Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAn educational short film explaining the dangers of marijuana use via the story of a young man named Tom, his parents, and Tom's pot-smoking friends.An educational short film explaining the dangers of marijuana use via the story of a young man named Tom, his parents, and Tom's pot-smoking friends.An educational short film explaining the dangers of marijuana use via the story of a young man named Tom, his parents, and Tom's pot-smoking friends.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
J. Edward McKinley
- Tom's Dad
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Recensioni in evidenza
Very far from the awful exploiter "movie", "reeefer madness", "keep off the grass" is still an attempt to discourage youth from taking up the habit of smoking pot, marijuana, hash, the child with a host of names.
Made in 1969, at the height of the "rebellion of youth" against the establishment, the Vietnam war at its peak, Nixon president, and the world needing a boost of something to level out the fear of things escalating, pot had found a home with young "rebels", who needed to assess the world in a different way from their parents - and found in the (still) illegal drug a different feeling from the aggression-inducing alcohol of 'before'.
The movie documents a youth, discovered by his father to be a recent convert to pot, in rational search for information about the drug and consequences of using it - in fact the whole of the movie is based so much on rational thought, that one could get the impression somebody was actually concerned with the hysteria from the media - "jumped from 16th floor high on marijuana" and similar headlines - and from the FDA and FBI, who needed another focus, after the end of alcohol prohibition, and found it in the pot, smoked by jazz fans and Negroes alike, to prevent massive unemployment in the 16.000 men strong police force ...
The basic idea of the movie - that the young man search for confirmation of information - is in fact rather good, and at that time, quite novel idea, if only superficially rational, when all conclusions are based on observable, but partial 'facts' - loss of coordination, redness of eyes, "loss of dignity", obsessive mono-focus, humorous outbursts over 'nothing', overrating of personal achievements, pot leads to crime or heavier abuse etc. And the young man to no great surprise has all the 'facts' confirmed at various hip parties, visit to the local hip dope influenced artist loving his new doodles, watching the courteous police arrest a friend, who could not resist trying to buy his dope at the wrong place, and end up getting ripped of at night by three youngster spouting the 'right' lingo to tie them in with the rest of the pack!
A very educational movie, which has no doubt helped with its mission in its own time - but today seems only a step removed from the hysterics of 'reefer madness' and the like. Personally it seems to me that use of marijuana never had quite the impact on culture as was feared and prophesied in the script. But one should never discount the parental generation's attempt to warn the younger. And as such it comes across: Observe the signs, and think for yourself.
Made in 1969, at the height of the "rebellion of youth" against the establishment, the Vietnam war at its peak, Nixon president, and the world needing a boost of something to level out the fear of things escalating, pot had found a home with young "rebels", who needed to assess the world in a different way from their parents - and found in the (still) illegal drug a different feeling from the aggression-inducing alcohol of 'before'.
The movie documents a youth, discovered by his father to be a recent convert to pot, in rational search for information about the drug and consequences of using it - in fact the whole of the movie is based so much on rational thought, that one could get the impression somebody was actually concerned with the hysteria from the media - "jumped from 16th floor high on marijuana" and similar headlines - and from the FDA and FBI, who needed another focus, after the end of alcohol prohibition, and found it in the pot, smoked by jazz fans and Negroes alike, to prevent massive unemployment in the 16.000 men strong police force ...
The basic idea of the movie - that the young man search for confirmation of information - is in fact rather good, and at that time, quite novel idea, if only superficially rational, when all conclusions are based on observable, but partial 'facts' - loss of coordination, redness of eyes, "loss of dignity", obsessive mono-focus, humorous outbursts over 'nothing', overrating of personal achievements, pot leads to crime or heavier abuse etc. And the young man to no great surprise has all the 'facts' confirmed at various hip parties, visit to the local hip dope influenced artist loving his new doodles, watching the courteous police arrest a friend, who could not resist trying to buy his dope at the wrong place, and end up getting ripped of at night by three youngster spouting the 'right' lingo to tie them in with the rest of the pack!
A very educational movie, which has no doubt helped with its mission in its own time - but today seems only a step removed from the hysterics of 'reefer madness' and the like. Personally it seems to me that use of marijuana never had quite the impact on culture as was feared and prophesied in the script. But one should never discount the parental generation's attempt to warn the younger. And as such it comes across: Observe the signs, and think for yourself.
If there was a group pf potheads and a group of drunks which one would you wanna hang out with? There can be a liquor store on every corner and that's ok but watch out for that devil ganja. Jeez. Oh but done well for Nixon's administration. Reefer Madness 70s style
Until I was able to download a copy of this I had forgotten about it. As was typical with the films we were forced to watch in High School Health Class way back in the 1970's, when a lot of us still had a Black & White TV, and color picture was a treat! This like the others, either at best tempted the viewer to try Pot, or at the very least gave us a good laugh.
However, this one movie more than the others, seemed to actually give both points of view! That was very rare for that era, as Nixon was in power (who was not a crook!) and the infamous "War On Drugs" had started its long loosing battle. Although at the same time as presenting the "Pro" left out very little regarding the "Con"
Has several folks who look like Manyard G Crebbs (does the G stand for Gilligan?) Rest His Soul.
But if you wish to be "Hip like a Zip, Lets Take A Trip" this film will show as many others do, how much folks shared the goods to get a new customer hooked, then how it will lead them down the Highway To Hell with the harder drugs.
Plot twists, drama, suspense, kills, thrills, its just the facts, and it all has to be true because its says so in the movie!
Could I say more?
However, this one movie more than the others, seemed to actually give both points of view! That was very rare for that era, as Nixon was in power (who was not a crook!) and the infamous "War On Drugs" had started its long loosing battle. Although at the same time as presenting the "Pro" left out very little regarding the "Con"
Has several folks who look like Manyard G Crebbs (does the G stand for Gilligan?) Rest His Soul.
But if you wish to be "Hip like a Zip, Lets Take A Trip" this film will show as many others do, how much folks shared the goods to get a new customer hooked, then how it will lead them down the Highway To Hell with the harder drugs.
Plot twists, drama, suspense, kills, thrills, its just the facts, and it all has to be true because its says so in the movie!
Could I say more?
Tom's father finds his stash and confronts him. Tom insists that pot is safe and seeks advise from older kid Mack. Tom is introduced to the world of pot. I'm surprised at the reasonable portrayal of the weed users considering the anti-grass government propaganda. Quite frankly, I'm more convinced by the kids' point of view rather than the stale old guy narration. From the Santa Monica Police Department, the propaganda is listed off like a checklist and the cops are super nice. In a way, it's a more effective argument to not ridicule the kids doing pot. It doesn't mean that the message is any less slanted. This is not ridiculous fun like other anti-grass public service films. For its time and its purpose, it was probably the most effective possible. Despite the entire list of slant arguments, the film ends with "Let's wait and see" and that's probably the best they could do at that time. In the 50 years since then, I think we have waited and seen enough to make an educated choice.
The ultra hip lingo in this short make it worth watching, and pretty amusing. Most of it is familiar, except for blowing pot. Maybe that was a Cali thing from the 60s.
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe Life magazine Tom's dad gives him to read is the October 31, 1969 issue.
- BlooperWhen Tom and his pal are driving in the blue sports car, they run a stop sign and almost hit a red station wagon. The station wagon is first shown as stopping right at the intersection, but in the next shot looking back, it is stopped half-way out into the intersection.
- Citazioni
Narrator: Mac takes Tom to a psychedelic shop, a head shop. The place is something else. Out of sight. A pot smoker's supermarket. A psychedelicatessen.
- ConnessioniEdited into The Educational Archives: More Sex & Drugs (2003)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 1000 USD (previsto)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti