VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,9/10
2782
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaThe story of a love affair that begins during a picnic on the Thai-Burmese border.The story of a love affair that begins during a picnic on the Thai-Burmese border.The story of a love affair that begins during a picnic on the Thai-Burmese border.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
Apichatpong Weerasethakul is exemplary in pointing to new ways of telling cinematic stories. Here he presents us with a beautiful canvas of cultural impressionism and profound poetic daubings.
Certainly not boring. Certainly not pretentious. And if you find it slow, then you need to readjust your perception of what 'narrative' can do. Slow is a relative term. The inference from some commentators is that slow equals languid and thus dull. But this is anything but languid or dull. It is a beautiful rumination, a poem of pace and intrigue and voluptuous sensitivity.
Sit back, relax and don't rush (where is everyone rushing too, anyway?). Be with the moment and enjoy the art of a magnificent filmmaker.
Certainly not boring. Certainly not pretentious. And if you find it slow, then you need to readjust your perception of what 'narrative' can do. Slow is a relative term. The inference from some commentators is that slow equals languid and thus dull. But this is anything but languid or dull. It is a beautiful rumination, a poem of pace and intrigue and voluptuous sensitivity.
Sit back, relax and don't rush (where is everyone rushing too, anyway?). Be with the moment and enjoy the art of a magnificent filmmaker.
Please do not feel sorry for anyone associated with trying to make something beautiful. A film does not need to have a beginning or an ending, or an elaborate story, it can simply contain moments in time, it can be a visual sensation, this art form, like all, needs not be strictly defined. If you found Blissfully Yours boring, fair game. But this magnificent film put a smile on my face for much of the second half, because I felt what it meant for me to feel, this film is 1000% feeling, so it's great for those who can feel. When we step into nature we can truly suspend time. "Roong, what time is it?", "Wait, I'm still having fun."
The hype surrounding Apichatpong seems to me unwarranted. I am reminded of Roger Ebert's comments on Abbas Kiarostami and being utterly unconvinced of the value of his films.
First, there is no story. As soon as a story might be emerging, "Joe" (as he likes to be called these days) moves to something utterly unrelated. He has said that he conceives of nature as an opportunity for the characters to do some self-reflection. This sounds good, but there are no characters to speak of, and except for Orn, no acting whatsoever. No information is given about what they might be reflecting about, and story elements are allowed to vanish (like the distant gunshot).
The slowness itself didn't bother me, but the much-heralded Apichatpong can learn something from Tony Bui, whose first feature film "Three Seasons" is FAR better at the languid development than this. Or look at any of Ousman Sembene's films for the skillful use of dreadfully unskillful non-actors. There is just no excuse, in my mind, for such a self-important and ultimately inept use of non-actors.
User federovsky's comments are to me particularly perceptive. I give it 3; at least he is giving this some thought.
First, there is no story. As soon as a story might be emerging, "Joe" (as he likes to be called these days) moves to something utterly unrelated. He has said that he conceives of nature as an opportunity for the characters to do some self-reflection. This sounds good, but there are no characters to speak of, and except for Orn, no acting whatsoever. No information is given about what they might be reflecting about, and story elements are allowed to vanish (like the distant gunshot).
The slowness itself didn't bother me, but the much-heralded Apichatpong can learn something from Tony Bui, whose first feature film "Three Seasons" is FAR better at the languid development than this. Or look at any of Ousman Sembene's films for the skillful use of dreadfully unskillful non-actors. There is just no excuse, in my mind, for such a self-important and ultimately inept use of non-actors.
User federovsky's comments are to me particularly perceptive. I give it 3; at least he is giving this some thought.
This film is banded in Thailand I haven't seen it yet . Almost people don't know this film even it got some awards nothing in Television news May be this 2003 may some chance in cinema but R version .This film got NC-17 because of naked scenes . It about Love story that some I don't understand I think all of you should see this film if you have a chance .
An earlier film by Apichatpong Weerasethakul. To pause for a second, it is amazing how relatively easy it is these days to watch cinema from all over the world. That alone constitutes something akin to bliss for me at least.
I would say seek out other films by Weerasethakul first, and then proceed to this one if you wish. There is an enchanted Thai forest here as well as in "Uncle Boonme." His admiration (not quite the right word) for middle-age women seems to be frequent, here it is juxtaposed with an almost Romeo and Juliet, or Adam and Eve, love story. Roong seems so young, and Min is clearly a visitor in her heart, and her country.
There is some sentiment for the director on the "illegal alien" (always a bit strange phrase), Min is minimally communicative in the scenes with the two dominating women, is given voice-over monologues and over-layed sketchings.
Min's skin is featured in the film, don't let it trouble you. But it seems his skin is rejecting Thailand. I guess if this film says anything it's that bliss is fleeting if not even misunderstood. The lovers try to find a place remove from the Orn-ery every day grind, a place between two countries, a sweet safe place off the map.
However, every picnic has ants waiting for it.
I would say seek out other films by Weerasethakul first, and then proceed to this one if you wish. There is an enchanted Thai forest here as well as in "Uncle Boonme." His admiration (not quite the right word) for middle-age women seems to be frequent, here it is juxtaposed with an almost Romeo and Juliet, or Adam and Eve, love story. Roong seems so young, and Min is clearly a visitor in her heart, and her country.
There is some sentiment for the director on the "illegal alien" (always a bit strange phrase), Min is minimally communicative in the scenes with the two dominating women, is given voice-over monologues and over-layed sketchings.
Min's skin is featured in the film, don't let it trouble you. But it seems his skin is rejecting Thailand. I guess if this film says anything it's that bliss is fleeting if not even misunderstood. The lovers try to find a place remove from the Orn-ery every day grind, a place between two countries, a sweet safe place off the map.
However, every picnic has ants waiting for it.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizCredit sequence doesn't begin until 45 minutes into the film.
- Versioni alternativeTwo different cut versions were released on DVD and VCD in Thailand. Both versions are missing the following footage:
- A six-minute driving scene in which Tommy follows Orn on his motorcycle;
- A two-minute scene of Roong and Min driving to the jungle;
- A one-minute scene of Roong fondling Min's penis (with a clear view of Min's erection in the process). The original Thai release is missing an additional scene:
- A ten-minute sequence of Orn and Tommy making love on the forest floor. The UK DVD from Second Run and the French DVD from mk2 are uncut. Both versions of the Thai DVD/VCD were withdrawn when the Thai censors decided to ban the film.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Blissfully Yours?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 18.720 USD
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti