WW3-La terza guerra mondiale

You don't often see science-fiction films with this much attention to technical detail, good plot, good dialogue AND good acting. "WW3" is both entertaining and technically accurate. Every bit of praise lavished on Stephen Soderbergh's "Contagion" is actually true of THIS movie.

The action in this film will happen someday in real life. That faithfulness to actual events carries the audience through the parts where the action begins to lag.

This film should be played regularly on the Sci-Fi Network because it's actual science fiction, not a half-hearted attempt at making it.

Timothy Bottoms and Vanessa Williams are solid as the FBI agents who are the film's protagonists. Vanessa Williams is a much more convincing FBI agent than Gillian Anderson or Annabeth Gish managed to be in "The X- Files" - she lays down a hard-edged, authentic performance while remaining sympathetic. I can't remember a film in which I enjoyed Williams' work more - her performance here is much better than in "Eraser," for example.

Lane Smith and Michael Constantine are also convincing as biological warfare experts. Smith evokes the real-life über-weaponeer William Patrick eerily - right down to the sense of moral ambiguity you get watching them talk - while Constantine makes the borscht-belt Russian accent work, playing a scientist who, like Ken Alibek or Vladimir Pachesnik did in real life defected from the Russian BW program.

There's enough solid action, twists, and turns in WW3 that telling you the movie's about its main characters trying to locate the source of a nationwide epidemic of a hybrid between deadly Marburg virus and influenza isn't "writing a spoiler."

Marin Hinkle (whom we know better as "Alan's" ex-wife in "Two and a Half Men") is a pleasant surprise as the dedicated physician who is married to Timothy Bottoms' character. She's beautiful and a great actress, and for once has a role in which she can show us how talented she is.

Apart from getting a couple of historical dates and a microphotographic detail slightly wrong, the movie is more faithful to the technical facts of the emerging biological warfare threat than any movie I've ever seen.

WW3 should be shown regularly until all Americans realize how dangerous biological weapons are. SyFy Channel shows "The Day After" every Fourth of July and on other national holidays to teach the American public about nuclear war, a hazard it's possible they know plenty about and have been misinformed about even more.

The anthrax mail epidemic caused by the US Army biological defense laboratory Fort Detrick's Dr. Bruce Ivins in 2001 wasn't the only biological warfare terrorist attack on American soil in real life; it wasn't the first such attack in our history (that would have been the Royal Army General Jeffrey Amherst's giving blankets contaminated with smallpox to the Iroquois during the French and Indian Wars in the 1700s) and it probably won't be the last one.

SyFy Network could perform a real and badly-needed public service by showing WW3 to their viewers because biological warfare is a much more likely hazard to the world than nuclear war ever will be.

Watch this film. It's very well made, the odds are good that you'll like it, and you need to know what it says.

We're already in World War 3, according to some people. While the anthrax bacillus mail attacks were the works of a deranged American scientist, it's only a matter of time before foreign extremists (such as Al-Qaeda, whose biological warfare laboratory in Algeria suffered an "own goal" accident which killed the staff there) succeed in their own biological warfare attack on the West.

Sooner or later, someone will do a more professional job.

This movie started out fairly interesting, even for a made-for-TV movie. Even though it ripped off things from "The Stand" and "Saving Private Ryan" I thought it was rather well made. And then, suddenly, after almost no noticable climax, it ended. To say the least I was shocked. I half expected a "to be continued" or some kind of epilogue. Nothing. The story dropped off into a void of nothingness, leaving me totally unsatisfied. Also, the title is completely misleading. There was never any "war" onscreen, only terrorist attacks and a quick mention of war in Kuait at the end. It would have been great as the first installment in a miniseries but unfortunatly, the creators saw differently.

The title of the movie "WW3" is completely misleading. No war occurs. A movie named "WW3" should be about nuclear apocalypse, or in this case, biological apocalypse.

However, this movie does, in its overly-exaggerated manner, somewhat get its point across. For example, the thought of biological warfare did become a small part of my mind after this.

This movie's producers probably never dreamed that the message at the end ("Scientists feel that it is not a question of if such an attack will occur, but when...") would turn out to be true. Two months after the broadcast of the movie, the September 11 terrorist attacks occurred. A month later, lo and behold, there was a bioterrorist attack on the United States with anthrax. (It was not nearly as bad as the one in the movie.)

Overall, worth watching, if you have the time...once.

Was in the middle of watching this (under the title "Winds Of Terror") on video, when I started to get a sinking feeling... This wasn't made BEFORE 9/11 was it? Came here and so it was. All I can say is...

Oh. My. God.

All the FBI and CIA had to do was watch this. They even name Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. So, sorry, the excuse of "nobody could have seen it coming" won't wash any more.

BTW - this movie is also heavily influenced by Richard Preston's "Hot Zone" - even to the point of borrowing whole chunks of text and dialog. Preston was the guy who woke up the Clinton Administration to the bioweapon threat.

Conclusion - you don't need to see this movie. You already saw it on 9/11 and the Anthrax attacks after. Let's hope there isn't a sequel in the works...

This cable television movie was released on VHS in Brazil a couple of months ago, in 2003. It has good actors and is well produced. The characters are well developed and it could be an above-average interesting action-drama movie about the outbreak of WW3; but it is not. It is a very disappointing movie, with a cheap message against many nations. First, there is no World War 3, as the title suggests. Indeed, the plot is based on a terrorist attack through a virus released first in an American passenger vessel and then in an American Stadium of baseball. Timothy Hutton is an FBI agent that has the mission to contact his uncle, who may have experience with this type of virus. There is an amazing poor dialog between Eric, the character of Terry O'Quinn (an FBI agent) and his director, that can summarize the quality of this movie. The FBI director says:" - It is official, Eric, we bombed the wrong people!", and Eric (Terry O'Quinn) replies: " - I am sure they deserved it for something." Enough? No, the movie seems to have no end. It 'fades out', without any conclusion. I would not recommend this movie to other readers: I am sure they do not deserve it! My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "WW3"