Un ex pistolero è costretto a riprendere le armi quando lui e il suo bestiame sono minacciati da un legislatore corrotto.Un ex pistolero è costretto a riprendere le armi quando lui e il suo bestiame sono minacciati da un legislatore corrotto.Un ex pistolero è costretto a riprendere le armi quando lui e il suo bestiame sono minacciati da un legislatore corrotto.
- Premi
- 1 vittoria e 5 candidature totali
Patricia Stutz
- Ralph's Wife
- (as Pat Stutz)
Diego Diablo Del Mar
- Ballester
- (as Diego Del Mar)
Recensioni in evidenza
Boss, Charley, Mose and Button are free rangers crossing America with their herd. When Mose gets beaten up and imprisoned by a Marshall in the employee of cruel rancher Baxter, Boss and Charley ride into town and help him back to the camp. However Baxter sends him men to scatter their herd - during which they kill Mose. With Button seriously injured, Boss and Charley ride into town to get justice.
It is perhaps a good thing that the unjustified criticism and media-driven-hatred of Kevin Costner is starting to subside, but we must be careful not to be too forgiving of him and too quick to heap praise on him. Open Range was greeted with rave reviews and hyped claims that it doesn't totally live up to - but it still manages to be an enjoyable and well made film. The film opens very weakly with an overly-wholesome feel and `aw-shucks' dialogue that continues for the first ten minutes. However after this the film gets better and settles down into more of an acceptable tone. The film is never really very dark, but it has a nice tension to it that runs even when the film is amusing.
If it has one major flaw it is that it is too slow to really be enjoyed by all. Even as someone used to the slow pace of many westerns, I found this to really try my patience at times. It is not so much the pace of the film as the feeling of it dragging. The actual pace works quite well for this film but it should have been edited a bit tighter to offset the drag - there are plenty of moments where it could have been trimmed to it's benefit, and the film could easily have lost 15 minutes. The slow pace helps in one regard - the final gunfight. When the standoff finally comes it is violent, long and very impacting. Some reviewers have complained about the lack of realism in the fight, but I actually think that the misses (although excessive) are more believable than scores of direct hits. The gunfight is all the more surprising for Charley's sudden return to character. His dark past is hinted at, but when it comes it comes with a thunder - the sound effects are tremendous, the first shot made me jump and the rest were just as loud.
Some issues are smudged: it is too hard to believe that Sue would be unmarried, Charley's descent is not that well done and both Mose and Buttons are poor characters - but it is easy to ignore these. The characters are not great but they are good enough for this. Duvall is the best thing in the film, his easy charm compliments the slow pace and he makes for nice slow-poke humour. Costner is as good, he is unassuming - not a great character but good enough for a western. Bening is good despite being given the romantic subplot to handle. Support is good from Gambon, the late Jeter and others in solid, if stereotypical roles. On a personal note it was good to see Kim Coates in a big screen movie.
Overall, this got big praise, but it will likely not covert anyone to be a western fan. As a genre film it is very enjoyable but it is hard to ignore the clichéd slow-motion, the overly slow pace and the indiscipline of the editing. However the film is enjoyable, funny, patient and, when it comes, brutally impacting.
It is perhaps a good thing that the unjustified criticism and media-driven-hatred of Kevin Costner is starting to subside, but we must be careful not to be too forgiving of him and too quick to heap praise on him. Open Range was greeted with rave reviews and hyped claims that it doesn't totally live up to - but it still manages to be an enjoyable and well made film. The film opens very weakly with an overly-wholesome feel and `aw-shucks' dialogue that continues for the first ten minutes. However after this the film gets better and settles down into more of an acceptable tone. The film is never really very dark, but it has a nice tension to it that runs even when the film is amusing.
If it has one major flaw it is that it is too slow to really be enjoyed by all. Even as someone used to the slow pace of many westerns, I found this to really try my patience at times. It is not so much the pace of the film as the feeling of it dragging. The actual pace works quite well for this film but it should have been edited a bit tighter to offset the drag - there are plenty of moments where it could have been trimmed to it's benefit, and the film could easily have lost 15 minutes. The slow pace helps in one regard - the final gunfight. When the standoff finally comes it is violent, long and very impacting. Some reviewers have complained about the lack of realism in the fight, but I actually think that the misses (although excessive) are more believable than scores of direct hits. The gunfight is all the more surprising for Charley's sudden return to character. His dark past is hinted at, but when it comes it comes with a thunder - the sound effects are tremendous, the first shot made me jump and the rest were just as loud.
Some issues are smudged: it is too hard to believe that Sue would be unmarried, Charley's descent is not that well done and both Mose and Buttons are poor characters - but it is easy to ignore these. The characters are not great but they are good enough for this. Duvall is the best thing in the film, his easy charm compliments the slow pace and he makes for nice slow-poke humour. Costner is as good, he is unassuming - not a great character but good enough for a western. Bening is good despite being given the romantic subplot to handle. Support is good from Gambon, the late Jeter and others in solid, if stereotypical roles. On a personal note it was good to see Kim Coates in a big screen movie.
Overall, this got big praise, but it will likely not covert anyone to be a western fan. As a genre film it is very enjoyable but it is hard to ignore the clichéd slow-motion, the overly slow pace and the indiscipline of the editing. However the film is enjoyable, funny, patient and, when it comes, brutally impacting.
They don't westerns that much anymore, at least on the big screen. People in the Baby Boomer generation grew up with them on television. Western films were big at the box office in several decades, too.
Well, at least Kevin Costner must have a heart for the genre as he been involved with several major western productions in the last 15 years, this the latest.
The best thing I can say about this film right out front is that it may be the best western I've ever watched. I can't give it higher praise than that! Since I've seen so many, for so long, it's especially high praise.
I make this bold statement because of the following:
1 - Fantastic scenery and beautiful cinematography. If it looks spectacular on my 24-inch flat-screen, I can't imagine how awesome it would be a big plasma set.
2 - Characters you really care about, led by three actors who almost always give solid performances: Robert Duvall (the best in here), Costner and Annette Bening. Duvall, by the way, gives one of the best short "speeches" I've ever witnessed in a movie. It was nice to see Bening actually play a wholesome woman for a change. The two men who are out on the range with Duvall and Costner also were excellent.
3 - Just the right amount of action. When the action does occur, such as gunfire, the sound is incredible. This might be one of the best movies, audibly-speaking, I've ever heard, which is another reason for ranking it Number One. There are no lulls but not a ton of action, either.
4 - Just the right amount of romance. It doesn't get sappy, it doesn't overshadow the basic story, but it adds a nice, soft touch to what could be a very rough and unpleasant tale. And, in a different twist, it's the romance, not the usual climactic gun battle, that ends this film.
I can't say enough about this movie except that I'm sorry more westerns like it aren't made today.
Well, at least Kevin Costner must have a heart for the genre as he been involved with several major western productions in the last 15 years, this the latest.
The best thing I can say about this film right out front is that it may be the best western I've ever watched. I can't give it higher praise than that! Since I've seen so many, for so long, it's especially high praise.
I make this bold statement because of the following:
1 - Fantastic scenery and beautiful cinematography. If it looks spectacular on my 24-inch flat-screen, I can't imagine how awesome it would be a big plasma set.
2 - Characters you really care about, led by three actors who almost always give solid performances: Robert Duvall (the best in here), Costner and Annette Bening. Duvall, by the way, gives one of the best short "speeches" I've ever witnessed in a movie. It was nice to see Bening actually play a wholesome woman for a change. The two men who are out on the range with Duvall and Costner also were excellent.
3 - Just the right amount of action. When the action does occur, such as gunfire, the sound is incredible. This might be one of the best movies, audibly-speaking, I've ever heard, which is another reason for ranking it Number One. There are no lulls but not a ton of action, either.
4 - Just the right amount of romance. It doesn't get sappy, it doesn't overshadow the basic story, but it adds a nice, soft touch to what could be a very rough and unpleasant tale. And, in a different twist, it's the romance, not the usual climactic gun battle, that ends this film.
I can't say enough about this movie except that I'm sorry more westerns like it aren't made today.
Costner admitted early in his career he was not an "artist", but rather a commodity, or star. I don't disagree. He was a handsome face but he always had an authenticity in his performances too. Very natural on camera. In Open Range, he's at his best. He's the type of guy who is just comfortable in front of the camera and you look at him and feel he's being honest. An honest performance that makes you feel he's not acting in any way. He reminds me of Gary Cooper in that way. A guy who isn't bullsh**ting and you believe every word he says. I love him in this movie. I love the way he speaks to the woman he can't express his love to. I love her in this too.
Personally, I didn't find it long. I've seen many great Westerns--such films as "Will Penny," "Shane," "The Unforgiven," and several other Eastwood movies spring to mind--and this was right up there with them. My thanks to Kevin Costner, Robert Duvall (of course), and Annette Bening for giving me a wonderful experience at the movies. It doesn't happen all that often anymore. To those who say, "They don't make 'em like they used to," my response is "This one's better."
I've seen this movie at least ten times. I watch it whenever I stumble across it scheduled on a cable channel. I think it is the best movie Kevin Costner has ever made. I would not call myself a big Kevin Costner fan. I think he too often over reaches. This movie however he nailed. Duval is positively superb. I do not recall Duval ever bad, well except maybe his brief turn in To Kill a Mockingbird. I am not enough of a movie buff to be able attribute his performance in this film to Costner's direction or Duval's feel for the character. I cannot recall Costner ever playing a role as subtlety as he does in this. I think he understood this character and was willing to share the screen with his costars. I give MS Benning huge props for playing this film without apparent makeup. All credit to Costner for the mood of this movie never wavering. The cinematography was excellent.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizOriginally, Touchstone Pictures had Kevin Costner top-billed over Robert Duvall, but Costner asked the studio to top-bill Duvall instead.
- BlooperCharlie fires 16-17 rapid fires shots from one single-action, six-shot revolver - without reloading. In fact, during the first volley, he fires four random shots and then actually "fans" the revolver and fires ten additional shots into a bad-guy gunslinger in less than seven seconds, without changing weapons or re-loading. And then fires a few more rounds at still standing gun-men. Costner admitted in an interview for this film that he has always wanted to film a scene where he fans a six-gun way over the realistic amount of shots, and that this scene was indeed very enjoyable to make.
- Citazioni
Sue Barlow: I don't have the answers, Charley. But I know that people get confused in this life about what they want, and what they've done, and what they think they should've because of it. Everything they think they are or did, takes hold so hard that it won't let them see what they can be.
- Versioni alternativeAMC version severely edits Butler's death. The sound of the gunshot that kills him is played at a lower volume, and the scenes of him falling back is sped up, so as to avoid showing the hole in his head from the shot.
- Colonne sonoreHolding All My Love for You
Written by Michael Kamen (BMI) and Julianna Raye (BMI)
Performed by Julianna Raye
Produced by James Harrah
(P) (C) K-Man Corp. (BMI) / Ziffy Music, Inc. (BMI) / Open Range Productions USA, Inc. (BMI)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Open Range?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 22.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 58.331.254 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 14.047.781 USD
- 17 ago 2003
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 68.296.293 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 19 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
What is the Japanese language plot outline for Terra di confine - Open Range (2003)?
Rispondi