[go: up one dir, main page]

    Calendario delle usciteI migliori 250 filmI film più popolariEsplora film per genereCampione d’incassiOrari e bigliettiNotizie sui filmFilm indiani in evidenza
    Cosa c’è in TV e in streamingLe migliori 250 serieLe serie più popolariEsplora serie per genereNotizie TV
    Cosa guardareTrailer più recentiOriginali IMDbPreferiti IMDbIn evidenza su IMDbGuida all'intrattenimento per la famigliaPodcast IMDb
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralTutti gli eventi
    Nato oggiCelebrità più popolariNotizie sulle celebrità
    Centro assistenzaZona contributoriSondaggi
Per i professionisti del settore
  • Lingua
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Lista Video
Accedi
  • Completamente supportata
  • English (United States)
    Parzialmente supportata
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Usa l'app
Guida agli episodi
  • Il Cast e la Troupe
  • Recensioni degli utenti
  • Quiz
  • Domande frequenti
IMDbPro

Firefly

  • Serie TV
  • 2002–2003
  • T
  • 45min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
8,9/10
292.608
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
POPOLARITÀ
237
25
Adam Baldwin, Nathan Fillion, Ron Glass, Sean Maher, Jewel Staite, Gina Torres, Alan Tudyk, Morena Baccarin, and Summer Glau in Firefly (2002)
Firefly Season 1 Trailer
Riproduci trailer1: 01
5 video
99+ foto
AvventuraDrammaFantascienzaSpazio e fantascienza

500 anni nel futuro, un gruppo di criminali a bordo di una piccola astronave tenta di sopravvivere viaggiando attraverso parti inesplorate della galassia ed evitando gli agenti che cercano d... Leggi tutto500 anni nel futuro, un gruppo di criminali a bordo di una piccola astronave tenta di sopravvivere viaggiando attraverso parti inesplorate della galassia ed evitando gli agenti che cercano di catturarli.500 anni nel futuro, un gruppo di criminali a bordo di una piccola astronave tenta di sopravvivere viaggiando attraverso parti inesplorate della galassia ed evitando gli agenti che cercano di catturarli.

  • Creazione
    • Joss Whedon
  • Star
    • Nathan Fillion
    • Gina Torres
    • Alan Tudyk
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • VALUTAZIONE IMDb
    8,9/10
    292.608
    LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
    POPOLARITÀ
    237
    25
    • Creazione
      • Joss Whedon
    • Star
      • Nathan Fillion
      • Gina Torres
      • Alan Tudyk
    • 897Recensioni degli utenti
    • 67Recensioni della critica
  • Vedi le informazioni sulla produzione su IMDbPro
  • Serie TV più votata #35
    • Vincitore di 1 Primetime Emmy
      • 5 vittorie e 8 candidature totali

    Episodi14

    Sfoglia gli episodi
    InizioI più votati1 stagione

    Video5

    Season 1 Trailer
    Trailer 1:01
    Season 1 Trailer
    Firefly: Safe
    Trailer 1:33
    Firefly: Safe
    Firefly: Safe
    Trailer 1:33
    Firefly: Safe
    Firefly: Our Mrs. Reynolds
    Trailer 1:25
    Firefly: Our Mrs. Reynolds
    Firefly: The Train Job
    Trailer 1:01
    Firefly: The Train Job
    Firefly: Serenity
    Trailer 1:31
    Firefly: Serenity

    Foto283

    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    Visualizza poster
    + 277
    Visualizza poster

    Interpreti principali99+

    Modifica
    Nathan Fillion
    Nathan Fillion
    • Captain Malcolm 'Mal' Reynolds
    • 2002–2003
    Gina Torres
    Gina Torres
    • Zoë Washburne
    • 2002–2003
    Alan Tudyk
    Alan Tudyk
    • Hoban 'Wash' Washburne
    • 2002–2003
    Morena Baccarin
    Morena Baccarin
    • Inara Serra
    • 2002–2003
    Adam Baldwin
    Adam Baldwin
    • Jayne Cobb
    • 2002–2003
    Jewel Staite
    Jewel Staite
    • Kaylee Frye
    • 2002–2003
    Sean Maher
    Sean Maher
    • Dr. Simon Tam
    • 2002–2003
    Summer Glau
    Summer Glau
    • River Tam
    • 2002–2003
    Ron Glass
    Ron Glass
    • Shepherd Derrial Book
    • 2002–2003
    Christina Hendricks
    Christina Hendricks
    • Saffron
    • 2002–2003
    Mark Sheppard
    Mark Sheppard
    • Badger
    • 2002
    Michael Fairman
    Michael Fairman
    • Adelai Niska
    • 2002
    Jeff Ricketts
    Jeff Ricketts
    • Man
    • 2002
    Dennis Cockrum
    Dennis Cockrum
    • Other Man
    • 2002
    Doug Savant
    Doug Savant
    • Commander Harken
    • 2002
    Gregory Itzin
    Gregory Itzin
    • Magistrate Higgins
    • 2002
    Richard Brooks
    Richard Brooks
    • Jubal Early
    • 2002
    Isabella Hofmann
    Isabella Hofmann
    • Regan Tam
    • 2002
    • Creazione
      • Joss Whedon
    • Tutti gli interpreti e le troupe
    • Produzione, botteghino e altro su IMDbPro

    Recensioni degli utenti897

    8,9292.6K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Riepilogo

    Reviewers say 'Firefly' is acclaimed for its innovative fusion of sci-fi and western genres, delivering a compelling futuristic narrative. The show is lauded for its deep character development and ensemble performances, particularly Nathan Fillion's Captain Mal Reynolds. The crew's camaraderie and unique personalities create a strong emotional connection. Central themes of family, survival, and resistance against an oppressive regime enrich the storyline. Despite its short run, 'Firefly' has garnered a loyal fanbase for its creative storytelling and character-focused plots.
    Generato dall’IA a partire dal testo delle recensioni degli utenti

    Recensioni in evidenza

    Darknessinthesky

    You will either love it, or hate it - read why...

    There is one big premise that you have to swallow in order to like this show. If you can't cope with it, you won't like it, because it will smack you in the face in every episode.

    It is like the James Bond movies, if you don't accept, as a premise, that Bond, James Bond, can do everything, fly, drive, shoot, use *every* piece of machinery on the planet, that he can shoot better than all his adversaries (who all miss, all the time) and gets *all* the babes, if you don't accept this, you have to hate James Bond movies, because they are ridiculous. We talk about suspense of disbelief.

    The one thing you have to swallow, without thinking about it, is, that in this particular science fiction universe, the future looks like this:

    You have core planets, which are like one would imagine future worlds: Big, beautiful buildings, hight tech gadgets, spaceships and shuttles, modern weapons (some that don't kill by using some kind of sonic boom), flat displays, a modern, digital credit system instead of localised currency, a totally diverse people influenced by every imaginable culture, heavily influenced by the chinese society, the only remaining superpower besides the USA and so forth.

    But, and this is a capitalized BUT: There are also the outer rim planets. They don't have a developed infrastructure and such. Settlers are dumped on planets with next to nothing, exploited to recover raw materials, used as cheap labor, trying to survive. Still sounds reasonable, no? The catch is: all these outer rim worlds look like you have been thrown into a cheap spaghetti WESTERN movie.

    They trade cows, they use old revolvers, drive horses and dress in western-style garments. You have little, old, dirty small villages with a saloon and stuff. These outer rim planets, out of reach of the civilised Alliance, are a no-mans-land, with superstitious, uneducated fools, where the strong fist rules - if you have the most men and guns behind you, you are the law. The poor grunt is like the cowboy in a typical western movie.

    Hard to accept? Partially yes, of course. But there is logic in almost everything: there are future references everywhere! Real food (as opposed to synthesized proteins) is a rare commodity, the RICH guys have laser guns or state of the art display devices.

    And - they stay true to this premise throughout the show, which is a rare thing in today's entertainment.

    But apart from this (for some) hard to accept premise, this show is the most entertaining, clever, realistic(!), funny, imaginative, creative, thrilling piece of entertainment I had the pleasure of viewing (by downloading it from the internet) in years (don't get me wrong: I downloaded it because I live in Germany and the show was never aired here, and I asked my brother, who lives in the USA, to get me the DVD as a christmas present - and he did)

    As for realism: Why do they still use guns to kill people, why not lasers like in Star Trek (which i am avid fan of)? I say: guns kill people, bullets are cheap. Guns get the killing done. (And there are modern (bullet) guns and lasers in the show, they exist, they are simply not widespread and only available to the rich.

    No sound in space - a little thing with big impact. Not only is it realistic, but it adds to the atmosphere. Instead of ridiculous sound effects the scenes in space are underlaid with vivid music, only emphasising the vastness and nothingness of space.

    The basics of the universe comply with our world. In the outer rim, where modern civilization hasn't gotten a foothold yet, things - which are to us - common, are valuable merchandise! Just imagine the third world... How much worth are medicine, guns, food there? There are (to us) barbaric customs in uncivilised areas of the world and all this is being portrayed in the show.

    The Plots are great, not like in Enterprise where you seem to have seen everything somewhere before, these plots are unique, thrilling and exciting. I have seen episodes where I thought "ok, I get it" and then *wham* the story turns into a totally different direction. Surprises at every corner.

    The show is so refreshingly politically incorrect, I don't want to give away plot details, but there are situations you know from your movie/series experience and think OMG there we go again (Hostage situations someone?) and then*boom* - the protagonist does EXACTLY what WE would wish to do but which every movie/series is afraid of doing because it is not PC.

    The characters are three dimensional and so well laid out. This "family" on board a little spaceship, a confined space(!), with all their motivations, quirks and problems, trying to get along and achieve their goals, are so believable and make for a hell of a ride.

    The creators of this show have, in the first 14 episodes, established plots, characters and atmosphere that other science fiction series have only managed to achieve - if ever - in the last seasons of their time on air.

    Such a pity that most American viewers couldn't see behind a bold, unique, hilarious - if difficult to accept at first glance - premise... and see the beautiful gem of a show behind it.
    Welsh_Corgie

    Counterpoint, apparently

    Comparable in flavor to critically-acclaimed Cowboy Bebop. If you're one of the many people that enjoy a good, character-driven show, with a decent plotline and writing hand-crafted by some of the finest in the business, then this is the show for you. Apparently so for the Fox network, but only for a few weeks. Thankfully, the show was released in its entirety on DVD, in all of its glory. Also, as if the brilliant episodes weren't enough to satisfy, there are great, insightful commentaries on most episodes, by creator Joss Whedon and others, and lots of other extras. I can't say enough about this show. Everyone was sad to see this show go, especially the stars.

    ***** out of *****
    10littlemissknowitall

    Could have been great

    As with BtVS, the world is divided into people who get Firefly and people who don't. In this series Joss Whedon created one of the most realistic post-war visions of the future ever committed to tape, that at the same time spoke about yesterday and today. Maybe a little too much today for its own good.

    The series is anti-corporate, anti-government and, while it takes the stand that some things are worth fighting for, it is largely anti-war. No wonder FOX did everything in its power to kill it off, including airing episodes out of order, skipping weeks after airing only three eps and, inevitably canceling the show without even airing episodes 12, 13 and 14 (out of 15). This was particularly damaging, as Firefly had a greater sense of ongoing plot than any other Whedon series in its first year. Viewers were left wondering, on more than one occasion, when a character would reference something we hadn't seen yet.

    The backstage dramatics aside, Firefly is intelligent and, like Buffy, mythic - except this time Whedon is dealing with the myth of America: the Frontier, the Civil War, the rise of the Corporation, etc . . .

    Firefly is a demanding show. It asks its audience to appreciate the shades of grey in its characters' moral scale. The villains are not comfortingly dressed as an alien race. In 500 years mankind will still be its own worst enemy. Technology will be in the hands of a privileged few, and others will in "The Black" - Whedon's frontier third world - where it is possible to exist without the interference (or benefit) of civilization and government. Things will be dirty, and used. Firefly creates a universe that almost totally opposes that of (that bastion of television sci-fi) Star Trek: its Federation-like central power (the Alliance) is interpreted as being oppressive and dystopic. We are on the side of those who resisted (like the Maqui) and lost.

    The acting is strong, the writing as excellent, funny and moving as on any Whedon show, and the effects and sets create a consistent, believable world. It is a shame the series didn't have a more hospitable environment in which to grow and become all it could have been.
    nchanter

    addicting

    I felt I had to comment on this show because of another persons negative opinion on it(target audience of 8 or 9 years). I find this show addicting and the characters far more interesting than many sci-fi shows that have gained far more publicity because of their special effects. Each character is very well developed and entices the audience to want to find out more about them. As a personal response as to why weapons haven't developed beyond the space western....several of the episodes show scenes of past and current technology far more advanced than the weapons used in the show on a regular basis.laser guns,magnetic grapplers,floating cities,multiple brain surgeries involving nerve manipulation,killer sonic tech,and much more. The show is set on the frontier of known space with characters that are not rich. A regular western gun is all that can be safely used on a spaceship. Another gun, whether laser or high caliber projectile weapon will pierce the hull and cause major problems for the crew..if not kill them outright.

    The social intricacies of the companions and the "Houses" they come from, the military training of the "shepherd" preacher, the developing psionic powers of "the crazy sister-river" and all the others leads me to believe that Whedon put a lot of planning and thought into each character and the personal world they live in. They all seem to have a substantial, believable past. They all seem to have personal goals that are not necessarily tied to the show...as if they could leave at any time if their lives and beliefs take them that way. This comes across as very believable.

    While others are entitled to their own opinion, all of this, in my opinion, makes me think this show is worth every penny spent to produce it. I also own it.
    dysamoria

    Another series canceled for lack of simple-minded stupidity

    Series creator Joss Whedon took a somewhat familiar concept (science fiction as the new "wild west frontier") and freshened it up with a lively, chemistry-rich cast of characters, a richly detailed, plausible and interesting social setting, a dash of excitement, classic science fiction "find the better part of humanity" ideals, a goal to avoid or make light of most of the tired and worn-out genre cliches and a fantastic production team. The resulting product? An excellent piece of original artful entertainment that was a breath of fresh air in the stagnating science fiction scene on television (or anywhere else).

    Today, where is Firefly? Canceled after airing about 11 episodes, out of order, of the mere 13 episodes contracted. Why? Fox executives considered the ratings to be "abysmal." Were they? This may be subjective. At the time, Fox was (and still is) pushing almost costless, content-free exploitative "reality television" (such as Joe Millionaire) and formula-reuse "genre simulation" eye candy (such as "John Doe"). In comparison, Firefly, with film quality special effects, a full cast, directors, writers, editors and so forth likely looked to be a much smaller payout. After all, television in the USA is not about art or entertainment; it is about making as much money from sponsors as possible.

    Fox didn't think that the Firefly pilot was "exciting" enough. Joss Whedon made some changes to address their concerns. Then Fox didn't even bother to SHOW the pilot until the very last airdate of Firefly, prior to cancellation ("tonight's special: two hour celebration of the cancellation of Firefly!"). Promotion of Firefly was half-hearted at best. On a channel that tells its viewers "Hey, who needs drama?" is there any chance that the marketing people even know HOW to promote something other than sitcoms and exploitative reality shows? Fox is basically telling its own audience that it doesn't like its own programming, so why should people watch it??

    As we face the homogenization of television content, Firefly was a brilliant spark of newness and excitement for those of us (the few) in the television audience that desire thought-provoking story-telling and entertainment that actually requires a viewer's mind to be active instead of blank. To some of us, the outcome was never really in question; how could something this good survive on networks (and with advertisers) that believe the lowest-common-denominator is their ideal target?

    Knowing the likely outcome, the failure of Firefly hurts all the more because of just how good it actually was in such a short amount of time.

    It wasn't about the space ships; it was about the life lived in and around them. It wasn't about the aliens (there weren't any); it was about the people. It wasn't about the struggle between the evil bad-guys and the super heros; it was about the daily struggle to BE a "good-guy" in a world filled with people who often didn't try very hard and the fact that sometimes the heros are just regular people afterall. It wasn't about the sex; it was about the attitudes people have about sex. It wasn't about the profits; it was about selling a good product and deserving the profits.

    It is quite telling to see what kind of programming thrives in this economy and what kind of programming gets a sharp stick in the eye. If we are to believe the executives of Fox and other networks, the viewers of television in the USA are unintelligent, selfish and naive automatons that are only capable of being entertained by programs that exploit the failures, ignorance and stupidity of others.

    What if they're right?

    Luckily, we have the "hard-core" groups of fans to remind us that there are indeed a few active brains seeking stimulation out there. Not to say that all science fiction fans are the best of humanity, it is easy to see that they spend a little more time considering narrative and consequences of actions.

    The fans of Firefly funded, organized and accomplished an advertisement in Variety magazine to support Firefly. Yes, that's right. The fans bought advertising for their favorite show.

    Though it warmed the hearts of the Firefly production team, Fox wasn't impressed. Such groups of fandom are considered fringe and insignificant when compared to the mighty marketing numbers. Still, you have to admit, there must be something good about a show when the fans purchase advertising in major publications to support it.

    The fans still hope that Joss Whedon gets another open-minded network to see that Firefly has great potential as a successful, revenue-generating series. Whedon's previous exploits, the highly successful "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" series and its spin-offs, started with a similar "abysmal outlook" but another network had the foresight to give it a healthy chance when Fox was too eager to give up after not seeing instant success and profit after a handful of out-of-order showings. They didn't even bother to show all 13 episodes completed. Maybe someone at Fox's accounting departments ought to make note that it's a waste of resources to pay for episodes and then do nothing with them.

    The chance of recovery isn't good. People move on in search of more employment when the project they were on has been killed. The landscape of television business today has a tendency to portray intelligent programming as "unsuccessful" and "profit-less." Joss Whedon's past successes seem not to matter much to networks hell-bent on making huge profits on zero-product (much like the dot com explosion that ended spectacularly badly years back).

    Networks say they are giving the audiences what they want. It may be more accurate to suggest that networks are limiting the audience's ability to choose anything other than what they're given. It's not likely that everyone will simply turn off the TV and go read a book in protest, is it?

    Back to Firefly: If you like smart science fiction (or just smart fiction in general), well drawn characters and worlds, Firefly would have been a great show to escape into every Friday night as you relax from the daily rituals of work and responsibility. Too bad it never got much of a chance to entertain us.

    With the failure of Firefly at the hands of businessmen and executives who do not even like to watch their own programming, it is clear that the "future Joss Whedons" of television will have a harder time selling their projects to the networks. The result? There's plenty more where "Joe Millionaire" came from; there are countless other profit-seeking formulas that are taking the place of intelligent programming everywhere, calling themselves "Entertainment."

    Frightening.

    Altri elementi simili

    Human Planet
    9,0
    Human Planet
    Serenity
    7,8
    Serenity
    Life
    9,1
    Life
    Frozen Planet
    9,0
    Frozen Planet
    The World at War
    9,2
    The World at War
    The Blue Planet
    9,0
    The Blue Planet
    The Civil War
    9,0
    The Civil War
    Africa
    8,9
    Africa
    Decalogo
    8,9
    Decalogo
    Cosmos
    9,3
    Cosmos
    La guerra del Vietnam: un film di Ken Burns e Lynn Novick
    9,1
    La guerra del Vietnam: un film di Ken Burns e Lynn Novick
    Apocalypse - La seconda guerra mondiale
    9,0
    Apocalypse - La seconda guerra mondiale

    Trama

    Modifica

    Lo sapevi?

    Modifica
    • Quiz
      Between shots, the cast preferred to wait in the ship's lounge instead of their trailers/dressing rooms.
    • Blooper
      The Chinese characters for "Blue Sun" change from throughout the series. On Jayne's T-shirt, "Blue Sun" is Qing Ri, but in logo signs, it's Lan Ri. In ancient China, as well as Japan, green and blue were seen as different shades of the same color. The character Qing was used to represent both green and blue. In modern China, Lan is the character used for blue.
    • Citazioni

      opening song: Take my love, take my land / Take me where I cannot stand / I don't care, I'm still free / You can't take the sky from me / Take me out to the black / Tell 'em I ain't comin' back / Burn the land and boil the sea / You can't take the sky from me / There's no place I can be / Since I found serenity / But you can't take the sky from me

    • Versioni alternative
      The DVD episodes end with Joss Whedon and Tim Minear's Executive Producer credit washing across the screen, left to right. On the television episodes, instead of their names, a wireframe model of Serenity fades up.
    • Connessioni
      Featured in The Rotten Tomatoes Show: Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time/Sex and the City 2/MacGruber (2010)
    • Colonne sonore
      The Ballad of Serenity
      Performed by Sonny Rhodes

      Written by Joss Whedon

    I più visti

    Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
    Accedi

    Domande frequenti

    • How many seasons does Firefly have?
      Powered by Alexa
    • what gun does Captain Reynolds use as his main firearm?
    • How does "Firefly" relate to the film "Serenity?"
    • What is that other language that the characters are speaking?

    Dettagli

    Modifica
    • Data di uscita
      • 17 febbraio 2006 (Italia)
    • Paese di origine
      • Stati Uniti
    • Siti ufficiali
      • Hulu
      • Official Facebook
    • Lingue
      • Inglese
      • Mandarino
      • Catonese
    • Celebre anche come
      • Firefly: The Series
    • Luoghi delle riprese
      • Mojave Desert, Arizona, Stati Uniti
    • Aziende produttrici
      • Mutant Enemy
      • 20th Century Fox Television
    • Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro

    Specifiche tecniche

    Modifica
    • Tempo di esecuzione
      45 minuti
    • Colore
      • Color
    • Mix di suoni
      • Dolby Digital
    • Proporzioni
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribuisci a questa pagina

    Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
    • Risposte di IMDb: contribuisci ad integrare i nostri dati
    • Ottieni maggiori informazioni sulla partecipazione
    Modifica paginaAggiungi episodio

    Altre pagine da esplorare

    Visti di recente

    Abilita i cookie del browser per utilizzare questa funzione. Maggiori informazioni.
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Accedi per avere maggiore accessoAccedi per avere maggiore accesso
    Segui IMDb sui social
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    Per Android e iOS
    Scarica l'app IMDb
    • Aiuto
    • Indice del sito
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • Prendi in licenza i dati di IMDb
    • Sala stampa
    • Pubblicità
    • Lavoro
    • Condizioni d'uso
    • Informativa sulla privacy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, una società Amazon

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.