the human race " doesn`t scare me very much
    khearne

    Annoyed

    This documentary, that is on the DVD, spent most of its time talking about the probability of a super-virus that will wipe out humanity. I *thought* the documentary was meant to be about how they shot all the really great scenes in London in the film.

    Time spent on how the scenes were shot/created and time spent on make-up effects for the infected was very very minimal. We have been waiting for this DVD since we saw the film in the cinema only to be annoyed and disappointed that a documentary sub-titled "The Making of 28 Days Later" actually spent very little time talking about how it was made. The rest was sensationalist garbage about viruses.

    A waste of time watching if you were looking for technical details and secrets of production.
    bob the moo

    More a long trailer than a good `making of' documentary

    To coincide with the UK release of 28 Days Later this documentary looks at the reality behind the film, using mad cow disease as an example. The second half of the film looks the writing of the film, the cast and behind the scenes of making the film.

    I taped this hoping that this documentary would be the quality you can find on a good DVD rather than an advert style programme. However this manages to fall between these two stools and be good if not quite as good as you'd hope it would be. The first half is interesting with experts saying how real a rapid viral infection could be, even if it uses BSE as an example. I still found it difficult to envisage the UK decimated by a virus and at times it felt they were talking it up not out of scientific interest but to sell the film.

    The second half is a little more interesting because it looks at the cast and the process of making the film. It does tend to err a little on the side of patting each other on the back for a job well done but it is interesting at points. The film looks at how they made London appear deserted as well as the boot camp used to train the soldiers, but not in very much detail. It's a shame because no real good stories come out of it and it never manages to be insightful or any more interesting than the promotional interviews that the cast all have to do anyway.

    Overall I was pretty let down by this. It was made by the filmmakers themselves and I hoped more effort would have been put in. For 20 odd minutes it is still worth a watch once but to be honest it is as much a fancy trailer as it is a documentary.

    Altri elementi simili

    28 Days Later: The Aftermath (Chapter 3) - Decimation
    6,5
    28 Days Later: The Aftermath (Chapter 3) - Decimation
    28 Days Later: The Aftermath (Chapter 1)
    6,2
    28 Days Later: The Aftermath (Chapter 1)
    6,0
    28 Weeks Later: 77 Days Later
    48 Days Later
    6,5
    48 Days Later
    No Food 28 Days: 6 Months Later
    No Food 28 Days: 6 Months Later
    28 Hours Later: The Zombie Movie
    5,0
    28 Hours Later: The Zombie Movie
    28 giorni dopo
    7,5
    28 giorni dopo
    28 Weeks Later: Jealous Rage
    6,9
    28 Weeks Later: Jealous Rage
    Brock Wilbur: 28 Years Later
    4,9
    Brock Wilbur: 28 Years Later
    28 Weeks Later: The Infected
    6,2
    28 Weeks Later: The Infected
    6,7
    28 Hours Later
    In2ruders
    5,4
    In2ruders

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      This featurette is featured on the 28 giorni dopo (2002) DVD, released in 2003.
    • Connessioni
      Features 28 giorni dopo (2002)

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 4 novembre 2002 (Regno Unito)
    • Paese di origine
      • Regno Unito
    • Lingua
      • Inglese
    • Azienda produttrice
      • Picture Production Company
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      20 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Stereo

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    Cillian Murphy in 28 giorni dopo (2002)
    Divario superiore
    By what name was Pure Rage: The Making of '28 Days Later' (2002) officially released in Canada in English?
    Rispondi
    • Visualizza altre lacune di informazioni
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica pagina

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.