Parigi, marzo 1942. La vicenda ruota intorno alla Continental Film, una casa di produzione controllata dalla Germania e fondata a Parigi nel 1940, per cui i tecnici francesi sono indecisi se... Leggi tuttoParigi, marzo 1942. La vicenda ruota intorno alla Continental Film, una casa di produzione controllata dalla Germania e fondata a Parigi nel 1940, per cui i tecnici francesi sono indecisi se lavorare o meno: è un posto dove stare al sicuro, o significa collaborare con il nemico?Parigi, marzo 1942. La vicenda ruota intorno alla Continental Film, una casa di produzione controllata dalla Germania e fondata a Parigi nel 1940, per cui i tecnici francesi sono indecisi se lavorare o meno: è un posto dove stare al sicuro, o significa collaborare con il nemico?
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 7 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Recensioni in evidenza
The film concerns the French film industry during the Nazi occupation. Despite the Germans running things, they did allow the French to continue making films--so long as they didn't violate Nazi sensibilities. After the war, some of these people who continued making films were sharply criticized as collaborators. This film focuses on two people in the business and illustrated that there were many different motivations for working in the film industry at this time. Some simply had no choice (work or die), some needed jobs, some gladly embraced evil and some worked in the film business while actively fighting the Nazis. The two men are a very busy writer and an assistant director. The writer (Jean Aurenche) has a very shallow, if not non-existent moral compass, as he is most concerned with sexual conquests and not "rocking the boat". The assistant director (Jean-Devaivre), in sharp contrast, is a loving family man who also works with the Resistance and takes great risks for what he knows is right.
The writing, directing and acting are all first-rate and it was an excellent film--especially from a historical standpoint. By the way, the two main characters were real figures in the film industry. In fact, Jean-Devaivre wrote the book on which the movie is based.
"Laissez-Passer" has a magnificent cinematography and reconstitution of occupied France, supported by top-notch performances. Unfortunately the story is tiresome, uninteresting and too long, and the subplot with Jean Aurenche goes nowhere. The narrative of the lead story with Jean-Devaivre is too cold, without any tension and could be shorter and shorter. My vote is six.
Title (Brazil): "Passaporte Para a Vida" ("Passport for the Life")
The movie was not a big commercial success and it's easy to see why;you've got to know and appreciate the French cinema during the Occupation.There are veiled hints:they speak of the "Gauloise" during Simon' s sequence :it's Simon's good friend Arletty who was in love with a German .And in the end ,the movie disappoints ,getting bogged down in details and played with actors who lack charisma :Denis Podalydes as Jean Aurenche,who wrote " Douce" " le diable au corps" "Jeux interdits" !He even wrote for Tavernier himself :all his first movies!Well Denis Podalydes may be a commendable actor but elsewhere!The same can be said of the rest of the cast:no stand-out.The English episode was it so necessary?
The movie is useful anyway.It makes feel like watching again and again and again "Douce" "la main du diable" or "le corbeau" ,these jewels which the nouvelle vague was never able,in spite of their pretension,to equal.
NB:Jean Devaivre became a director after the war:his first movies were offbeat works such as "la dame de onze heures"and "la ferme des sept péchés".but he quickly degenerated into mediocrity with his poor sequels of Richard Pottier 's "Caroline Chérie" .
Based on a true story of screenwriter Jean Aurenche (Denis Podalydès), firm in his conviction that he would never write in support of the Nazi regime, and director Jean Devaivre (Jacques Gamblin) who opted for complying on the surface with a film production company headed by the German occupiers while retaining his firm stance as part of the French Resistance, the story involves a large cast who portray actors, production people, friends, victims, Germans, etc and the plot is at times so convoluted that you may need to pause and backup to make sure you have not lost any important information.
The actors are outstanding and the complete production crew of this film has created a tense, atmospheric, intelligent tale that makes the audience respect even more the incredible bravery of the French Resistance movement. This is brilliant film-making - it just goes on a bit too long at 2 hours and 45 minutes! Grady Harp, September 05
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie has more than 115 speaking parts.
- BlooperThe film credits include references to a Lysander and a Dakota but Devaivre flies out in a de Haviland Dragon Rapide, and is parachuted back into France from what looks like a Lockheed Hudson (as it has twin tailfins, it cannot be a Dakota).
- ConnessioniFeatures La mano del diavolo (1943)
I più visti
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 25.440 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 6811 USD
- 13 ott 2002
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 1.713.421 USD