Dark Blood

"Dark Blood" known notoriously as River Phoenix's last film, as he died tragically and suddenly during filming, is what folks in the industry call a compromised film. With 80-85% of the scenes shot and after years upon years of dealing with legalities and George Sluizer himself trying to get his work back in his hands, "Dark Blood" is a film we can now watch and witness River Phoenix's last performance. Certainly, a bucket list item for many fans as this film had been "lost" my entire lifetime. A message to any who have waited--it is worth it. Based on some other reviews I have read, I have a differing opinion then most regarding the film as whole as I will try to explain the best I can.

At this point in time I have only seen one other film directed by Sluizer which is 1996's "Crimetime" so I do not have much to judge his talents from. All I can say is what really is the main attraction to the film, other than the fascination of Phoenix's last role, is the surprisingly fantastic directing and editing Sluizer managed to get done prior to his own death in 2014. This is potentially his best work even though scenes are missing. Sluizer makes a brave choice (and one he was definitely limited in making) by deciding to narrate the missing scenes over still shots or extra film that was taken during the shoot, and it works magnificently.

This works so well because the film already has a very spiritual and existential vibe to it. The major coincidence that nearly all of the intimate scenes are missing you would think the film would be worse off for it, but instead the poetic and specific details of the narration (from the script?) fits the footage Sluizer chose to overlay it with. The end result is haunting.

The three leads are all very strong. I think Phoenix is a bit overhyped, but part of that is probably because of his legacy and the overall fascination people can have with what could have been and that's ok. Jonathan Pryce and Judy Davis are really get compliments to the younger boy that River plays. I could feel some issues with the dynamics between the characters and I assume that is due to the immense strain and complications that infamously arose during production, but those mishaps are never large enough to disrupt the beautiful and arid desert aesthetic.

"Dark Blood" is far from flawless and that in itself is nearly the perfect compliment for a film that brings up the mixing of Native American and European races. As River's Boy mentions, "[There's] Dark blood in my veins" after he explains to Buffy what his heritage is. Maybe the film with all its imperfections is perfect in its own way.

... still very compelling. And a showcase of why River Phoenix was considered one the best amongst his peers. I hadn't read or heard too much about the troubled production of the movie. But I did talk to a few people and the magazine of the Berlin International Festival did have a few things to say about it too. But at the beginning of the movie you will get an introduction from the director explaining the situation and telling you, what you are about to see. And the fact, that there will be quite some amount of voice over.

While the voice over (telling us what would happen if the scenes were shot) is good, it never can fully compensate the impact moving pictures would have had. And it still is compelling, which all boils down to the performances of the actors involved. It's great they actually finished the movie and showed it. While not a masterpiece (couldn't be expected), it is there for people to see and enjoy.

I was really excited when in late 2011 George Sluizer announced that he was going to try to finish 'Dark Blood', some years after Sluizer had an aneurysm and learned that his remaining time was limited. I've heard of the difficulties surrounding the film, the legal complications and so on. So when it was announced that Mr Sluizer was going to raise money in order to be able to pay for the finishing of the film (the post-production: sound editing, editing, musical score, etc.) through Crowdfunding, I almost instantly donated some money through the CineCrowd website. In gratitude I received a very rare limited edition DVD, and some positive lit negatives inside the DVD-box. I was a bit surprised by the high quality of the footage, since it has not been used for 19 years or so. I know about the difficulties off set between River Phoenix and Judy Davis, and between Davis and the director. But it definitely doesn't show in the actual film. The acting is quite natural, and in my opinion the performances by River, Judy and Jonathan Pryce are pretty good. As I said before, the images are very clear, and the added sound effects and musical score are also in place here. The music at some points reminded me a bit of Pieter Bourke ans Lisa Gerrard's score for 'The Insider'. I'm not going to spoil anything or tell how it ends, but for me it was a rare chance to finally see this interesting project, and also River Phoenix' last film.

George Sluizer's salvaged 1993 desert thriller Dark Blood is an uneasy but captivating watch. More than anything its a tantalising final glimpse into the talent of star River Phoenix, surly one of the most promising actors the world has ever seen.

Rivers tragic and sudden death in the winter of 93 halted production and left the film missing many of its most crucial and inmate scenes. To overcome this director Sluizer can be heard reading the script amongst a mixture of stills and short clips. This method, whilst effective, is quite jarring and ultimately strange mainly due to Sluizers heavily accented, matter of fact voice which clash with the very intimate words and actions he is trying to get across.

However we do get long periods where the film plays uninterrupted, its in these moments we get a sense of what a great movie this may have been. At times a classic Hollywood thriller and others a disturbing art house flick.

Pryce and Judy Davis are pretty much note perfect as the bickering Hollywood couple. Pryce plays his character so well I would not be surprised if the role was written with him in mind.

Its no secret that Judy Davis was a very difficult actress to work with not only for the director but also the actors. River in particular was targeted with many friends reporting he would call them in tears due to her hostile treatment towards him. Such was his misery that he personally asked Sluizer to delay the most intimate scenes between them till the last days of shooting (they were never completed). It is to both actors immense credit that this difficult working relationship never comes across on screen, the scenes between them burn with desire and feeling.

Its impossible to talk about this film without really talking about River, even as you are watching the film, the tragedy that was to come is always there, playing on your mind. At only 23 River Phoenix was an Oscar nominated actor of incredible talent, grace and beauty. With the character of "Boy" he was able to display a side of him we had never seen before. He is terrifying, disturbing and dangerous but even in the throes of this madness that trademark sensitivity of Rivers shines through. He was a very special and incredibly gifted actor, and this film like all his prior performances have done before it, bear tribute to that.

I never really took much notice of River movies at the time he were alive but this film had me feeling a good connection to the character and story. The pace of the movie felt similar to No Country For Old Men. The missing scenes did not seem to subtract from the movie as the main story is there and as stated the director gives us a voice over. Certainly a film to watch again.